External cephalic version: a safe procedure? A systematic review of version-related risks

References

• Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet 2000; 356: 1375–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hodnett ED, Chalmers B, Kung R, Willan A et al. Outcomes at 3 months after planned cesarean vs planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term. The International Randomized Term Breech Trial. J Am Med Assoc 2002; 287: 1822–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutton EK, Hannah ME, Barret J. Use of external cephalic version for breech pregnancy and mode of delivery for breech and twin pregnancy: a survey of Canadian practitioners. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2002; 24: 804–10.
   Google Scholar
• Siddiqui D, Stiller RJ, Collins J, Laifer SA. Pregnancy outcome after successful external version. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 1092–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• James M, Hunt K, Burr R, Johanson R. A decision analytical cost analysis of offering ECV in a UK district general hospital. BMC Health Serv Res 2001; 1: 6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walker R, Turnbull D, Wilkinson C. Strategies to address global cesarean section rates: a review of the evidence. Birth 2002; 29: 28–39.
   Google Scholar
• Halmesmaki E. Vaginal term breech delivery – a time for reappraisal ? Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand 2001; 80: 187–90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The management of breech presentation. Guideline No. 20. RCOG Clinical Green Top Guidelines, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG committee opinion. Mode of term singleton breech delivery. No. 265, December 2001. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002; 77: 65–6.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Bowes WA, Fortney JA. Efficacy of external cephalic version: a review. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82: 306–12.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Haroush A, Perri T, Bar J, Yogev Y, Bar-Hava I, Hod M et al. Mode of delivery following successful external cephalic version. Am J Perinatol 2002; 19: 355–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyer CH, Heard MJ. A prospective audit of external cephalic version at term: are ultrasound parameters predictive of outcome? J Obstet Gynaecol 2001; 21: 580–2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wong WM, Lao TT, Liu KL. Predicting the success of external cephalic version with a scoring system. A prospective, two-phase study. J Reprod Med 2000; 45: 201–6.
   Google Scholar
• De Meeus JB, Ellia F, Magnin G. External cephalic version after previous cesarean section: a series of 38 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1998; 81: 65–8.
   Google Scholar
• Flamm BL, Fried MW, Lonky NM, Giles WS. External cephalic version after previous cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 370–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Arie A, Kogan S, Schachter M, Hagay ZJ, Insler V. The impact of external cephalic version on the rate of vaginal and cesarean breech deliveries: a 3-year cumulative experience. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1995; 63: 125–9.
   Google Scholar
• Green PM, Alfirevic Z. External cephalic version. Hosp Med 1999; 60: 860–2.
   Google Scholar
• Lau TK, Lo KW, Leung TY, Fok WY, Rogers MS. Outcome of labour after successful cephalic version at term complicated by isolated transient fetal bradycardia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2000; 107: 401–5.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner Z, Farmakides G, Hsieh H, Maulik D. Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate changes after antepartum external cephalic version. J Reprod Med 1996; 41: 680–4.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez CO, Bloom SL, Smulian JC, Ananth CV, Wendel GD Jr. A randomized placebo-controlled evaluation of terbutaline for external cephalic version. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90: 775–9.
   Google Scholar
• Karantis E, Alcock D, Phelan LK, Homer CSE, Davis GK. Introducing external cephalic version to clinical practice. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol Suppl 2001; 41: 395–7.
   Google Scholar
• Mahomed K, Seeras R, Coulson R. External cephalic version at term. A randomized controlled trial using tocolysis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 98: 8–13.
   Google Scholar
• Flock F, Stoz F, Paulus W, Scheurle B, Kreinberg R. Äußere Wendung aus Beckenendlage in Schädellage: Einflußfaktoren, Nutzen und Risiken. [External fetal version from breech presentation to cephalic presentation: modifying factors, reliability and risks.] (In German with English abstract.) Zentralbl Gynakol 1998; 120: 60–5.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt S, Wagner U, Vogt M, Schmolling J, Gembruch U, Hansmann M et al. Erfolgskriterien für die äußere Wendung des Feten aus Beckenendlage in Schädellage. [Criteria for successful outcome of external fetal version from breech presentation to cephalic presentation.] (In German with English abstract.) Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 1997; 201: 30–4.
   Google Scholar
• Regalia AL, Curiel P, Natale N, Galluzzi A, Spinelli G, Ghezzi GV et al. Routine use of external cephalic version in three hospitals. Birth 2000; 27: 19–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan LYS, Lau TK, Chiu PY, Wing-KinWong G, Leung TN. Levels of cord blood thyroid stimulating hormone after external cephalic version. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2001; 108: 1076–80.
   Google Scholar
• Wax JR, Sutula BA, Lerer T, Steinfeld JD, Ingardia CJ. Labor and delivery following successful external cephalic version. Am J Perinatol 2000; 17: 183–6.
   Google Scholar
• Ezra Y, Elram T, Plotkin V, Elchalal U. Significance of success rate of external cephalic versions and vaginal breech deliveries in counseling women with breech presentation at term. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000; 90: 63–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanrachakul B, Jaovisidha A, Herabutya Y, Srimanoi M, Puttharuksa J. External cephalic version: first report from Thailand. J Med Assoc Thai 1999; 82: 224–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aisenbrey GA, Catanzarite VA, Nelson C. External cephalic version: predictors of success. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94: 783–6.
   Google Scholar
• Norchi S, Tenore AC, Lovotti M, Merati R, Teatini A, Belloni C. Efficacy of external cephalic version performed at term. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1998; 76: 161–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobande AA, Zaki ZMS, Albar HM. Experience with selective external cephalic version at term in Saudi Arabia: a three year review. J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 18: 439–41.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes GW. The value of external cephalic version. Contemp Rev Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 10: 91–8.
   Google Scholar
• Teoh TG. Effect of learning curve on the outcome of external cephalic version. Singapore Med J 1997; 38: 323–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Healey M, Porter R, Galimberti A. Introducing external cephalic version at 36 weeks or more in a district general hospital: a review and an audit. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 1073–9.
   Google Scholar
• Nohe G, Hartmann W, Klapproth CE. (Außere Wendung des Feten als ambulanter Eingriff. [Fetal version as ambulatory intervention.] (In German with English abstract.) Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 1996; 56: 328–30.
   Google Scholar
• Chung T, Neale E, Lau TK, Rogers M. A randomized, double blind, controlled trial of tocolysis to assist external cephalic version in late pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1996; 75: 720–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquette GP, Boucher M, Theriault D, Rinfret D. Does the use of a tocolytic agent affect the success rate of external cephalic version? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175: 859–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson RL, Elliot JP. Fetal acoustic stimulation, an adjunct to external cephalic version: a blinded, randomized crossover study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173: 1369–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mashiach R, Hod M, Kaplan B, Friedman S, Ovadia J, Schoenfeld A. External cephalic version at term using broad criteria: effect on mode of delivery. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 1995; 22: 279–84.
   Google Scholar
• Megory E, Ohel G, Fisher O, Ruach M. Mode of delivery following external cephalic version and induction of labor at term. Am J Perinatol 1995; 12: 404–6.
   Google Scholar
• Calhoun BC, Edgeworth D, Brehm W. External cephalic version at a military teaching hospital: predictors of success. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 35: 277–9.
   Google Scholar
• Schachter M, Kogan S, Blickstein I. External cephalic version after previous cesarean section — a clinical dilemma. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1994; 45: 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Bewley S, Robson SC, Smith M, Glover A, Spencer JA. The introduction of external cephalic version at term into routine clinical practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1993; 52: 89–93.
   Google Scholar
• Goh JT, Johnson CM, Gregora MG. External cephalic version at term. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 33: 364–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shalev E, Battino S, Giladi Y, Edelstein S. External cephalic version at term — using tocolysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1993; 72: 455–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook HA. Experience with external cephalic version and selective vaginal breech delivery in private practice. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168: 1886–90.
   Google Scholar
• Stock A, Rogers M, Wong WM. External cephalic version — a cautionary tale. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 32: 378–9.
   Google Scholar
• Thunedborg P, Fischer-Rasmussen W, Tollund L. The benefit of external cephalic version with tocolysis as a routine procedure in late pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1991; 42: 23–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeRosa J, Anderle LJ. External cephalic version of term singleton breech presentations with tocolysis: a retrospective study in a community hospital. J Am Osteopath Assoc 1991; 91: 355–7.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Pavert R, Bennebroek Gravenhorst J, Keirse MJ. Het nut van uitwendige versie bijstuitligging a terme. [The benefit of external version full-term breech presentation.] (In Dutch with English abstract.) Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1990; 134: 2245–8.
   Google Scholar
• Donald WL, Barton JJ. Ultrasonography and external cephalic version at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 1542–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanss JW Jr. The efficacy of external cephalic version and its impact on the breech experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 1459–64.
   Google Scholar
• Hellström AC, Nilsson B, Stånge L, Nylund L. When does external cephalic version succeed? Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand 1990; 69: 281–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saling E, de Almeida P, Schwarzenau E. (Äußere Wendung des Feten aus Beckenendlage in Schädellage. Auswertung von 1000 Fallen. [External fetal version from breech to vertex presentation. Evaluation of 1000 cases.] (In German with English abstract.) Geburtshilfe Frauenhelikd 1993; 53: 597–602.
   Google Scholar
• Schorr SJ, Speights SE, Ross EL, Bofill JA, Rust OA, Norman PF et al. A randomized trial of epidural anesthesia to improve external cephalic version success. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 1133–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dugoff L, Stamm CA, Jones OW 3rd, Mohling SI, Hawkins JL. The effect of spinal anesthesia on the success rate of external cephalic version; a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93: 345–9.
   Google Scholar
• Mancuso KM, Yancey MK, Murphy JA, Markenson GR. Epidural analgesia for cephalic version: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95: 648–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnbach DJ, Matut J, Stein DJ, Campagnuolo J, Drimbarean C, Grunebaum A et al. The effect of intrathecal analgesia on the success of external cephalic version. Anesth Analg 2001; 93: 410–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherayil G, Feinberg B, Robinson J, Tsen LC. Central neuraxial blockade promotes external cephalic version success after a failed attempt. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 1589–92.
   Google Scholar
• Myerscough P. The practice of external cephalic version. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105: 1043–5.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmeyr GJ. Breech presentation and abnormal lie in late pregnancy. In: Chalmers I, Enkin M, Keirse MJ, eds. Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth, vol. 1: Pregnancy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989: 653–65.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan B. External cephalic version as an alternative to breech delivery and caesarean section. Soc Sci Med 1984; 18: 637–51.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmeyr GJ. External cephalic version at term: how high are the stakes? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 98: 1–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scorza WE. Intrapartum management of breech presentation. Clin Perinatol 1996; 23: 31–49.
   Google Scholar
• Göttlicher S, Madjariæ J. Die lage der Menschlichen Frucht im Verlauf der Schwangerschaft und die Wahrscheinlichkeit einer spontanen Drehung in die Kopflage bei Erst- und Mehrgebär-enden. [The position of the human fetus and the probability of a spontaneous change to vertex presentation in primiparae and multiparae.] (In German with English abstract.) Geburtshilfe Frauenheilk 1985; 45: 534—8.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmeyr GJ. External cephalic version for breech presentation before term (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, Oxford: Update Software, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, Oxford: Update Software, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Savona-Ventura C. The role of external cephalic version in modern obstetrics. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1986; 41: 393–400.
   Google Scholar
• Schuitemaker N, van Roosmalen J, Dekker G, van Dongen P, van Geijn H, Bennebroek Gravenhorst J. Maternal mortality after cesarean section in the Netherlands. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand 1997; 76: 332–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller-Holve W. Causes of complications in external cephalic versions. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 1979; 39: 635–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee on Quality Assessment. Quality evaluation and improvement in practice antepartum external cephalic version. No. 30, January 1998. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1998; 61: 91–2.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmeyr GJ. Interventions to help external cephalic version for breech presentation at term (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, Oxford: Update Software, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Phelan JP, Stine LE, Mueller E, McCart D, Yeh S. Observations of fetal heart rate characteristics related to external cephalic version and tocolysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 149: 658–61.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmeyr GJ, Sonnendecker EW. Cardiotocographic changes after external cephalic version. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1983; 90: 914–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lau TK, Leung TY, Lo KW, Kok WY, Rogers MS. Effect of external cephalic version at term on fetal circulation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 1239–42.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinovici J, Barkai G, Shalev J, Mashiach S. Fetal heart rate changes following external cephalic version under tocolysis near term. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1987; 25: 277–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen S, Irgens LM, Bergsjø P, Dalaker K. The occurrence of placental abruption in Norway 1967–1991. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand 1996; 75: 222–8.
   Google Scholar
• Nord E, Blaschke E, Green K, Thomassen P. 100 cases of external cephalic version, with special reference to fetomaternal transfusion. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand 1989; 68: 55–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghidini A, Korker V. Fetal complication after external cephalic version at term: case report and literature review. J Matern Fetal Med 1999; 8: 190–2.
   Google Scholar
• Luyet F, Schmid J, Maroni E, Duc G. Massive feto-maternal transfusion during external cephalic version, with fatal outcome. Arch Gynakol 1976; 221: 273–5.
   Google Scholar
• Franckx J, Sacre-Smits L. Severe neonatal anemia possibly caused by spontaneous cephalic version, with excellent outcome — a case report. J Perinat Med 1984; 12: 147–50.
   Google Scholar
• Engel K, Gerke-Engel G, Gerhard I, Bastert G. Fetomaternale Makrotransfusion nach erfolgreicher innerer Wendung aus Beckenendlage durch Moxibustion. [Foetomaternal macrotransfusion after successful internal cephalic version from breech presentation by Moxibustion.] (In German with English abstract.) Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 1992; 52: 241–3.
   Google Scholar
• Kainer F, Pertl B, Netzbandt P, Fast C. Der Einfluß der Ultraschalluntersuchung bei der äußeren Wendung der Beckenendlage. [Effect of ultrasound examination on fetal version of breech presentation.] (In German with English abstract.) Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 1994; 54: 108–10.
   Google Scholar
• Larson JD, Rayburn WF, Crosby S, Thurnau GR. Multiple nuchal cord entanglements and intrapartum complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173: 1228–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David M, Ruhmland B. Zum Einfluß fetaler Nabelschnurumschlingungen auf den postnatalen Zustand des Neugeborenen. [The influence of twisted fetal umbilical cord on fetal outcome.] (In German with English abstract.) Zentralbl Gynakol 1995; 117: 144–7.
   Google Scholar
• Mayank S, Kriplani A. Fetal demise following external cephalic version. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1997; 56: 177–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiedersberg E, Wittstock G, Wiedersberg H. Pathologie der Nabelschnur in Abhängigkeit vom Gestationsalter. Befunde bei 4267 fetalen und neonatalen Autopsien. [Pathology of the umbilical cord in relation to gestational age: findings in 4267 fetal and neonatal autopsies.] (In German with English abstract.) Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol 2001; 85: 175–92.
   Google Scholar
• Gimovsky M, Boyd C. Funic presentation as a complication of external cephalic version. A case report. J Reprod Med 1999; 44: 897–8.
   Google Scholar
• Berghella V. Prolapsed cord after external cephalic version in a patient with premature rupture of membranes and transverse lie. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2001; 99: 274–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Impey LWM, Pandit M. Breech presentation in the new millennium. Curr Obstet Gynaecol 2001; 11: 272–8.
   Google Scholar
• Smulian JC, Ananth CV, Vintzileos AM, Scorza WE, Knuppel RA. Fetal deaths in the United States: influence of high-risk conditions and implications for management. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100: 1183–9.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman GP, Weller RO, Normand IC, Gibbens D. Spinal cord transection in utero. Br Med J 1978; 2: 398.
   Google Scholar
• Ang LT. Compound presentation following external version. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1978; 18: 213–14.
   Google Scholar
• DeVore GR. In-utero cerebral vascular accident prior to external cephalic version. J Clin Ultrasound 1991; 19: 227–9.
   Google Scholar
• Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, de Spirlet M, Durand-Zaleski I, Blanié P, Fisher C et al. External cephalic version with epidural anaesthesia after failure of a first trial with beta-mimetics. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2000; 107: 406–10.
   Google Scholar