Effect of Vessel Wettability on the Foamability of “Ideal” Surfactants and “Real-World” Beer Heads

Literature Cited

• Bamforth, C. W., and Evans, D. E. Beer foam: Achieving a suitable head. In: Beer: A Quality Perspective. C. W. Bamforth, I. Russell, and G. Stewart, eds. Academic Press, Burlington, MA, pp. 1–60, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Beaumont, F., Popa, C., Liger-Belair, G., and Polidori, G. Temperature dependence of ascending bubble-driven flow patterns found in Champagne glasses as determined through numerical modeling. Adv. Mech. Eng. 2013:156430, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Beneventi, D., Carre, B., and Gandini, A. Role of surfactant structure on surface and foaming properties. Colloids Surf. A 189:65–73, 2001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheah, O., and Cilliers, J. J. Foaming behaviour of aerosol OT solutions at low concentrations using a continuous plunging jet method. Colloids Surf. A 263:347–352, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D. E., Sheehan, M. C., and Stewart, D. C. The impact of malt derived proteins on beer foam quality. Part II: The influence of malt foam-positive proteins and non-starch polysaccharides on beer foam quality. J. Inst. Brew. 105:171–177, 1999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, D. E., Oberdieck, M., Redd, K. S., and Newman, R. Comparison of the Rudin and NIBEM methods for measuring foam stability with a manual pour method to identify beer characteristics that deliver consumers stable beer foam. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 70:70–78, 2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folmer, B. M., and Holmberg, K. The cross-sectional headgroup area of nonionic surfactants: The influence of polydispersity. Colloids Surf. A 180:187–191, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Hamlett, C. A. E., Critchley, K., Gorzny, M., Evans, S. D., Prewett, P. D., and Preece, J. A. Vapour phase formation of amino functionalised Si3N4 surfaces. Surf. Sci. 602:2724–2733, 2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamlett, C. A. E., Shirtcliffe, N. J., McHale, G., Ahn, S., Bryant, R., Doerr, S. H., and Newton, M. I. Effect of particle size on droplet infiltration into hydrophobic porous media as a model of water repellent soil. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45:9666–9670, 2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamlett, C. A. E., Atherton, S., Shirtcliffe, N. J., McHale, G., Ahn, S., Bryant, R., Doerr, S. H., and Newton, M. I. Transitions of waterdrop impact behaviour on hydrophobic and hydrophilic particles. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 64:324–333, 2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. B., Drummond, C. J., Scales, P. J., and Nishimura, S. Comparison of techniques for measuring the electrical double layer properties of surfaces in aqueous solution: Hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide self-assembly structures as a model system, Langmuir 11:2367–2375, 1995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A. M. Fire Protection Systems. Delmar, Clifton Park, NY, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Kapp, G. R., and Bamforth, C. W. The foaming properties of proteins isolated from barley. J. Sci. Food. Agric. 82:1276–1281, 2002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liger-Belair, G., Polidori, G., and Jeandet, P. Recent advances in the science of champagne bubbles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 37:2490–2511, 2008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papara, M., Zabulis, X., and Karapantsios, T. D. Container effects on the free drainage of wet foams. Chem. Eng. Sci. 64:1404–1415, 2009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parish, M. New research proves effectiveness of “Head Keeper” nucleated glassware. Brew. Dig. 71:26–27, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Petkova, R., Tcholakova, S., and Denkov, N. D. Foaming and foam stability for mixed polymer-surfactant solutions: Effects of surfactant type and polymer charge. Langmuir 28:4996–5009, 2012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugh, R. J. Foaming, foam films, antifoaming and defoaming. Adv. Surf. Colloid Sci. 64:67–142, 1996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronteltap, A. O., Hollemans, M., Bisperink, C. G. J., and Prins, A. Beer foam physics. Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. 28:25–32, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J., and Miles, G. D. An apparatus for comparison of foaming properties of soaps and detergents. Oil Soap 18:99–102, 1941.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, W. L., and Hemmingsen, E. A. Bubble formation in water at smooth hydrophobic surfaces. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 157:312–317, 1993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seddon, J. R. T., Kooij, E. S., Poelsema, B., Zandvliet, H. J. W., and Lohse, D. Surface bubble nucleation stability. Phys. Rev. Letts. 106:056101–056104, 2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharpe, F. R. Collaborative determination of beer foam stability by Rudin and NIBEM. J. Inst. Brew. 103:277–278, 1997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, J., Chen, H., Brownawell, B. J., and Westall, J. C. Use of cationic surfactants to modify soil surfaces to promote sorption and retard migration of hydrophobic organic compounds. Environ. Sci. Technol. 28:231–237, 1994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaire, D., and Hutzler, S. The Physics of Foams. Clarendon Press, Oxford/New York, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Zana, R., Kaplun, A., and Talmon, Y. Microstructural aspects of polysoap/sodium dodecyl sulfate interactions. Langmuir 9:1948–1950, 1993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuidberg, A. F. Physics of foam formation on a solid surface in carbonated liquid. Ph.D. thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, the Netherlands, 1997.
   Google Scholar