References
- Laptook A. Magnetic resonance: Safety considerations and future directions. Semin Perinatol 1990; 14: 189–92.
- Baker P, Johnson I, Harvey P, Gowland P, Mansfield P A three year follow-up of children imaged in utero using echoplanar magnetic resonance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170: 32–3.
- Johnson I Magnetic resonance imaging in obstetrics. Curr Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 5: 25–9.
- Baker P, Johnson I, Gowland P, Hykin J, Harvey P, Freeman A et al. Fetal weight estimation by echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging. Lancet 1994; 343: 644–5.
- Johnson I, Stehling M, Blamire A, Coxon R, Howseman A, Chapman B et al. Study of internal structure of the human fetus in utero by echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 601–7.
- Hata T, Makihara K, Aoki S, Hata K, Kitao M. Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetus: initial experience. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1990; 29: 255–8.
- Kischell E, Kehtarnavaz N, Hillman G, Levin H, Lilly M, Kent T. Classification of brain compartments and head injury lesions by neural networks applied to MRI. Neuroradiology 1995; 37: 535–41.
- Rubin G, Napel S, Leung A Volumetric analysis of volumetric data: achieving a paradigm shift. Radiology 1996; 200: 312–17.
- Hirata G, Medearis A, Horenstein J, Bear M, Platt L. Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight in the clinically macrosomic fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162 238–42.
- Johnstone F, Prescott R, Steel J, Mao J, Chambers S, Muir N. Clinical and ultrasound prediction of macrosomia in diabetic pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103: 74754.
- Neiger R. Fetal macrosomia in the diabetic patient. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1992; 35: 138–50.
- Shepard M, Richards V, Berkowitz R, Warsof S, Hobbins J. An evaluation of two equations for predicting fetal weight by ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynerol 1982; 142: 4754.
- Hadlock F, Harrist R, Sharman R, Deter R, Park S. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body and femur measurements - a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1935; 151: 333–7.
- Heinonen T, Dastidar P, Kauppinen P, Malmivuo J, Eskola H. Semi-automatic tool for segmentation and volumetric analysis of medical images. Med Biol Eng Comput 1998; 36: 291–6.
- Heinonen T, Eskola H, Dastidar P, Laame P, Malmivuo J. Segmentation of T1 MR scans for reconstruction of resistive models. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1997; 54: 173–8.
- Heinonen T, Dastidar P, Eskola H, Frey H, Ryymin P, Laa- sonen E. Applicability of semi-automatic segmentation for volumetric analysis of brain lesions. J Med Eng Technol 1998; 22: 173–8.
- Benacerraf B, Gelman R, Frigoletto F. Sonographically estimated fetal weights: Accuracy and limitation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159: 1118–21.
- Tamura R, Dooley S. The role of ultrasonography in the management of diabetic pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1991; 34: 526–34.
- Freeborough P, Fox N, Kitney R. Interactive algorithms for the segmentation and quantitation of 3-D MRI brain scans. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1997; 53: 1525.
- Robb R, Hanson D, Karwoski R, Larson A, Workman E, Stacy M. ANALYZE: a comprehensive, operator-interactive software package for multidimensional medical image display and analysis. Comput Med Imaging Graph 1989; 13: 433–54.
- Sundaramoorthy G, Hoford J, Hoffman E, Higgins W IMPROMPTU: a system for automatic 3D medical image analysis. Comput Med Imaging Graph 1995; 19: 131–43.
- Dastidar P, Heinonen T, Nurnminen T, Rautiainen M, Laa- sonen E. Semiautomatic segmentation of computed tomographic volumetric estimation of the nasal airway. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1999; 256: 192–8.
- Dastidar P, Heinonen T, Vahvelainen T, Elovaara I, Eskola H. Computerised volumetric analysis of lesions in multiple sclerosis using new semi-automatic segmentation software. Med Biol Eng Comput 1999; 37: 104–7.