Comparison of Adsorption Dynamics in Kinetic and Equilibrium Beds in Hydrogen Ternary System

REFERENCES

• Ruthven, D.M. Pressure Swing Adsorption; VCH: New York, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, R.T. Gas Separation by Adsorption Processes; Butterworths: Boston, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.D.; Yang, R.T.; Uawithya, P. Diffusion of oxygen, nitrogen and their mixtures in carbon molecular sieve. AIChE J. 1994, 40 (4), 577–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae, Y.-S.; Lee, C.-H. Sorption kinetics of eight gases on a carbon molecular sieve at elevated pressure: Part I. Experimental. Carbon 2004, in revision.
   Google Scholar
• Kapoor, A.; Yang, R.T. Kinetic separation of methane-carbon dioxide mixture by adsorption on molecular sieve carbon. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1989, 44 (8), 1723–1733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kikkinides, E.S.; Yang, R.T.; Cho, S.H. Concentration and recovery of CO2 from flue gas by pressure swing adsorption. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1993, 32, 2714–2720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sircar, S.; Kumar, R. Adiabatic adsorption of bulk binary gas mixtures. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 1983, 22, 271–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sircar, S.; Kumar, R. Column dynamics for adsorption of bulk binary gas mixtures on activated carbon. Sep. Sci. Technol. 1986, 21, 919–939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, K.S.; Jun, J.H.; Lee, W.K. Fixed-bed adsorption for bulk component system. Non-equilibrium, non-isothermal, and non-adiabatic model. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1995, 50 (5), 813–825.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, J.A.C.; Rodrigues, A.E. Fixed-bed adsorption of two linearly adsorbed components in presence of an inert. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1998, 53 (20), 3513–3520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J.; Lee, C.-H. Adsorption dynamics of a layered bed PSA for H2 recovery from coke oven gas. AIChE J. 1998, 44 (6), 1325–1334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooq, S.; Ruthven, D.M. Dynamics of kinetically controlled binary adsorption in a fixed bed. AIChE J. 1991, 37 (2), 299–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J.-H.; Kim, J.-N.; Cho, S.-H.; Kim, J.-D.; Yang, R.T. Adsorber dynamics and optimal design of layered beds for multicomponent gas adsorption. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1998, 53 (23), 3951–3963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn, H.; Chun, C.; Park, M.; Ahn, I.-S.; Lee, C.-H. Thermal effects on the breakthrough curve of a hydrogen ternary system at a fixed bed. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2001, 36 (10), 2117–2141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, R.; Farooq, S. Numerical Simulation of Kinetically Controlled Bulk PSA Separation Process Based on a Bidisperse Pore Diffusion Model, Proceedings of the 8th APCChE Congress, 1999. 3, 1753–1756.
   Google Scholar
• PSE Ltd. gPROMS Introductory User Guide; Bridge Studios: London. 2002. Release 2.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Jee, J.-G.; Kim, M.-B.; Lee, C.-H. Adsorption characteristics of hydrogen mixtures in a layered bed: binary, ternary, and five-component mixtures. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40 (3), 868–878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C.-H.; Yang, J.; Ahn, H. Effect of carbon-to-zeolite ratio on layered bed H2 PSA for coke oven gas. AIChE J. 1999, 45 (3), 535–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doong, S.J.; Yang, R.T. Bulk separation of multicomponent gas mixtures by pressure swing adsorption: pore/Surface diffusion and equilibrium models. AIChE J. 1986, 32 (3), 397–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, R.B.; Stewart, W.E.; Lightfoot, E.N. Transport Phenomena; Wiley: New York, 1960.
   Google Scholar
• Jee, J.-G.; Park, H.-J.; Haam, S.-J.; Lee, C.-H. Effects of nonisobaric and isobaric steps on O2 PSA for aerator. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, 41 (17), 4383–4392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooq, S.; Ruthven, D.M. Numerical simulation of a kinetically controlled pressure swing adsorption bulk separation process based on a diffusion model. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1991, 46 (9), 2213–2224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooq, S.; Rathor, M.N.; Hidajat, K. A. Predictive model for a kinetically controlled pressure swing adsorption separation process. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1993, 48 (24), 4129–4141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishna, R.; Wesselingh, J.A. The Maxwell-Stefan approach to mass transfer. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1997, 52 (16). 861–911.
   Google Scholar
• Van Den Broeke, L.J.P.; Krishna, R. Experimental verification of the Maxwell-Stefan theory for micropore diffusion. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1995, 50 (16), 2507–2522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishna, R. Multicomponent surface diffusion of adsorbed species: a description based on the generalized maxwell-stefan equations. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1990, 45 (7), 1779–1791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackley, M.W.; Yang, R.T. Kinetic separation by pressure swing adsorption: method of characteristics model. AIChE J. 1990, 36 (8), 1229–1238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Do, D.D. A model for surface diffusion of ethane and propane in activated carbon. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1996, 51 (17), 4145–4158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae, Y.-S. Study on the Sorption Equilibrium and Kinetics of Seven Pure Gases on CMS. Yonsei University: Korea, 2001; M. Eng. Thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Bae, Y.-S.; Kim, K.-I.; Lee, C.-H. Comparison of Adsorption Equilibrium and Kinetics of Seven Pure Gases in a Carbon Molecular Sieve, Proceedings of Separation Technology, 2001, 2, 678–682.
   Google Scholar