Mucoadhesive Delivery Systems. II. Formulation and In‐Vitro/In‐Vivo Evaluation of Buccal Mucoadhesive Tablets Containing Water‐Soluble Drugs

References

• Shojaei A. H. Buccal mucosa as a route for systemic drug delivery: a review. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 1998; 1(1)15–30, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rathbone M. J., Hadgraft J. Absorption of drugs from the human oral cavity. Int. J. Pharm. 1991; 74: 9–24, [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan M. Z.I. Recent trends and progress in sustained or controlled oral delivery of some water‐soluble drugs: morphine salts, diltiazem and captopril. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 1995; 21(9)1037–1070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyazaki S., Nakayama A., Oda M., Takada M., Attwood D. Chitosan and sodium alginate based bioadhesive tablets for intraoral drug delivery. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 1994; 17: 745–747, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyazaki S., Kawasaki N., Nakamura T., Iwatsu M., Hayashi T., Hou W. M., Attwood D. Oral mucosal bioadhesive tablets of pectin and hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose: in‐vitro and in‐vivo evaluation. Int. J. Pharm. 2000; 204(1–2)127–132, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ahuja A., Dogra M., Agarwal S. P. Development of buccal tablets of diltiazem hydrochloride. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 1995; 57(1)26–30
   Google Scholar
• Garcia‐Gonzalez N., Blanco‐Fuente H., Anguiano‐Igea S., Delgado‐Charro B., Otero‐Espinar F. J., Blanco‐Mendez J. In‐vitro characterization of bioadhesive metoclopramide tablets for buccal application prepared with poly (acrylic acid) and hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose. STP Pharma Sci. 1992; 2(6)494–499
   Google Scholar
• Garcia‐Gonzalez N., Kellaway I. W., Blanco‐Fuente H., Anguiano‐Igea S., Delgado‐Charro B., Otero‐Espinar F. J., Blanco‐Mendez J. Design and evaluation of buccoadhesive metoclopramide hydrogels composed of poly (acrylic acid) cross‐linked with sucrose. Int. J. Pharm. 1993; 100: 65–70, [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia‐Gonzalez N., Kellaway I. W., Blanco‐Fuente H., Anguiano‐Igea S., Delgado‐Charro B., Otero‐Espinar F. J., Blanco‐Mendez J. Influence of beta‐cyclodextrin concentration and poly (acrylic acid) molecular weight on swelling and release characteristics of metoclopramide‐containing hydrogels. Int. J. Pharm. 1993; 100: 25–31, [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nafee N. A., Ismail F. A., Boraie N. A., Mortada L. A. Design and characterization of mucoadhesive buccal patches containing cetylpyridinium chloride. Acta Pharm. 2003; 53: 199–212, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bouckaert S., Remon J. P. In‐vitro bioadhesion of a buccal, miconazole slow release tablets. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1993; 45: 504–507, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan L. S.C., Heng P. W.S., Wong L. F. Relationship between swelling and drug release in a hydrophilic matrix. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 1993; 19(10)1201–1210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W.‐G., Hwang G. C.‐C. Adhesive and in‐vitro release characteristics of propranolol bioadhesive disc system. Int. J. Pharm. 1992; 82: 61–66, [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez‐Marcos B., Ford J. L., Armstrong D. J., Elliott P. N.C., Roston C., Hogan J. E. Release of propranolol hydrochloride from matrix tablets containing hydroxy propylmethyl cellulose K4M and carbopol 974. Int. J. Pharm. 1994; 111: 251–259, [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panomsuk S. P., Hatanaka T., Aiba T., Katayama K., Koizumi T. A study of the hydrophilic cellulose matrix: effect of indomethacin and a water‐soluble additive on release mechanisms. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1995; 43(6)994–999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindner W. D., Lippold B. C. Drug release from hydrocolloid embeddings with high or low susceptibility to hydrodynamic stress. Pharm. Res. 1995; 12(11)1781–1785, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braveja S. K., Ranga Rao K. V., Devi K. P. Zero‐order release hydrophilic matrix tablets of beta‐adrenergic blockers. Int. J. Pharm. 1987; 39: 39–45, [CROSSREF]
   Google Scholar
• Ponchel G., Touchard F., Duchene D., Peppas N. A. Bioadhesive analysis of controlled release systems. I. Fracture and interpenetration analysis in PAA‐containing systems. J. Control. Release 1987; 5: 129–141, [CROSSREF]
   Google Scholar
• Feely L. C., Devis S. S. The influence of polymeric excipients on the drug release from HPMC matrices. Int. J. Pharm. 1988; 44: 131–139, [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranga Rao K. V., Devi P. K., Buri P. Influence of molecular size and water solubility of solute on its release from swelling and errossion controlled polymeric matressis. J. Control. Release 1990; 12(4)133–141
   Google Scholar
• Bottenberg P., Cleymaet R., De Muyncha C., Remon J. P., Coomans D., Slop D. Comparison of salivary fluoride concentration after administration of a bioadhesive slow‐release tablet and a conventional fluoride tablet. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1992; 44: 684–686, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumtaz A. M., Ch'ng H. S. Evaluation of bioadhesive buccal tablets containing triamcinolone acetonide in healthy volunteers. Int. J. Pharm. 1995; 121: 249–254, [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar