A Comprehensive Revaluation of Small-Scale Congress Mash Protocol Parameters for Determining Extract and Fermentability

References

• American Society of Brewing Chemists. Methods of Analysis. The Society, St. Paul, MN, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Arakawa, T., and Timasheff, S. N. Stabilization of protein structure by sugars. Biochemistry 21:6536–6544, 1982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Back, J. F., Oakenfull, D., and Smith, M. B. Increased thermal stability of proteins in the presence of sugars and polyols. Biochemistry 18:5191–5196, 1979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradford, M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitization of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Ann. Biochem. 72:248–254, 1976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, D. E., Boulton, C. A., Brookes, P. A., and Stevens, R. Brewing: Science and Practice. CRC Press, New York, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Edney, M. J., Eglinton, J. K., Collins, H. M., and Barr, A. R. Biochemical and genetic basis of wort fermentability. In: Proc. Int. Barley Genet. Symp. Pp. 418–424, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Eglinton, J. K., Langridge, P., and Evans, D. E. Thermostability variation in alleles of barley beta-amylase. J. Cereal Sci. 28:301–309, 1998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Brewery Convention. Analytica–EBC. Fachverlag Hans Carl, Nürnberg, Germany, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D. E. A more cost- and labor-efficient assay for the combined measurement of the diastatic power enzymes β-amylase, α-amylase and limit dextrinase. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 66:215–222, 2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, D. E., Collins, H. M., Eglinton, J. K., and Wilhelmson, A. Assessing the impact of the level of diastatic power enzymes and their thermostability on the hydrolysis of starch during wort production to predict malt fermentability. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 63:185–198, 2005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, D. E., Dambergs, R., Ratkowsky, D., Li, C., Harasymow, S., Roumeliotis, S., and Eglinton, J. K. Refining the prediction of potential malt fermentability by including an assessment of limit dextrinase thermostability and additional measures of malt modification, using two different methods for multivariate model development. J. Inst. Brew. 116:86–97, 2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, D. E., and Hamet, M. A. G. The selection of a dried yeast strain for use in the apparent attenuation limit malt analysis (AAL) procedure. J. Inst. Brew. 111:209–214, 2005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, D. E., Li, C., and Eglinton, J. K. A superior prediction of malt attenuation. (CD) Proc. Congr. Eur. Brew. Conv. 31: Abstr. 4, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D. E., Li, C., and Eglinton, J. K. Improved prediction of malt fermentability by the measurement of the diastatic power enzymes β-amylase, α-amylase, and limit dextrinase. I. Survey of the levels of diastatic power enzymes in commercial malts. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 66:223–232, 2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, D. E., Li, C., and Eglinton, J. K. The properties and genetics of barley malt starch degrading enzymes. In: Genetics and Improvement of Barley Malting Quality. G. Zhang and C. Li, eds. Springer Verlag, New York. Pp. 143–189, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D. E., Robinson, L. H., Sheehan, M. C., Tolhurst, R. L., Skerritt, J. S., Hill, A., and Barr, A. R. Application of immunological methods to differentiate between foam-positive and haze-active proteins originating from malt. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 61:55–62, 2003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, D. E., Surrel, A., Sheehy, M., Stewart, D., and Robinson, L. H. Comparison of foam quality and the influence of hop a-acids and proteins by five foam analysis methods. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 65:1–10, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, M. R. Malt attenuation—An Australian brewer's perspective. In: Proc. 13th Aust. Barley Tech. Symp. Published online at http://proceedings.com.au/abts2007/, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Henson, C. A., and Duke, S. H. A comparison of standard and nonstandard measures of malt quality. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 66:11–19, 2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IoB. Methods of Analysis. Institute of Brewing, London, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, B. L. Endoproteinases of barley and malt. J. Cereal Sci. 42:139–156, 2005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhbeck, F., Back, W., and Krottenthaler, M. Influence of lauter turbidity on wort composition, fermentation, performance and beer quality in large-scale trials. J. Inst. Brew. 112:222–231, 2006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhbeck, F., Back, W., and Krottenthaler, M., Influence of lauter turbidity on composition, fermentation performance and beer quality—A review. J. Inst. Brew. 112:215–221, 2006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunze, W. Wort production. In: Technology of Brewing and Malting. T. Wainwright, ed. VLB, Berlin. Pp. 171–316, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Martens, H., and Naes, T. Multivariate Calibration. John Wiley, New York, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Moll, M., and Flayeux, R. New mashing system for determination of laboratory extract. J. Inst. Brew. 87:345–348, 1981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll, M., and Flayeux, R. Comparison of different malt analyses. J. Inst. Brew. 92:572–583, 1986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll, M., Flayeux, R., Lipus, G., and Marc, A. Biochemistry of mashing. Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. 18:166–173, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Moll, M., Flayeux, R., Schmitt, P., and Martin, D. Malzanalysis nach der TEPRAL-Method. Brauwissenschaft 30:149–151, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Moll, M., Lenoel, M., Flayeux, R., Laperche, S., Leclerc, D., and Baluais, G. The new TEPRAL method for malt extract determination. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 47:14–18, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Moonen, J. H. E., Graveland, A., and Muts, G. C. J. The molecular structure of gel protein from barley, its behavior in wort-filtration and analysis. J. Inst. Brew. 93:125–130, 1987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muts, G. C. J., Kakebeeke, P. L., and van den Berg, R. Malt characteristics and filtration. Proc. 18th Conv. Inst. Brew. (Aust. N.Z. Sect.), Adelaide. Institute of Brewing, London. Pp. 115–120, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Poyri, S., Mikola, M., Sontag-Strhom, T., Kaukovirta-Norja, A., and Home, S. The formation and hydrolysis of barley malt gel-protein under different mashing conditions. J. Inst. Brew. 108:261–267, 2002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, P. B., Li, Y., Barr, J., and Horsley, R. D. Effect of operational parameters on the determination of laboratory extract and associated wort quality factors. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 65:219–228, 2007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenholm, K., Home, S., Pietila, K., Jaakkola, N., and Leino, E. Are the days of congress mashing over? In: Proc. Barley Malt Wort Symp. Inst. Brew. (Cent. South. Afr. Sect.), Zimbabwe. Institute of Brewing, London. Pp. 149–163, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, G. G., Yonesawa, T., and Martin, S. A. Influence of mashing conditions on fermentation characteristics of all-malt wort used to produce beer or whiskey. Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. 44:256–263, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• van den Berg, R., Muts, G. C. J., Drost, B. W., and Graveland, A. Proteins from barley to wort. Proc. Congr. Eur. Brew. Conv. 18:461–469, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Wainwright, T. Effect of barley and malt lipid on beer properties. In: EBC Monograph 6. Pp. 118–128, 1980.
   Google Scholar