3
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

An outpatient regimen of combined oral mifepristone 400 mg and misoprostol 400 |ag for first-trimester legal medical abortion

, , &
Page 1098 | Received 24 Aug 2004, Accepted 14 Mar 2005, Published online: 09 Sep 2009

References

  • Kovacs L, Sas M, Resch BA, Ugocsai G, Swahn ML, Bygdeman M et al. Termination of very early pregnancy by RU 486 – an antiprogestational compound. Contraception 1984; 29: 399–410.
  • el-Refaey H, Rajasekar D, Abdalla M, Calder L, Templeton A. Induction of abortion with mifepristone (RU 486) and oral or vaginal misoprostol. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 983–87.
  • Peyron R, Aubeny E, Targosz V, Silvestre L, Renault M, Elkik F et al. Early termination of pregnancy with mifepristone (RU 486) and the orally active prostaglandin misoprostol. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 1509–13.
  • Honkanen H, Piaggio G, Hertzen H, Bartfai G, Erdenetungalag R, Gemzell-Danielsson K et al. for the WHO Research Group on Post-Ovulatory Methods for Fertility Regulation. WHO multinational study of three misoprostol regimens after mifepristone for early medical abortion. BJOG 2004; 111: 715–25.
  • Norman JE, Thong KJ, Baird DT. Uterine contractility and induction of abortion in early pregnancy by misoprostol and mifepristone. Lancet 1991; 338: 233–36.
  • Thong KJ, Baird DT. Induction of abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol in early pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 99: 1004–7.
  • Knudsen UB. First trimester abortion with mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol. Contraception 2001; 63: 247–50.
  • Bygdeman M, Danielsson KG. Options for early therapeutic abortion: a comparative review. Drugs 2002; 62: 2459–70.
  • Winikoff B, Ellertson C, Elul B, Sivin I. Acceptability and feasibility of early pregnancy termination by mifepristone- misoprostol. Results of a large multicenter trial in the United States. Mifepristone Clinical Trials Group. Arch Fam Med 1998; 7: 360–66.
  • Kulier R, Gulmezoglu AM, Hofmeyr GJ, Cheng LN, Campana A. Medical methods for first trimester abortion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004: (1): CD002855.
  • Aubeny E, Peyron R, Turpin CL, Renault M, Targosz V, Sivestre L et al. Termination of early pregnancy (up to 63 days of amenorrhea) with mifepristone and increasing doses of misoprostol. Int J Menopausal Stud 1995; 40\(Suppl. 2): 85–91.
  • Schaff EA, Stadalius LS, Eisinger SH, Franks P. Vaginal misoprostol administered at home after mifepristone (RU486) for abortion. J Fam Pract 1997; 44: 353–60.
  • Newhall EP, Winikoff B. Abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol: regimens, efficacy, acceptability and future directions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: S44–53.
  • Zieman M, Fong SK, Benowitz NL, Banskter D, Darney PD. Absorption kinetics of misoprostol with oral or vaginal administration. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90: 88–92.
  • Khan RU, El-Refaey H, Sharma S, Sooranna D, Stafford M. Oral, rectal, and vaginal pharmacokinetics of misoprostol. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103(Pt 1): 866–70.
  • Danielsson KG, Marions L, Rodriguez A, Spur BW, Wong PY, Bygdeman M. Comparison between oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol on uterine contractility. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93: 275–80.
  • Tang OS, Chan CC, Ng EH, Lee SW, Ho PC. A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial on the use of mifepristone with sublingual or vaginal misoprostol for medical abortions of less than 9 weeks gestation. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 2315–18.
  • McKinley C, Thong KJ, Baird DT. The effect of dose of mifepristone and gestation on the efficacy of medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol. Hum Reprod 1993; 8: 1502–5.
  • el-Rafaey H, Templeton A. Early abortion induction by a combination of mifepristone and oral misoprostol: a comparison between two dose regimens of misoprostol and their effect on blood pressure. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101: 792–96.
  • Aubeny E, Chatellier G. A randomized comparison of mifepristone and self-administered oral or vaginal misoprostol for early abortion. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2000; 5: 171–76.
  • Howie FL, Henshaw RC, Naji SA, Russell IT, Templeton AA. Medical abortion or vacuum aspiration? Two year follow up of a patient preference trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 829–33.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.