Correlation between self-reported gestational age and ultrasound measurements

References

• Naegele FC. Lehrbuch der Geburtshülfe für Hebammen, 3rd Ed. Heidelberg: Mohr, 1836.
   Google Scholar
• Geirsson RT, Busby-Earle RM. Certain dates may not provide a reliable estimate of gestational age. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 98: 108–9.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell S, Warsof SL, Little D, Cooper DJ. Routine ultrasound screening for the prediction of gestational age. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 65: 613–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belfrage P, Fernstrom I, Hallenberg G. Routine or selective ultrasound examinations in early pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69: 747–50.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen TH, Larsen T, Engholm G, Moller H. Evaluation of ultrasound-estimated date of delivery in 17,450 spontaneous singleton births: do we need to modify Naegele’s rule? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 14: 23–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardosi J, Geirsson RT. Routine ultrasound is the method of choice for dating pregnancy (comment). Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105: 933–6.
   Google Scholar
• Tunon K, Eik-Nes SH, Grottum P. A comparison between ultrasound and a reliable last menstrual period as predictors of the day of delivery in 15,000 examinations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 8: 178–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldenstrom U, Axelsson O, Nilsson S. A comparison of the ability of a sonographically measured biparietal diameter and the last menstrual period to predict the spontaneous onset of labor. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76: 336–8.
   Google Scholar
• Grennert L, Persson PH, Gennser G. Benefits of ultrasonic screening of a pregnant population. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1978; (Suppl. 78): S5–S14.
   Google Scholar
• Saari-Kemppainen A, Karjalainen O, Ylostalo P, Heinonen OP. Ultrasound screening and perinatal mortality: controlled trial of systematic one-stage screening in pregnancy. The Helsinki Ultrasound Trial. Lancet 1990; 336: 387–91.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen J, Melbye M, Olsen SF, Sorensen TI, Aaby P, Andersen AM et al. The Danish National Birth Cohort – its background, structure and aim. Scand J Public Health 2001; 29: 300–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudsen LB, Olsen J. Danish Med Birth Registry. Dan Med Bull 1998; 45: 320–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jörgensen FS. Epidemiological studies of obstetric ultrasound examinations in Denmark 1989–90 versus 1994–95. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999; 78: 305–9.
   Google Scholar
• Persson PH, Weldner BM. Reliability of ultrasound fetometry in estimating gestational age in the second trimester. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1986; 65: 481–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kieler H, Axelsson O, Nilsson S, Waldenstrom U. The length of human pregnancy as calculated by ultrasonographic measurement of the fetal biparietal diameter. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 6: 353–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen J, Langhoff-Roos J, Skovgaard LT, Kristensen FB. Validation of the Danish Birth Registration. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49: 893–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backe B, Nakling J. Term prediction in routine ultrasound practice. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1994; 73: 113–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldenberg RL, Davis RO, Cutter GR, Hoffman HJ, Brumfield CG, Foster JM. Prematurity, postdates, and growth retardation: the influence of use of ultrasonography on reported gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160: 462–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldenstrom U, Axelsson O, Nilsson S, Eklund G, Fall O, Lindeberg S et al. Effects of routine one-stage ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1988; 2: 585–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriksen TB, Wilcox AJ, Hedegaard M, Secher NJ. Bias in studies of preterm and postterm delivery due to ultrasound assessment of gestational age. Epidemiology 1995; 6: 533–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen JF. Ultrasound evidence of sexual difference in fetal size in first trimester. Br Med J 1980; 281: 1253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunon K, Eik-Nes SH, Grottum P. Fetal outcome when the ultrasound estimate of the day of delivery is more than 14 days later than the last menstrual period estimate. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 14: 17–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar