ANGIOTENSIN SENSITIVITY TEST REVISITED

REFERENCES

• Talledo O E. Renin–angiotensin system in normal and toxemic pregnancies.I. Angiotensin infusion test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1966; 96: 141–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gant N F, Daley G L, Chand S, Whalley P J. A study of angiotensin II pressor response throughout primigravidpregnancy. J Clin Invest 1973; 52: 2682–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conde-Anguledo A, Lede R, Belizán J. Evaluation of methods used in the prediction of hypertensivedisorders of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Survey 1994; 49: 210–2
   Google Scholar
• Jaspers W JM, de Jong P A, Mulder A W. Decrease of angiotensin sensitivity after bed rest and stronglysodium-restricted diet. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 145: 792–6
   Google Scholar
• van Buul B JA, Steegers E AP, van der Maten G D, Delemarre F MC, Jongsma H W, Oosterbaan H P, et al. Dietary sodium restriction does not prevent gestational hypertension:a Dutch two-center randomized trial. Hypertens Pregn 1997; 16: 335–46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delemarre F MC, Didden M AL, de Jong P A. Diurnal variation in angiotensin sensitivity in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174: 259–261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davey D A, MacGillivray I. The classification and definition of the hypertensive disordersof pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 158: 892–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris J A, O'Grady J P, Hamilton C J, Davidson E C. Vascular reactivity to angiotensin II infusion during gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1978; 130: 379–84
   Google Scholar
• Zamora Orozco J, Shor Pinsker V, de Jesús Hernández HM, Karchmer K S. Valor de la prueba de la angiotensina II y del “roll overtest” como métodos predictivos de la enfermedad hipertensivaaguda del embarazo (preeclampsia y eclampsia). Ginecol Obstet Méx 1979; 46: 235–44
   Google Scholar
• Öney T, Kaulhausen H. The value of the angiotensin sensitivity test in the early diagnosisof hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 142: 17–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura T, Ito N, Matsui K, Yoshimura T, Kawasaki N, Maeyama M. Significance of angiotensin sensitivity test for predictionof pregnancy-induced hypertension. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 67: 388–94
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dekker G A, Makowitz J W, Wallenburg H CS. Prediction of pregnancy-induced hypertensive disorders. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97: 817–21
   Google Scholar
• Kyle P M, Buckley D, Kissane J, de Swiet M, Redman C WG. The angiotensin sensitivity test and low-dose aspirin are ineffectivemethods to predict and prevent hypertensive disorders in nulliparous pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173: 865–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heistad D D, Abboud F M, Ballard D R. Relation between plasma sodium concentration and vascular reactivityin man. J Clin Invest 1971; 50: 2022–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gant N F, Chand S, Whalley P J, MacDonald P C. The nature of pressor responsiveness to angiotensin II in humanpregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1974; 43: 854–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker G A. Prediction of pregnancy-induced hypertension. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1991; 42: S36–S44
   Google Scholar
• Dekker G A, Sibai B M. Early detection of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 160–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gant N F, Jimenez J M, Whalley P J, Chand S, MacDonald PC. A prospective study of angiotensin II pressor responsivenessin pregnancies complicated by chronic essential hypertension. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1977; 127: 369–75
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abdul-Karim R, Assali NS. Pressor response to angiotonin in pregnant and nonpregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1961; 82: 246–51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gant N, S Chand, Cunningham S G, MacDonald P C. Control of vascular reactivity to angiotensin II infusion in pregnancy, M D Lindheimer, A I Katz, F P Zuspan. JohnWiley & Sons, New York 1976; 377–89, Hypertension in Pregnancy
   Google Scholar
• Kaulhausen H, Öney T, Niesert S. Angiotensin sensitivity during late pregnancy: clinical relevanceand modulation by drugs. Clin Exp Hypertens 1988; B7: 165–70
   Google Scholar
• Kaulhausen H, Öney T, Leyendecker G. Relationshipof angiotensin sensitivity to sodium excretion, renin–aldosterone axisand to progesterone in late pregnancy, J Bonnar, I MacGillivray, E M Symonds. MTPPress United, Lancaster 1980; 87–91, Pregnancy Hypertension
   Google Scholar
• Brown M A, Nicholson E, Gallery E DM. Sodium–renin–aldosterone relations in normal andhypertensive pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 95: 1237–46
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steegers E AP. Salt and pregnancy: some aspects of sodium balance during pregnancyand the (patho)physiologic implications of dietary sodium restriction. CatholicUniversity, Nijmegen 1990, PhD thesis
   Google Scholar
• Lee M I, Hobel C J, Todd H M, Oakes G K. Dietary sodium manipulation and vascular responsiveness duringpregnancy in the rabbit. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 146: 930–4
   Google Scholar
• Olsson K, Dahlborn K, Karlbergh B E. Blood pressure response to angiotensin II in pregnant and lactatinggoats maintained on high or low sodium intake. Acta Physiol Scand 1987; 129: 73–80
   Google Scholar
• Brunner H R, Chang P, Wallach R, Sealey J E, Laragh J H. Angiotensin II vascular receptors: their avidity in relationshipto sodium balance, the autonomic nervous system, and hypertension. J Clin Invest 1972; 51: 58–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everett R B, Worley R J, MacDonald P C, Gant N F. Modification of vascular responsiveness to angiotensin II inpregnant women by intravenously infused 5a-dihydroprogesterone. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1978; 131: 352–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaspers W JM, de Jong P A, Mulder A W. Angiotensin-II sensitivity and prosta-glandin–synthetaseinhibition in pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1981; 11: 379–84
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Öney T, Kaulhausen H. Effect of angiotensin infusion during pregnancy on fetal heartrate and on fetal activity. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Biol 1982; 13: 133–7
   Google Scholar
• Wallenburg H CS, Dekker G A, Makowitz J W, Rotmans P. Low-dose aspirin prevents pregnancy-induced hypertension andpre-eclampsia in angiotensin-sensitive primigravidae. Lancet 1986; I: 1–3
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Ramos L, O'Sullivan M J, Garrido-Calderon J. Effect of low-dose aspirin on angiotensin II pressor responsein human pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 156: 193–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown C EL, Gant N F, Cox K, Spitz B, Rosenfeld C R, Magness R R. Low-dose aspirin. II. Relationship of angiotensin II pressorresponse, circulating eicosanoids, and pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 1853–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adair C D, Sanchez-Ramos L, Briones D L, Ogburn J. The effect of high dietary n-3 fatty acid supplementation onangiotensin II pressor response in human pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175: 688–91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kyle P M, Campbell S, Buckley D, Kissane J, de Swiet M, Albano J. A comparison of the inactive urinary kallikrein:creatinine ratioand the angiotensin sensitivity test for the prediction of pre-eclampsia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103: 981–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Delemarre F MC, de Jong D, Didden M AL, de Jong P A. Effect of angiotensin infusion on plasma endothelin in pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1998; 77: 33–5
   Google Scholar