References
- Kolderup L, McLean L, Grullon K, Safford K, Kilpatrick SJ. Misoprostol is more efficacious for labor induction than prostaglandin E2, but is it associated with more risk? [see comments]. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180: 1543–50.
- Danielian P, Porter B, Ferri N, Summers J, Templeton A. Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel [see comments]. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 793–7.
- Nunes F, Rodrigues R, Meirinho M. Randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 626–9.
- Wing DA. Labor induction with misoprostol. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 339–45.
- Blanchette HA, Nayak S, Erasmus S. Comparison of the safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol (prostaglandin E1) with those of dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2) for cervical ripening and induction of labor in a community hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180: 1551–9.
- Hofmeyr GJ, Gulmezoglu AM, Alfirevic Z. Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 798–803.
- Alfirevic Z, Howarth G, Gaussmann A. Oral misoprostol for induction of labour with a viable fetus. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2000; 2: CD001338.
- Hofmeyr GJ, Gulmezoglu AM. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labour induction in late pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2000; 2: CD000941.
- Hofmeyr GJ, Gulmezoglu AM. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labour induction in late pregnancy. Birth 1999; 26: 264.
- Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM, Wears RL, Delke I, Gaudier FL. Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 633–42.
- Lemancewicz A, Urban R, Skotnicki MZ, Karpiuk A, Urban J. Uterine and fetal Doppler flow changes after misoprostol and oxytocin therapy for induction of labor in post-term pregnancies. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1999; 67: 139–45.