262
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Impact of Serial Repitching on Lager Brewing Yeast Quality

Impacto de Refloculaciones Sucesivas en la Calidad de Levadura Cervecera Lager

, , , &
Pages 1-9 | Received 07 Jun 2002, Accepted 23 Jun 2002, Published online: 01 Feb 2018

Literature Cited

  • Alexandre, H., Rousseaux, I., and Charpentier, C. Ethanol adaptation mechanisms in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 20:173–183, 1994.
  • American Society of Brewing Chemists. Report of Subcommittee on Differentiation of Ale and Lager Yeast. Journal 52:184–186, 1994.
  • Attfield, P. V. Trehalose accumulates in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during exposure to agents that induce heat shock response. FEBS (Fed. Eur. Biochem. Soc.) Lett. 225:259–263, 1987.
  • Axcell, B., and O'Connor-Cox, E. The concept of yeast vitality—An alternative approach. Proc. Conv. Inst. Brew. Asia Pacific Sect. 64, 1996.
  • Bendiak, D. Review of metabolic activity tests and their ability to predict fermentation performance. In: Brewing Yeast Fermentation Performance. K. A. Smart, Ed. Blackwell Scientific Publishers, Oxford, U.K., Chapter 5, pp. 34–44, 2000.
  • Boulton, C. Applications of yeast physiology for improvements in the brewing process. J. Chem. Tech. Biochem. 50:135–137, 1991.
  • Boulton, C. Trehalose, glycogen and sterol. In: Brewing Yeast Fermentation Performance. K. A. Smart, Ed. Blackwell Scientific Publishers, Oxford, U.K., Chapter 2, pp. 10–18, 2000.
  • Boulton, C., Clutterbuck, V. J., and Durnin, S. Yeast oxygenation and storage. In: Brewing Yeast Fermentation Performance. K. A. Smart, Ed. Blackwell Scientific Publishers, Oxford, U.K., Chapter 20, pp. 140–151, 2000.
  • Brown, S. W. Ethanol inhibition of yeast growth and fermentation: Differences in the magnitude and complexity of the effect. Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 11:151–155, 1981.
  • Callaerts, G., Iserentant, D., and Verachtert, H. Relationship between trehalose and sterol accumulation during oxygenation of cropped yeast. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 51:75–77, 1993.
  • Cunningham, S. Comparison of yeast growth profiles of fermentations pitched on the basis of off line capacitance with those pitched using traditional methods. In: Brewing Yeast Fermentation Performance. K. A. Smart, Ed. Blackwell Scientific Publishers, Oxford, U.K., Chapter 8, pp. 67–73, 2000.
  • Eleutheiro, E. C. A., Araujo, P. S., and Panek, A. D. Role of trehalose carrier in dehydration resistance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Gen. Microbiol. 137:637–644, 1993.
  • Hayflick, L. The limited in vitro lifetime of human diploid cell strains. Exp. Cell Res. 37:614–636, 1968.
  • Hottinger, T., Boller, T., and Wiemken, A. Correlation of trehalose content and heat resistance in yeast mutants altered in the RAS1 adenylate cyclase pathway: Is trehalose a thermoprotectant? FEBS (Fed. Eur. Biochem. Soc.) Lett. 225:431–434, 1994.
  • Imai, T., Nakajima, I., and Ohno, T. Development of a new method for evaluation of yeast vitality by measuring intracellular pH. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 52:5–8, 1994.
  • Iwahashi, H., Obuchi, K., Fuiji, S., and Komatsu, Y. The correlative evidence suggesting that trehalose stabilises membrane structures in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell. Mol. Biol. 41:763–769, 1995.
  • Jenkins, C. L., Kennedy, A. I., Hodgson, J. A., Thurston, P. A., and Smart, K. A. Serial repitching, functional biomarkers and fermentation performance. In: Proc. Brewing Yeast Fermentation Performance Congr., 3rd. K. A. Smart, Ed. Blackwell Scientific Publishers, Oxford, U.K., Chapter 24, pp. 257–271, 2003.
  • Jones, H. Propagation—Past, present and future. Brew. Guardian 128(10):24–27, 1997.
  • Kara, B. Prediction of the fermentation performance of brewing yeast with the acidification power test. J. Inst. Brew. 94:153–158, 1988.
  • Knudsen, F. B. Fermentation variables and their control. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 43:91–95, 1985.
  • Kunze, G., Kunze, I., Barner, A., and Schulz, R. Genetical and biochemical classification of Saccharomyces industrial strains. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 346:868–871, 1993.
  • Kunze, G., Kunze, I., Barner, A., and Schulz, R. Classification of Saccharomyces strains by genetical and biochemical methods. Monatsschr. Brauwiss. 46:132–137, 1993.
  • Lentini, A. A review of the various methods available for monitoring the physiological status of the yeast: Yeast viability and vitality. Ferment 6:321–327, 1993.
  • Lillie, S. H., and Pringle, J. H. Reserve carbohydrate metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Responses to nutrient limitation. J. Bacteriol. 143:1384–1394, 1980.
  • Lloyd, D., and Dinsdale, G. From brightfield to fluorescence and confocal microscopy. In: Brewing Yeast Fermentation Performance. K. A. Smart, Ed. Blackwell Scientific Publishers, Oxford, U.K., Chapter 1, pp. 3–9, 2000.
  • Lydall, D., and Weinert, T. From DNA damage to cell cycle arrest and suicide: A budding yeast perspective. Curr. Opin. Genet. 6(1):4–11, 1996.
  • Mackenzie, K. F., Singh, K. K., and Brown, A. D. Water stress sensitivity plating hypersensitivity of yeasts: Protective role of trehalose in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Gen. Microbiol. 134:1661–1666, 1988.
  • Mager, W. H., and De Kruijff, A. J. J. Stress induced transcriptional activation. Microbiol. Rev. 59:506–531, 1995.
  • Majara, M., O'Connor-Cox, E. S. C., and Axcell, B. C. Trehalose—A stress protectant and stress indicator compound for yeast exposed to adverse conditions. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 54:221–227, 1996.
  • Mansure, J. J. C., Panek, A. D., Crowe, L. M., and Crowe, J. H. Trehalose inhibits ethanol effects on intact yeast cells and liposomes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1191:309–316, 1994.
  • Martin, V., Quain, D. E., and Smart, K. A. Oxidative stress response of ale and lager yeast strains. Proc. Congr. Eur. Brew. Conv. 26:679–686, 1999.
  • Martin, V., Quain, D., and Smart, K. A. Oxidative stress response of ale and lager yeast strains. In: Brewing Yeast Fermentation Performance. K. A. Smart, Ed. Blackwells Scientific Publishers, Oxford, U.K., Chapter 13, pp. 97–104, 2000.
  • Mathieu, C., Van der Berg, L., and Iserentant, D. Prediction of yeast fermentation performance using the acidification power test. Proc. Congr. Eur. Brew. Conv. 23:273–278, 1991.
  • McCaig, R. Evaluation of the fluorescent dye 1-anilino-8-napthalene sulfonic acid for yeast viability determination. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 48:22–25, 1990.
  • McCaig, R., and Bendiak, D. S. Yeast handling studies I. Agitation of stored pitching yeast. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 43:114–118, 1985.
  • Mochaba, F. M., O'Connor-Cox, E. S. C., and Axcell, B. C. A novel and practical yeast vitality method based on magnesium ion release. J. Inst. Brew. 103:99–102, 1997.
  • Monch, D., Kruger, E., and Stahl, U. Effect of stress on brewery yeast. Monatsschr. Brauwiss. 48:288–299, 1995.
  • O'Connor-Cox, E. The use of glycogen and trehalose contents as indicators for process optimisation. Ferment 7:321–328, 1996.
  • O'Connor-Cox, E. Improving yeast handling in the brewery. Part 1. Yeast cropping. Brew. Guardian 126(12):26–34, 1997.
  • O'Connor-Cox, E. Improving yeast handling in the brewery. Part 2. Yeast collection. Brew. Guardian 127(2):22–33, 1998.
  • Oliver, S. G. From DNA sequence to biological function. Nature 379:597–600, 1996.
  • Operkarova, M., and Sigler, K. Acidification power: Indicator of metabolic activity and autolytic changes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Folia Microbiol. 27:395–403, 1982.
  • Panchal, C. J., and Stewart, G. G. The effect of osmotic pressure on the production and excretion of ethanol and glycerol in brewing yeast strains. J. Inst. Brew. 86:207–210, 1980.
  • Pierce, J. Institute of Brewing Analysis Committee: Measurement of yeast viability. J. Inst. Brew. 76:442–443, 1970.
  • Powell, C., Van Zandycke, S., Quain, D. E., and Smart, K. A. Replicative ageing and senescence in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the impact on brewing fermentations. Microbiology 146:1023–1034, 2000.
  • Rhymes, M. R., and Smart, K. A. Effect of starvation on the flocculation of ale and lager brewing yeast. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 54:50–56, 1996.
  • Rose, A. H. Composition of the envelope layers of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in relation to flocculation and ethanol tolerance. J. Appl. Bacteriol. Symp. Suppl. 74:110S–118S, 1993.
  • Sami, M., Ikeda, M., and Yabuuchi, S. Evaluation of the alkaline blue staining method for yeast activity determination. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 78:212–216, 1994.
  • Siddique, R., and Smart, K. A. Predicting fermentation performance using proton efflux. In: Brewing Yeast Fermentation Performance. K. A. Smart, Ed. Blackwell Scientific Publishers, Oxford, U.K., Chapter 6, pp. 46–53, 2000.
  • Smart, K. A. Ageing in brewing yeast. Brew. Guardian 128(2):19–24, 1999.
  • Smart, K. A. The death of the yeast cell. In: Brewing Yeast Fermentation Performance. K. A. Smart, Ed. Blackwell Scientific Publishers, Oxford, U.K., Chapter 14, pp. 105–113, 2000.
  • Smart, K. A. Biomarkers of yeast condition—Predicting fitness to ferment. Proc. Conv. Inst. Guild Brew. Africa Sect. 8:138–149, 2001.
  • Smart, K. A. The management of brewing yeast stress. Proc. Congr. Eur. Brew. Conv. 21:306–315, 2001.
  • Smart, K. A. Viability, vitality and stress. Proc. Conv. Inst. Guild Brew. Africa Sect. 9: In press.
  • Smart, K. A., and Whisker, S. W. Effect of serial repitching on fermentation properties and condition of brewing yeast. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 54:41–44, 1996.
  • Smart, K. A., Boulton, C. A., Hinchliffe, E., and Molzahn, S. Effect of physiological stress on the surface properties of brewing yeast. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 53:33–38, 1995.
  • Smart, K. A., Chamber, K. M., Lambert, I., Jenkins, C., and Smart, C. A. Use of methylene violet staining procedures to determine yeast viability and vitality. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 57:18–23, 1999.
  • Stafford, R. A., Stoupis, T., and Stewart, G. The response of brewers' yeast to a defined shear field for differing exposure times. Proc. Congr. Eur. Brew. Conv. 21:323–326, 2001.
  • Van Uden, N., Leao, C., Sa-Correia, I., and Loureiro, V. Effects of ethanol on yeast performance: Targets and underlying mechanisms. Proc. Congr. Eur. Brew. Conv. 19:137–144, 1983.
  • Van Zandycke, S. M., Simal, O., Gualdoni, S., and Smart, K. A. Yeast quality and fluorophore technologies. In: Proc. Brewing Yeast Fermentation Performance Congr., 3rd. K. A. Smart, Ed. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, U.K., Chapter 14, pp. 149–161, 2003.
  • Van Zandycke, S., Siddique, R., and Smart, K. A. The role of the membrane in predicting yeast quality. Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. In press.
  • Walker, G. Yeast Physiology and Biotechnology. John Wiley, Chichester, England, U.K., 1998.
  • Walmsey, R. M. DNA fingerprinting of yeast. Ferment 7:231–234, 1994.
  • White, P., Kennedy, A. I., Hodgson, J. A., Thurston, P. A., and Smart, K. A. The osmotic stress response of ale and lager brewing yeast strains. In: Proc. Brewing Yeast Fermentation Performance Cong., 3rd. K. A. Smart, Ed. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, U.K., Chapter 5, pp. 46–60, 2003.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.