Emergency cerclage in the presence of protruding membranes: is pregnancy outcome predictable?

References

• Novy MJ, Haymond J, Nichols M. Shirodkar cerclage in a multifactorial approach to the patient with advanced cervical changes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 1412–20.
   Google Scholar
• Kokia E, Dor J, Blankenstein J, Seidman DS, Lipitz S, Serr DM et al. A simple scoring system for the treatment of cervical incompetence diagnosed during the second trimester. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1991; 31: 12–16.
   Google Scholar
• Treadwell MC, Bronsteen RA, Bottoms SF. Prognostic factors and complication rates for cervical cerclage: a review of 482 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 555–8.
   Google Scholar
• Barth WH Jr. Cervical incompetence and cerclage: unresolved controversies. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1994; 37: 83141.
   Google Scholar
• Barth WH Jr, Yeomans ER, Hankins GDV Emergent cerclage. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990; 170: 323–6.
   Google Scholar
• Aarts JM, Brons JTJ, Bruinse HW Emergency cerclage: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1995; 50: 459–69.
   Google Scholar
• Higuchi M, Hirano H, Maki M. Emergency cervical cerclage using a metreurynter in patients with bulging membranes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1992; 71: 34–7.
   Google Scholar
• Yip SK, Fung HYM, Fung TK. Emergency cervical cerclage: A study between duration of cerclage in situ with gestational age, hernation of forewater, and cervical dilatation at presentation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 78: 63–7.
   Google Scholar
• Schorr SJ, Morales WJ. Obstetric management of incompetent cervix and bulging fetal membranes. J Reprod Med 1996; 41: 235–8.
   Google Scholar
• Lipitz S, Libshitz A, Oelsner G, Kokia E, Goldberg M, Mashiach S et al. Outcome of second trimester, emergency cervical cerclage in patients with no history of cervical incompetence. Am J Perinatol 1996; 13: 419–22.
   Google Scholar
• Forster FMC. Abortion and the incompetent cervix. Med J Aust 1967; 2: 807.
   Google Scholar
• Mitra AG, Katz VL, Bowes WA, Carmichael S. Emergency cerclages: a review of 40 consecutive procedures. Am J Per- inatol 1992; 9: 142–5.
   Google Scholar
• Shirodkar WN. A new method of operative treatment for habitual abortions in the second trimester of pregnancy. Antiseptic 1955; 52: 299–300.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald IA. Cervical cerclage. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1980; 7: 461–79.
   Google Scholar
• Hefner JD, Patow E, Ludwig JM. A new surgical procedure for the correction of the incompetent cervix during pregnancy. The Wurm procedure. Obstet Gynecol 1961; 18: 616–20.
   Google Scholar
• MacDougall J, Siddle N. Emergency cervical cerclage. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 98: 1234–8.
   Google Scholar
• Goodlin RC. Cervical incompetence, hourglass membranes, and amniocentesis. Obstet Gynecol 1979; 54: 74850.
   Google Scholar
• Hordnes K, Askvik K, Dalaker K. Emergency McDonald cerclage with application of stay sutures. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1996; 64: 43–9.
   Google Scholar
• Sharif K, Gee H. Emergency cervical cerclage. (Letter) Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 99: 529–30.
   Google Scholar
• Olatunbosun OA, Al-Nuaim L, Turnell RW Emergency cerclage compared with bed rest for advanced cervical dilatation in pregnancy. Int Surg 1995; 80: 170–4.
   Google Scholar
• Wu MY, Yang YS, Huang TY, Lee TY, Ho HN. Emergent and elective cervical cerclage for cervical incompetence. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1996; 54: 23–9.
   Google Scholar
• Romero R, Gonzales R, Sepulveda W, Brandt F, Ramirez M, Sorokin Y et al. Infection and labor. VIII. Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity in patients with suspected cervical incompetence: Prevalence and clinical significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167: 1086–91.
   Google Scholar
• Guzman ER, Houlihan C, Vintizelos A, Ivan J, Benito C, Kappy K. The significance of transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix in women treated with emergency cerclage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175: 471–6.
   Google Scholar