Curriculum Materials in Mathematics Education Reform: A Framework for Examining Teachers’ Curriculum Development

References

• Ball, D. L. 1994. Developing mathematics reform: What don’t we know about teacher learning—but would make good hypotheses? Paper prepared for the conference on Teacher Enhancement in Mathematics K–6, National Science Foundation, Washington D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Peretz, M. 1990. The teacher-curriculum encounter: Freeing teachers from the tyranny of texts. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C. A., Smith, S., and Stein, M. K. 1996. Linking teacher professional development to enhanced classroom instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, W. S. 1986. Preservice teachers’ sources of decisions in teaching secondary mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 17(1): 21–30.
   Google Scholar
• Clandinin, D. J., and Connelly, F. M. 1992. Teacher as curriculum maker. In Handbook of research on curriculum, ed. P. W. Jackson, 369–401. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. K. 1989. Teaching practice: Plus ça change… . In Contributing to educational change: Perspectives on research and practice, ed. P.W. Jackson, 27–84. Berkeley: McCutchan.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. K., and Barnes, C. 1993. Pedagogy and policy. In Teaching for understanding: Challenges for practice, research, and policy, eds. D. K. Cohen, M. W. McLaughlin, and J. E. Talbert, 207–239. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., and Pearson, P. D. 1991. Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research 61: 239–264.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, B. F. 1983. Power and curriculum in implementation: A case study of an innovative mathematics program. Ph.D. diss., University of Wisconsin, Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, W. 1993. Constructing curriculum in the classroom. In Effective and responsible teaching, eds. F. K. Oser, A. Dick, and J. Patry, 66–79. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., and Putnam, J. 1987. Putting the teacher in control: Basal reading textbooks and instructional decision making. Elementary School Journal 87: 357–366.
   Google Scholar
• Durkin, D. 1983. Is there a match between what elementary teachers do and what basal manuals recommend? Tech. Rep. No. 44. Urbana, IL: Center for the Study of Reading.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, L. B. 1995. Navigating a sea of ideas: Teacher and students negotiate a course toward mutual relevance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 32(10): 1065–1083.
   Google Scholar
• Floden, R. E., Porter, A. C., Schmidt, W. H., Freeman, D. J., and Schwille, J. R. 1981. Responses to curriculum pressures: A policy-capturing study of teacher decisions about content. Journal of Educational Psychology 73(2): 129–141.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, D., and Porter, A. 1989. Do textbooks dictate the content of mathematics instruction in elementary schools? American Educational Research Journal 26(3): 403–421.
   Google Scholar
• Gehrke, N. J., Knapp, M. S., and Sirotnik, K. A. 1992. In search of the school curriculum. In Review of research in education, ed. G. Grant, 51–110. Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Golden, J. M. 1988. The construction of a literary text in a story-reading lesson. In Multiple perspective analyses of classroom discourse, eds. J. L. Green, and J. O. Harker, 71–106. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Graybeal, S. S., and Stodolsky, S. S. 1987. Where’s all the “good stuff ?”: An analysis of fifth-grade mathematics and social studies teachers’ guides. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Heaton, R. M. 1994. Creating and studying a practice of teaching elementary mathematics for understanding. Ph.D. diss., Michigan State University, East Lansing.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, P. W. 1986. The practice of teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhs, T. M., and Freeman, D. J. 1979. The potential influence of textbooks on teachers’ selection of content for elementary school mathematics. Research Series No. 48. East Lansing, MI: Institute for Research on Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Lampert, M. 1990. When the problem is not the question and the answer is not the solution: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Education Research Journal 27(1): 29–64.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. 1990. Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Lytle, S. and Botel, M. 1988. Reading, writing, and talking across the curriculum. Harrisburg, PA: Pennsylvania Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lortie, D. C. 1975. School teacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 1989. The curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 1991. The professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., and Stephens, D. 1994. Learning about literacy: A 30-year journey. In Theoretical models and processes of reading, 4th ed., eds. R. B. Ruddell, M. R.
   Google Scholar
• Ruddell, and H. Singer, 22–42. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. T. 1992. Teaching the “hows” of mathematics for everyday life: A case of a fifth-grade teacher. Elementary School Journal 93(2): 163–177.
   Google Scholar
• Remillard, J. T. 1991. Abdicating authority for knowing: A teacher’s use of an innovative mathematics curriculum. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, Institute for Research on Teaching, Center for the Learning and Teaching of Elementary Subjects.
   Google Scholar
• Remillard, J. T. 1996. Changing texts, teachers, and teaching: The role of curriculum materials in a mathematics education reform. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, L. 1994. The transactional theory of reading and writing. In Theoretical models and processes of reading, 4th ed., eds. R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, and H.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, 1057–1092. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Sarason, S. 1982. The culture of the school and the problem of change. 2nd ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, J., Bolin, F., and Zumwalt, K. 1992. Curriculum implementation. In Handbook of research on curriculum, ed. P. W. Jackson, 402–435. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sosniak, L. A., and Stodolsky, S. S. 1993. Teachers and textbooks: Materials use in four fourth-grade classrooms. The Elementary School Journal 93(3): 249–275.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. R. 1978. Case study methods in educational research: Seeking sweet water. In Complementary methods for research in education, ed. R. M. Jaeger, 253–278. Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E., and Easley, J. 1978. Case studies in science education. Urbana: Center for Instructional Research and Curriculum Evaluation and Committee on Culture and Cognition, University of Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., and Henningsen, M. 1996. Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal 33(2): 455–488.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, W. M. 1982. Mathematical knowledge and school work: A case study of the teaching of developing mathematical processes. Ph.D. diss., University of Wisconsin, Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Stodolsky, S. 1989. Is teaching really by the book? In From Socrates to software: The teacher as text and the text as teacher, eds. P. Jackson, and S. Haroutunina-Gordon, 159–184. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, A. 1984. The relationship of teachers’ conceptions of mathematics and mathematics teaching to instructional practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics 15: 105–127.
   Google Scholar
• Tyson-Bernstein, H., andWoodward, A. 1991. Nineteenth century policies for twenty-first century practice: The textbook reform dilemma. In Textbooks in American society, eds. P. G. Altbach, G. P. Kelly, H. G. Petrie, and L. Weis, 91–104. New York: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, B. F. 1976. Curriculum evolution as portrayed through old textbooks. Terre Haute, IN: Indiana State University, School of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward A., and Elliot, D. L. 1990. Textbook use and teacher professionalism. In Textbooks and schooling in the United States, eds. D. Elliot, and A. Woodward, 178–193. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 1994. Case study research: Design and methods, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yinger, R. 1987. By the seat of your pants: An inquiry into improvisation and teaching. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Yinger, R. 1988. The conversation of teaching: Patterns of explanation in mathematics lessons. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Study Association on Teacher Thinking, Nottingham, England.
   Google Scholar