Intrauterine insemination with donor semen. An evaluation of prognostic factors based on a review of 1131 cycles

References

• New guidelines for the use of semen donor insemination: 1990. The American Fertility Society. Fertil Steril 1990; 53 (Suppl 1): 1S–13S.
   Google Scholar
• DiMarzo SJ, Huang J, Kennedy JF, Villanueva B, Hebert SA, Young PE. Pregnancy rates with fresh versus computer-controlled cryopreserved semen for artificial insemination by donor in a private practice setting. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 1483–8.
   Google Scholar
• Ford WC, Mathur RS, Hull MG. Intrauterine insemination: is it an effective treatment for male factor infertility? Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 11: 691–710.
   Google Scholar
• Chaffkin LM, Nulsen JC, Luciano AA, Metzger DA. A comparative analysis of the cycle fecundity rates associated with combined human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) and intrauterine insemination (IUI) versus either hMG or IUI alone. Fertil Steril 1991; 55: 252–7.
   Google Scholar
• Sidhu RS, Sharma RK, Agarwal A. Effects of cryopreserved semen quality and timed intrauterine insemination on pregnancy rate and gender of offspring in a donor insemination program. J Assist Reprod Genet 1997; 14: 531–7.
   Google Scholar
• Pittrof RU, Shaker A, Dean N, Bekir JS, Campbell S, Tan SL. Success of intrauterine insemination using cryopreserved donor sperm is related to the age of the woman and the number of preovulatory follicles. J Assist Reprod Genet 1996; 13: 310–14.
   Google Scholar
• Depypere HT, Gordts S, Campo R, Comhaire F. Methods to increase the success rate of artificial insemination with donor semen. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 661–3.
   Google Scholar
• Horne G, Jamaludin A, Critchlow JD, Falconer DA, Newman MC, Oghoetuoma J et al. A 3 year retrospective review of intrauterine insemination, using cryopreserved donor spermatozoa and cycle monitoring by urinary or serum luteinizing hormone measurements. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 3045–8.
   Google Scholar
• Kang BM, Wu TC. Effect of age on intrauterine insemination with frozen donor sperm. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88: 93–8.
   Google Scholar
• Pistorius LR, Kruger TF, de Villiers A, van der Merwe JP A comparative study using prepared and unprepared frozen semen for donor insemination. Arch Androl 1996; 36: 81–6.
   Google Scholar
• Stone BA, Vargyas JM, Ringler GE, Stein AL, Marrs RP. Determinants of the outcome of intrauterine insemination:analysis of outcomes of 9963 consecutive cycles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180: 1522–34.
   Google Scholar
• Patton PE, Burry KA, Thurmond A, Novy MJ, Wolf DP Intrauterine insemination outperforms intracervical insemination in a randomized, controlled study with frozen donor semen. Fertil Steril 1992; 57: 559–64.
   Google Scholar
• Goldfarb JM, Peskin B, Austin C, Lisbona H. Evaluation of predictive factors for multiple pregnancies during gonadotropin/IUI treatment. J Assist Reprod Genet 1997; 14: 88–91.
   Google Scholar
• Navot D, Goldstein N, Mor-Josef S, Simon A, Relou A, Birkenfeld A. Multiple pregnancies: risk factors and prognostic variables during induction of ovulation with human menopausal gonadotrophins. Hum Reprod 1991; 6: 1152–5.
   Google Scholar
• Stanger JD, Yovich JL. Reduced in-vitro fertilization of human oocytes from patients with raised basal luteinizing hormone levels during the follicular phase. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985; 92: 385–93.
   Google Scholar
• Check JH, Adelson H, Lurie D, Jamison T. Effect of the short follicular phase on subsequent conception. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1992; 34: 180–3.
   Google Scholar
• Dodson WC, Haney AF Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treatment of infertility. Fertil Steril 1991; 55: 457–67.
   Google Scholar
• Horvath PM, Bohrer M, Shelden RM, Kemmann E. The relationship of sperm parameters to cycle fecundity in superovulated women undergoing intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 1989; 52: 288–94.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez AR, Bernardus RE, Voorhorst FJ, Vermeiden JP, Schoemaker J. Pregnancy rates after timed intercourse or intrauterine insemination after human menopausal gonadotropin stimulation of normal ovulatory cycles: a controlled study. Fertil Steril 1991; 55: 258–65.
   Google Scholar
• Silverberg KM, Johnson JV Olive DL, Burns WN, Schenken RS. A prospective, randomized trial comparing two different intrauterine insemination regimens in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles. Fertil Steril 1992; 57: 357–61.
   Google Scholar
• Ransom MX, Blotner MB, Bohrer M, Corsan G, Kemmann E. Does increasing frequency of intrauterine insemination improve pregnancy rates significantly during superovulation cycles? Fertil Steril 1994; 61: 303–7.
   Google Scholar
• Khalifa Y, Redgment CJ, Tsirigotis M, Grudzinskas JG, Craft IL. The value of single versus repeated insemination in intra-uterine donor insemination cycles. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 153–4.
   Google Scholar
• Karlström PO, Bergh T, Lundkvist Ö. Addition of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist and/or two inseminations with husband’s sperm do not improve the pregnancy rate in superovulated cycles. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000; 79: 37–42.
   Google Scholar
• Hock DL, Bohrer MK, Ananth CV, Kemmann E. Sonographic assessment of endometrial pattern and thickness in patients treated with clomiphene citrate, human menopausal gonadotropins, and intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 1997; 68: 242–5.
   Google Scholar
• Chang MY, Huang HY, Lee CL, Lai YM, Chang SY, Soong YK. Treatment of infertility using controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with intrauterine insemination: the experience of 343 cases. J Formos Med Assoc 1993; 92: 341–8.
   Google Scholar
• Dickey RP, Dickey RP, Olar TT, Curole DN, Taylor SN, Rye PH et al. Endometrial pattern and thickness associated with pregnancy outcome after assisted reproduction technologies. Hum Reprod 1992; 7: 418–21.
   Google Scholar