100
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original

COMPARISON OF PORTAPRES® WITH STANDARD SPHYGMOMANOMETRY IN PREGNANCY

, , , , &
Pages 65-76 | Published online: 07 Jul 2009

REFERENCES

  • Imholz B. P., Langewouters G. J., van Montfrans G. A., Parati G., van Goudoever J., Wesseling K. H., Wieling W., Mancia G. Feasibility of Ambulatory, Continuous 24-Hour Finger Arterial Pressure Recording. Hypertension 1993; 21(1)65–73
  • Omboni S., Parati G., Castiglioni P., Di Rienzo M., Imholz B. P., Langewouters G. J., Wesseling K. H., Mancia G. Estimation of Blood Pressure Variability From 24-Hour Ambulatory Finger Blood Pressure. Hypertension 1998; 32(1)52–58
  • Imholz B. P., Wieling W., van Montfrans G. A., Wesseling K. H. Fifteen Years' Experience with Finger Arterial Pressure Monitoring: Assessment of the Technology. Cardiovasc. Res. 1998; 38(3)605–616
  • Molhoek G. P., Wesseling K. H., Settels J. J., van Vollenhoven E., Weeda H. W., deWit B., Arntzenius A. C. Evaluation of the Penaz Servo-Plethysmo-Manometer for the Continuous, Non-invasive Measurement of Finger Blood Pressure. Basic Res. Cardiol. 1984; 79(5)598–609
  • Wesseling K. H., Settels J. J., van der Hoeven G. M., Nijboer J. A., Butijn M. W., Dorlas J. C. Effects of Peripheral Vasoconstriction on the Measurement of Blood Pressure in a Finger. Cardiovasc. Res. 1985; 19(3)139–145
  • Imholz B. P., van Montfrans G. A., Settels J. J., van der Hoeven G. M., Karemaker J. M., Wieling W. Continuous Non-invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring: Reliability of Finapres Device During the Valsalva Manoeuvre. Cardiovasc. Res. 1988; 22(6)390–397
  • Parati G., Casadei R., Groppelli A., Di Rienzo M., Mancia G. Comparison of Finger and intraarterial Blood Pressure Monitoring at Rest and During Laboratory Testing. Hypertension 1989; 13(6 Pt. 1)647–655
  • Bos W. J., van Goudoever J., van Montfrans G. A., van den Meiracker A. H., Wesseling K. H. Reconstruction of Brachial Artery Pressure from Noninvasive Finger Pressure Measurements. Circulation 1996; 94(8)1870–1875
  • Easterling T. R., Benedetti T. J., Schmucker B. C., Millard S. P. Maternal Hemodynamics in Normal and Preeclamptic Pregnancies: A Longitudinal Study. Obstet. Gynecol. 1990; 76(6)1061–1069
  • van Oppen A. C., van der Tweel I., Alsbach G. P., Heethaar R. M., Bruinse H. W. A Longitudinal Study of Maternal Hemodynamics During Normal Pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. 1996; 88(1)40–46
  • Nichols W. W., O'Rourke M. F. McDonald's Blood Flow in Arteries. Theoretical, Experimental and Clinical Principles3rd Ed. Edward Arnold, , London 1990
  • Redman C. W. Eclampsia Still Kills. Br. Med. J. (Clin. Res. Ed.) 1988; 296(6631)1209–1210
  • Perry I. J., Wilkinson L. S., Shinton R. A., Beevers D. G. Conflicting Views on the Measurement of Blood Pressure in Pregnancy. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1991; 98(3)241–243
  • Pickering T. G. Ambulatory Monitoring and Blood Pressure Variability. Science Press, , London 1990
  • Perloff D., Grim C., Flack J., Frohlich E. D., Hill M., McDonald M., Morgenstern B. Z. Human Blood Pressure Determination by Sphygmomanometry. Circulation 1993; 88(5 Pt. 1)2460–2470
  • Frohlich E. D. Recommendations for Blood Pressure Determination by Sphygmomanometry. Ann. Intern. Med. 1988; 109(8)612
  • Bailey R. H., Bauer J. H. A Review of Common Errors in the Indirect Measurement of Blood Pressure. Sphygmomanometry. Arch. Intern. Med. 1993; 153(24)2741–2748
  • Peek M., Shennan A., Halligan A., Lambert P. C., Taylor D. J., De Swiet M. Hypertension in Pregnancy: Which Method of Blood Pressure Measurement is Most Predictive of Outcome?. Obstet. Gynecol. 1996; 88(6)1030–1033
  • Penny J. A., Halligan A. W., Shennan A. H., Lambert P. C., Jones D. R., de Swiet M., Taylor D. J. Automated, Ambulatory, or Conventional Blood Pressure Measurement in Pregnancy: Which is the Better Predictor of Severe Hypertension?. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1998; 178(3)521–526
  • Franx A., van der Post J. A., Elfering I. M., Veerman D. P., Merkus H. M., Boer K., van Montfrans G. A. Validation of Automated Blood Pressure Recording in Pregnancy. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1994; 101(1)66–69
  • O'Brien E., Petrie J., Littler W., de Swiet M., Padfield P. L., Altman D. G., Bland M., Coats A., Atkins N. An Outline of the Revised British Hypertension Society Protocol for the Evaluation of Blood Pressure Measuring Devices. J. Hypertens. 1993; 11(6)677–679
  • White W. B., Berson A. S., Robbins C., Jamieson M. J., Prisant L. M., Roccella E., Sheps S. G. National Standard for Measurement of Resting and Ambulatory Blood Pressures with Automated Sphygmomanometers. Hypertension 1993; 21(4)504–509
  • Penáz J. Photoelectric Measurement of Blood Pressure, Volume and Flow in the Finger. Digest 10th International Conference of Medical Biological Engineering, Dresden. 1973; 104
  • Wesseling K. H. Finapres, Continuous Noninvasive Finger Arterial Pressure Based on the Method of Penáz. Blood Pressure Measurement, W. Meyer-Sabellek, M. Anlauf, R. Gotzen, L. Steinfeld. Steinkopff Verlag, , Darmstadt 1990; 161–172
  • Epstein R. H., Huffnagle S., Bartkowski R. R. Comparative Accuracies of a Finger Blood Pressure Monitor and an Oscillometric Blood Pressure Monitor. J. Clin. Monit. 1991; 7(2)161–167
  • Gizdulich P., Wesseling K. H. Reconstruction of Brachial Arterial Pulsation from Finger Arterial Pressure. Proc. 12th Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Biol. Soc. 1990; 12: 1046–1047
  • Bland J. M., Altman D. G. Statistical Methods for Assessing Agreement Between Two Methods of Clinical Measurement. Lancet 1986; 1(8476)307–310
  • Wilkes M. P., Bennett A., Hall P., Lewis M., Clutton-Brock T. H. Comparison of Invasive and Non-invasive Measurement of Continuous Arterial Pressure Using the Finapres in Patients Undergoing Spinal Anaesthesia for Lower Segment Caesarean Section. Br. J. Anaesth. 1994; 73(6)738–743
  • Porter K. B., O'Brien W. F., Kiefert V., Knuppel R. A. Finapres: A Noninvasive Device to Monitor Blood Pressure. Obstet. Gynecol. 1991; 78(3 Pt. 1)430–433
  • Brown M. A., Reiter L., Smith B., Buddle M. L., Morris R., Whitworth J. A. Measuring Blood Pressure in Pregnant Women: A Comparison of Direct and Indirect Methods. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1994; 171(3)661–667

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.