Decreased fetal movements: background, assessment, and clinical management

References

• Leader LR, Baillie P, Van Schalkwyk DJ. Fetal movements and fetal outcome: a prospective study. Obstet Gynecol 1981; 57: 431–6.
   Google Scholar
• Valentin L, Marsal K, Wahlgren L. Subjective recording of fetal movements. III. Screening of a pregnant population; the clinical significance of decreased fetal movement counts. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1986; 65: 753–8.
   Google Scholar
• Valentin L, Marsal K. Pregnancy outcome in women perceiving decreased fetal movement. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1987; 24: 23–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marsal K. Ultrasonic assessment of fetal activity. Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1983; 10: 541–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore TR, Piacquadio K. A prospective evaluation of fetal movement screening to reduce the incidence of antepartum fetal death. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160: 1075–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington K, Thompson O, Jordan L, Page J, Carpenter RG, Campbell S. Obstetric outcome in women who present with a reduction in fetal movements in the third trimester of pregnancy. J Perinat Med 1998; 26: 77–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez GR, Cortes RS, Pompa VS, Flores PR. Morbimortalidad perinatal asociada a hipomotilidad fetal. Ginecol Obstet Mex 1994; 62: 222–5.
   Google Scholar
• Fossen D, Silberg IE. Perinatal deaths in the county of Ostfold 1989–97. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 1999; 119: 1272–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dubiel M, Gudmundsson S, Thuring-Jonsson A, Maesel A, Marsal K. Doppler velocimetry and nonstress test for predicting outcome of pregnancies with decreased fetal movements. Am J Perinatol 1997; 14: 139–44.
   Google Scholar
• Rayburn WF. Fetal body movement monitoring. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1990; 17: 95–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neldam S. Fetal movements as an indicator of fetal well-being. Dan Med Bull 1986; 33: 213–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentin L. Fetal movements in late pregnancy. Detection of fetal jeopardy by objective recording and by maternal counting. Thesis. Lund University, Lund, Sweden 1986; 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Baskett TF, Liston RM. Fetal movement monitoring: clinical application. Clin Perinatol 1989; 16: 613–25.
   Google Scholar
• whitty JE, Garfinkel DA, Divon MY. Maternal perception of decreased fetal movement as an indication for antepartum testing in a low-risk population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 1084–8.
   Google Scholar
• Korszun P, Dubiel M, Kudla M, Gudmundsson S. Doppler velocimetry for predicting outcome of pregnancies with decreased fetal movements. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002; 81: 926–30.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick J, Fethersten W, Vick H, Voegelin R. Human fetal breathing movements and gross fetal body movements at week 34–35 of gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1978; 130: 693–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Minors DS, Waterhouse JM. The effect of maternal posture, meals and time of the day an fetal movements. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1979; 86: 717–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cunningham FG, Gant NF, Leveno KJ, Gilstrap LC III, Hauth JC, Wenstrom KD. Williams Obstetrics, 21st edn. 2001; 1095–110.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen FC, Rayburn WF. Fetal movement counts. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1999; 26: 607–21.
   Google Scholar
• ACOG Practice bulletin. Antepartum fetal surveillance. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2000; 68: 175–85.
   Google Scholar
• Sadovsky E, Ohel G, Havazeleth H, Steinwell A, Penchas S. The definition and the significance of decreased fetal movements. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1983; 62: 409–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson TRB. Maternal perception and Doppler detection of fetal movement. Clin Perinatol 1994; 21: 765–77.
   Google Scholar
• Magee LA, Dawes GS, Moulden M, Redman CWG. A randomised controlled comparison of betamethasone with dexa-methasone: effects on the antenatal fetal heart rate. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 1233–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jackson JR, Kleeman S, Doerzbacher M, Lambers DS. The effect of glucocorticosteroid administration on fetal movements and biophysical profile scores in normal pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2003; 13: 50–3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Velazquez MD, Rayburn WF. Antenatal evaluation of the fetus using fetal movement monitoring. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2002; 45: 993–1004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherer DM, Spong CY, Ghidini A, Minior RK, Salafia CM. Decreased amniotic fluid Volume at <32 weeks of gestation is associated with decreased fetal movements. Am J Perinatol 1996; 13: 479–82.
   Google Scholar
• Rayburn W, Zuspan F, Motley ME, Donaldson M. An alternative to antepartum fetal heart rate testing. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 138: 223–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant A, Elbourne D, Valentin L, Alexander S. Routine formal fetal movement counting and risk of antepartum late death in normally formed singletons. Lancet 1989; 2: 345–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikhail MS, Freda MC, Merkatz RB, Polizzotto R, Mazloom E, Merkatz IR. The effect of fetal movement counting on maternal attachment to fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 988–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liston RM, Bloom K, Zimmer P. The psychological effects of counting fetal movements. Birth 1994; 21: 135–40.
   Google Scholar
• Pattison N, McCowan L. Cardiotocography for antepartum fetal assessment (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane library, Issue 3. Oxford: Update Software, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Vindla S, Sahota DS, Coppens M, James DK. Computerized analysis of behavior in fetuses with congenital abnormalities. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997; 9: 302–9.
   Google Scholar
• Preboth M. ACOG Guidelines on antepartum fetal surveillance. Am Fam Physician 2000; 62: 1187–8.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz R, Persitz E, Sadovsky E. The relation between fetal heart rate accelerations and fetal movements. Obstet Gynecol 1983; 61: 16–8.
   Google Scholar
• Lee CY, Drukker B. The nonstress test for antepartum assessment of fetal reserve. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979; 134: 460–70.
   Google Scholar
• Meis PJ, Ureda JR, Swain RN, Kelly RT, Penry M, Sharp P. Variable decelerations during nonstress test are not a sign of fetal compromise. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 586–90.
   Google Scholar
• Nageotte MP, Towers CV, Asrat T, Freeman RK, Dorchester W. The value of a negative antepartum test: contraction stress test and modified biophysical profile. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84: 231–4.
   Google Scholar
• Tan KH, Smyth R. Fetal vibroacoustic stimulation for facilitation of tests of fetal wellbeing (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane library, Issue 3. Oxford: Update Software, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Marden D, McDuffie RSJ, Allen R, Abitz D. A randomized controlled trial of a new fetal acoustic stimulation test for fetal well-being. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176: 1386–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith CV, Phelan JP, Platt LD, Broussard P, Paul RH. Fetal acoustic stimulation testing. II. A randomized clinical comparison with the nonstress test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 155: 131–4.
   Google Scholar
• Montan S, Arulkumaran S, Ratnam SS. Computerised cardio- tocography following vibroacoustic stimulation. J Perinat Med 1992; 20: 471–7.
   Google Scholar
• Tan KH, Sabapathy A. Fetal manipulation for facilitating tests of fetal wellbeing (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane library, Issue 3. Oxford: Update Software, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Neilson JP, Alfirevic Z. Doppler ultrasound for fetal assessment in high risk pregnancies (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane library, Issue 3. Oxford: Update Software, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Westergaard HB, Langhoff-Ross J, Lingman G, Marsal K, Kreiner S. A critical appraisal of the use of umbilical artery Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies: use of meta-analyses in evidence-based obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 17: 466–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfirevic Z, Neilson JP. Biophysical profile for fetal assessment in high risk pregnancies (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane library, Issue 3. Oxford: Update Software, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Manning FA, Platt LD, Sipos L. Antepartum fetal evaluation: development of fetal biophysical profile. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 136: 787–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn MO, Phelan JP, Smith CV, Jacobs N, Rutherford SE. Antepartum fetal surveillance in the patient with decreased fetal movement. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 157: 860–4.
   Google Scholar