References
- Altman, D G, Schulz, K F, Moher, D, Egger, M, Davidoff, F, Elbourne, D, Gotzche, P C, Lang, T. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2001; 134:663–694. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Reid, M C, Lachs, M S, Feinstein, A R. Use of methodological standards in diagnostic research: getting better but still not good. JAMA 1995; 274:645–651. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF]
- Arrol, B, Schechter, M T, Sheps, S B. The assessment of diagnostic tests: a comparison of medical literature in 1982 and 1985. J Gen Intern Med 1988; 3:443–447.
- Sheps, S B, Schechter, M T. The assessment of diagnostic tests: a survey of current medical research. JAMA 1984; 252:2418–2422. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF]
- Heffner, J E, Feinstein, D, Barbieri, C. Methodologic standards for diagnostic test research in pulmonary medicine. Chest 1998; 114:877–885. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE]
- Harper, R, Reeves, B. Reporting of precision of estimates for diagnostic accuracy: a review. BMJ 1999; 318:1322–1323. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE]
- Honest, H, Khan, K S. Reporting of measures of accuracy in systematic reviews of diagnostic literature. BMC Health Serv Res 2002; 2:4, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
- Bossuyt, P M, Reitsma, J B, Bruns, D E, Gatsonis, C A, Glasziou, P P, Irwig, L M, Lijmer, J G, Moher, D, Rennie, D, de Vet, H CW. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. BMJ 2003; 326:41–44. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF]
- Bossuyt, P M, Reitsma, J B, Bruns, D E, Gatsonis, C A, Glasziou, P P, Irwig, L M, Moher, D, Rennie, D, de Vet, H CW, Lijmer, J G. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Clin Chem 2003; 49:7–18. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
- Gallagher, E J. Clinical utility of likelihood ratios. Ann Emer Med 1998; 31:391–397. [CSA]
- Fagan, T J. Nomogram for Bayes' theorem. New Engl J Med 1975; 293:257, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE]
- Hayden, S R, Brown, M D. Likelihood ratio: a powerful tool for incorporating the results of a diagnostic test into clinical decision making. Ann Emer Med 1999; 33:575–580. [CSA]
- Dujardin, B, Van den Ende, J, Van Gompel, A. Unger JPVdSP. Likelihood ratios: a real improvment for clinical decision making? Eur J Epidemiol 1994; 10:29–36. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Blume, J D. Likelihood methods for measuring statistical evidence. Stat Med 2002; 21:2563–2599. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF]
- Deeks, J J. Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. BMJ 2001; 323:157–162. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF]
- Boissel, J P, Cucherat, M. The meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies. Eur Radiol 1998; 8:484–487. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
- Irwig, L, Tosteson, A, Gatsonis, C, Lau, J, Colditz, G, Chalmers, T C, Mosteller, F. Guidelines for meta-analyses evaluating diagnostic tests. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120:667–676. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Zhou, X H, Obuchowski, N A, McClish, D K. Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine. Wiley: New York, 2002.
- Zweig, M H, Campbell, G. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem 1993; 39:561–577. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE]
- Irwig, L, Bossuyt, P, Glasziou, P, Gatsonis, C, Lijmer, J. Designing studies to ensure that estimates of test accuracy are transferable. BMJ 2002; 324:669–671. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF]
- Rumack, B H, Matthew, H. Acetaminophen poisoning and toxicity. Pediatrics 1975; 55:871–876. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE]
- Prescott, L F, Roscoe, P, Wright, N, Brown, S S. Plasma-paracetamol half-life and hepatic necrosis in patients with paracetamol overdosage. Lancet 1971; i:519–522. [CROSSREF]
- Knottnerus, J A, van Weel, C, Muris, J. Evaluation of diagnostic procedures. BMJ 2002; 324:477–480. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF]
- Sackett, D L, Haynes, R B. The architecture of diagnostic research. BMJ 2002; 324:539–541. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF]
- Knottnerus, J A, Leffers, P. The influence of referral patterns on the characteristics of diagnostic tests. J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45:1143–1154. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF]
- Bailey, B, Amre, D K, Gaudreault, P. A meta-analysis of prognostic criteria determining need for liver transplantation in patients with fulminant hepatic failure secondary to acetaminophen poisoning. Crit Care Med 2003; 203:299–305. [CROSSREF]
- Daya, S. Study design for the evaluation of diagnostic tests. Semin Reprod Endocrinol 1996; 14:101–109. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Joseph, L, Gyorkos, T W, Coupal, L. Bayesian estimation of disease prevalence and the parameters of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard. Am J Epidemiol 1995; 141:263–272. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Bailey, B, Buckley, N, Amre, D. A meta-analysis of prognostic indicators to predict seizures, arrhythmias or death after tricyclic antidepressant overdose. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42:877–888. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF]
- Obuchowski, N A. Sample size calculations in studies of test accuracy. Stat Methods Med Res 1998; 7:371–392. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]
- Whiting, P, Rutjes, A, Reitsma, J B, Glas, A S, Bossuyt, P, Kleijnen, J. Sources of variation and bias in studies of diagnostic accuracy. A systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2004; 140:189–202. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE]
- Done, A K. Salicylate intoxication. Significance of measurements of salicylate in blood in cases of acute ingestion. Pediatrics 1960; 26:800–807. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE]
- Lijmer, J G, Mol, B W, Heisterkamp, S, Bonsel, G J, Prins, M H, van der Meulen, J HP, Bossuyt, P MM. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA 1999; 282:1061–1066. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF]
- Anand, A, Nightindale, P, Neuberger, J. Early indicators of prognosis in fulminant hepatic failure: an assessment of the king's criteria. J Hepatol 1997; 26:62–68. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF]
- Jaeschke, R, Guyatt, G, Sackett, D L. User's guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. A. Are the results of the study valid? JAMA 1994; 271:389–391. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF]
- Mulrow, C D, Linn, W D, Gaul, M K, Pugh, J A. Assessing quality of a diagnostic test evaluation. J Gen Intern Med 1989; 4:288–295. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE]
- Guyatt, G H, Tugwell, P X, Feeny, D H, Haynes, R B, Drummond, M. A framework for clinical evaluation of diagnostic technologies. CMAJ 1986; 134:587–594. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE]
- Greenhalgh, T. How to read a paper: papers that report diagnostic or screening tests. BMJ 1997; 315:540–543. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE]
- Whiting, P, Rutjes, A, Reitsma, J B, Bossuyt, P, Kleijnen, J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003; 3:25, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF], [CSA]