Deconstructing Differences in African-American and European-American Adolescents’ Perspectives on U.S. History

References

• Almaguer, T. 1994. Racial fault lines: A history of white supremacy in California. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asante, M. K. 1991. The Afrocentric idea in education. Journal of Negro Education 60: 170–180.
   Google Scholar
• California Department of Education. 1987. History-social science framework. Sacramento: Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, E. H. 1961. What is history? London: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cronon, W. 1992. A place for stories: Nature, history, and narrative. Journal of American History 78: 1347–1376.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, T. L. 1993. Multiculturalism and the politics of history. Teachers College Record 95: 273–282.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, T. L. In review. Urban adolescents’ perspectives on nation and race in
   Google Scholar
• United States history: Moving beyond the method of multiple perspectives.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, R. 1989. Teacher conceptions of history. Theory and Research in Social Education 17: 210–240.
   Google Scholar
• Foner, E. 1994. The meaning of freedom in the age of emancipation. Journal of American History 81: 435–460.
   Google Scholar
• Gates, H. L. Jr. 1988. The signifying monkey: A theory of African American literary criticism. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gates, H. L. Jr. 1994. Colored people: A memoir. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Gilroy, P. 1987. “There ain’t no black in the Union Jack”: The cultural politics of race and nation. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Gwaltney, J. 1993. Drylongso: A self-portrait of black America. New York: New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. 1984. State and society in contemporary Britain: A critical introduction. New York: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, T. 1990. Thinking historically: Narrative, imagination, and understanding. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, T. 1995. Marking: Race, race-making, and the writing of history. American Historical Review 100: 100–120.
   Google Scholar
• Ignatiev, N. 1995. How the Irish became white. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G., and W. F. Tate. 1995. Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record 97: 47–68.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, L. 1996. Immigrant acts: On Asian American cultural politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for History in the Schools. 1994. National standards for United States history: Exploring the American experience. Los Angeles: National Center for History in the Schools.
   Google Scholar
• New York Social Studies Review and Development Committee. 1991. One nation, many peoples: A declaration of cultural interdependence. Albany: Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Omi, M., and H. Winant. 1994. Racial formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. 1990. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ravitch, D. 1990, Summer. Multiculturalism: E pluribus plures. American Scholar, 337–354.
   Google Scholar
• Roediger, D. 1991. The wages of whiteness: Race and the making of the American working class. London: Verso Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlesinger, A. 1992. The disuniting of America. New York: Norton, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. 1987. Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Terkel, S. 1992. Race: How blacks and whites think and feel about the American obsession. New York: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, P. A. 1993. I heard it through the grapevine: Rumor in African American culture. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Sledright, B., and J. Brophy. 1992. Storytelling, imagination, and fanciful elaboration in children’s historical reconstructions. American Educational Research Journal 29: 837–859.
   Google Scholar