Neural model of visual stereomatching: slant, transparency and clouds

References

• Anderson B L, Nakayama K. Toward a general theory of stereopsis: binocular matching, occluding contours, and fusion. Psychol. Rev. 1994; 101: 414–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop P O, Pettigrew J D. Neural mechanisms of binocular vision. Vision Res. 1986; 26: 1587–600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake R. A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychol. Rev. 1989; 96: 145–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake R, O'Shea R P. Abnormal fusion’ of stereopsis and binocular rivalry. Psychol. Rev. 1988; 95: 151–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley D C, Andersen R A. Stereospecificity of the nonclassical receptive field surround in macaque area MT. Investigative Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 1995; 36: S873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bregman A S. Auditory Scene Analysis: the Perceptual Organization of Sound. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1990
   Google Scholar
• DeAngelis G C, Ohzawa I, Freeman R D. Depth is encoded in the visual cortex by a specialized receptive field structure. Nature 1991; 352: 156–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferster D L. A comparison of binocular depth mechanisms in areas 17 and 18 of the cat visual cortex. J. Physiol. 1981; 311: 623–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox R, Aslin R N, Shea S L, Dumais S T. Stereopsis in human infants. Science 1980; 207: 323–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisby J P, Pollard S B. Computational issues in solving the stereo correspondence problem. Computational Models of Visual Processing, M S Landy, J A Movshon. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1991; 331–58
   Google Scholar
• Grossberg S. Neural expectation:cerebellar and retinal analogs of cells fired by learnable or unlearnable pattern classes. Kybernetik 1972; 10: 49–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossberg S. On the development of feature detectors in the visual cortex with applications to learning and reaction-diffusion systems. Biol. Cybern. 1976a; 21: 145–59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossberg S. Adaptive pattern classification and universal recoding: I. Parallel development and coding of neural feature detectors. Biol. Cybern. 1976b; 23: 121–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossberg S. Studies of Mind and Brain: Neural Principles of Learning, Perception, Development, Cognition, and Motor Control. Reidel Press, Boston, MA 1982
   Google Scholar
• Gupta V S, Marshall J A. Development of triadic neural circuits for anticipatory receptive field shifts under intended eye movements. Investigative Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 1995; 36: S378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Z J, Nakayama K. Perceived surface shape not features determines correspondence strength in apparent motion. Vision Res. 1994; 34: 2125–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch J, Gilbert C D. Synaptic physiology of horizontal connections in the cat's visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 1991; 11: 1800–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopfield J J. Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computation abilities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 1982; 79: 2554–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard R S, Marshall J A. Self-organizing neural network model of the visual inertia phenomenon in motion perception. Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 1994; 26, Technical Report 94-001
   Google Scholar
• Hubel D H, Wiesel T N. Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 1977; 198: 1–59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubel D H, Wiesel T N. Self-Organization and Associative Memory. Springer, New York 1984
   Google Scholar
• Julesz B. Foundations of Cyclopean Perception. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL 1971
   Google Scholar
• Krol J D, van de Grind W A. The double-nail illusion: experiments on binocular vision with nails, needles, and pins. Perception 1980; 9: 651–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee C W, Olshausen B A. A nonlinear Hebbian network that learns to detect disparity in random-dot stereograms. Neural Comput. 1996; 8: 545–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehky S R, Sejnowski T J. Neural model of stereoacuity and depth interpolation based on a distributed representation of stereo disparity. J. Neurosci. 1990; 10: 2281–99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marr D, Poggio T. Cooperative computation of stereo disparity. Science 1976; 194: 283–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall J A. Self-organizing neural network architectures for computing visual depth from motion parallax. Proc. Int. Joint Conf. on Neural Networks, Washington, DC. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ 1989; II: 227–34
   Google Scholar
• Marshall J A. Self-organizing neural networks for perception of visual motion. Neural Networks 1990a; 3: 45–74
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall J A. Development of length-selectivity in hypercomplex-type cells. Investigative Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 1990b; 31: S397
   Google Scholar
• Marshall J A. A self-organizing neural network for computing stereo disparity and transparency. Technical Digest, Opt. Soc. Am. Annual Meeting p 1990c; 268
   Google Scholar
• Marshall J A. Adaptive neural methods for multiplexing oriented edges. Intelligent Robots and Computer Vision IX: Neural, Biological, and 3-D Methods, Boston, MA. D P Casasent. 1990d; 1382: 282–91, Proc. SPIE
   Google Scholar
• Marshall J A. Unsupervised learning of contextual constraints in neural networks for simultaneous visual processing of multiple objects. Neural and Stochastic Methods in Image and Signal Processing, San Diego, CA. S S Chen. 1992; 1766: 84–93, Proc. SPIE
   Google Scholar
• Marshall J A. Adaptive perceptual pattern recognition by self-organizing neural networks: context, uncertainty, multiplicity, and scale. Neural Networks 1995a; 8: 335–62
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall J A. Motion perception: self-organization. The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks, M Arbib. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1995b; 153–7
   Google Scholar
• Marshall J A, Alley R K. A self-organizing neural network that learns to detect and represent visual depth from occlusion events. Proc. AAAI Fall Symp. on Machine Learning and Computer Vision, K Bowyer, L Hall. 1993; 70–4
   Google Scholar
• Marshall J A, Kalarickal G J. A neural circuit for stereomatching of transparent and oblique surfaces. Investigative Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 1995; 36: S366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama K, Shimojo S. Experiencing and perceiving visual surfaces. Science 1992; 257: 1357–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama K, Shimojo S, Silverman G H. Stereoscopic depth: its relation to image segmentation, grouping, and the recognition of occluded objects. Perception 1989; 18: 55–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohzawa I, DeAngelis G C, Freeman R D. Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors. Science 1990; 249: 1037–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poggio G F, Fischer B. Binocular interaction and depth sensitivity in striate and prestriate cortex of behaving rhesus monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 1977; 40: 1392–405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard S B, Frisby J P. Transparency and the uniqueness constraint in human and computer stereo vision. Nature 1990; 347: 553–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prazdny K. Detection of binocular disparities. Biol. Cybern. 1985; 52: 93–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian N, Sejnowski T J. Learning to solve random-dot stereograms of dense and transparent surfaces with recurrent backpropagation. Proc. 1988 Connectionist Models Summer School, D Touretzky, et al. Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo, CA 1989; 435–43
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt C P, Marshall J A. Development of a neural circuit for motion grouping and disambiguation. Investigative Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 1995; 36: S377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimojo S, Nakayama K. Real world occlusion constraints and binocular rivalry. Vision Res. 1990; 30: 69–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimojo S, Nakayama K. Interocularly unpaired zones escape local binocular matching. Vision Res. 1994; 34: 1875–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimojo S, Silverman G H, Nakayama K. Occlusion and the solution to the aperture problem for motion. Vision Res. 1989; 29: 619–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ternus J. Experimentelle Untersuchungen über phänomenale Identität. Psycholog. Forschung 1926; 7: 81–136
   Google Scholar
• van Ee R, Erkelens C J. Binocular perception of slant about oblique axes relative to a visual frame of reference. Perception 1995; 24: 299–314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinshall D. Perception of multiple transparent planes in stereo vision. Nature 1989; 341: 737–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westheimer G. The Ferrier lecture, 1992. Seeing depth with two eyes: stereopsis. Proc. R. Soc. London B 1994; 257: 205–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe J M. Stereopsis and binocular rivalry. Psychol. Review 1986; 93: 269–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe J M. Parallel ideas about stereopsis and binocular rivalry: a reply to Blake and O'Shea. Psychol. Rev. 1988; 95: 155–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar