A Perspective on Achieving Equality in Mathematics for Fourth Grade Girls: A Special Case

References

• Ambrose, R., L. Levi, and E. Fennema. 1997. The complexities of teaching for gender equity. In Multicultural and gender equity in the mathematics classroom: The gift of diversity, eds. J. Trentacosta and M. Kenney (1997 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Yearbook) 236–42. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• American Association of University Women. 1992. How schools shortchange girls: A study of major findings on girls and education. Washington, DC: AAUW Educational Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• American Association of University Women. 1995. Growing smart: What’s working for girls in school.Washington, DC: AAUW Educational Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Belenky, M., B. Clinchy, N. Goldberger, and J. Tarule 1986. Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bellack, A. 1978. Competing ideologies in research on education. Uppsala, Sweden: Department of Education, Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Cazden, C. 1988. Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., K. McClain, and J. Whitenack. 1997. Reflective discourse and collective reflection. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 28 (3): 258–77.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., T. Wood, E. Yackel, and B. McNeal. 1992. Characteristics of classroom mathematics traditions: An interactional analysis. American Educational Research Journal 29 (3): 573–604.
   Google Scholar
• Delamont, S. 1976. Interaction in the classroom. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J., and P. Blumenfeld 1985. Classroom experiences and student gender: Are there differences and do they matter? In Gender influences in classroom interaction, eds. L. Wilkinson and C. Marrett, 79–114. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, P., and M. Kenney, eds. 1996. Communication in mathematics, K–12 and beyond. 1996 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Yearbook. Reston, VA: NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. 1986. Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In Handbook of research on teaching, 3d ed., ed. M. Wittrock, 119–61. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fennema, E. 1990. Justice, equity, and mathematics education. In Mathematics and gender, eds. E. Fennema and G. Leder, 1–9. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. 1983. Exploring classroom discourse: Linguistic perspectives on teachinglearning processes. Educational Psychologist 18 (3): 180–99.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, D. 1995. Discourse, learning, and teaching. In Review of research in education ed. M. W. Apple, 21: 49–95. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, D. 1998. Closing reflections on mathematical talk and mathematics teaching. In Talking mathematics in school, eds. M. Lampert and M. Blunk, 241–52. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hymes, D. 1972. Introduction. In Functions of language in the classroom, eds. C. Cazden, V. John, and D. Hymes, xi–lvii. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kliebard, H. 1982. Curriculum theory as metaphor. Theory Into Practice 21 (1): 11–17.
   Google Scholar
• Lampert, M. 1985. How do teachers manage to teach? Perspectives on problems in practice. Harvard Educational Review 55 (2): 178–94.
   Google Scholar
• Lampert, M., and M. Blunk, eds. 1998. Talking mathematics in school. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leder, G. 1987. Teacher student interaction: A case study. Educational Studies in Mathematics 18 (3): 255–71.
   Google Scholar
• Leder, G. 1990. Teacher/student interactions in the mathematics classroom: A different perspective. In Mathematics and gender, eds. E. Fennema and G. Leder, 149–68. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, J., G. Wheatley, and A. Smith. 1994. The participation, beliefs, and development of arithmetic meaning of a third-grade student in mathematics class discussions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 25 (1): 30–49.
   Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. 1979. Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. 1994. The role of discourse in learning, schooling, and reform. In Language and learning: Educating linguistically diverse students, ed. B. McLeod, 71–96. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. 1998. The study of social interaction in educational settings: Accomplishments and unresolved issues. Human Development 41 (4): 245–69.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 1991. Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Oakes, J. 1992. Can tracking research inform practice? Technical, normative, and political considerations. Educational Researcher 21 (4): 12–21.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, T. 1980. Wollygaggles and other creatures: Problems for developing thinking skills. White Plains, NY: Cuisenaire.
   Google Scholar
• Orenstein, P. 1994. Schoolgirls: Young women, self-esteem, and the confidence gap. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Page, R. 1991. Lower-track classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Page, R., and L. Valli, eds. 1990. Curriculum differentiation: Interpretive studies in U.S. secondary schools. New York: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R., M. Lampert, and P. Peterson. 1990. Alternative perspectives on knowing mathematics in elementary schools. In Review of research in education, ed. C. Casden, 16: 57–150.Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Romberg, T. 1992. Problematic features of the school mathematics curriculum. In Handbook of research on curriculum, ed. P. Jackson, 749–88. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sadker, M., and D. Sadker. 1994. Failing at fairness: How America’s schools cheat girls. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, E., and H. McCollum. 1993. Making it happen: Gender equitable classrooms. In Gender and education (Ninety-second Yearbook of the Society for the Study of Education), eds. S. Biklen and D. Pollard, 174–90. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, E. 1996. Moving beyond learning alone and in silence: Observations from the QUASAR project concerning communication in mathematics classrooms. In Innovations in learning: New environments for education, eds. L. Schauble and R. Glaser, 127–59. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Tannen, D. 1994. You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: Ballentine Books.
   Google Scholar
• Tarule, J. 1996. Voices in dialogue: Collaborative ways of knowing. In Knowledge, difference, and power: Essays inspired by women’s ways of knowing, eds. N. Goldberger, J. Tarule, B. Clinchy, and M. Belenky, 274–304. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Trentacosta, J., and M. Kenney, eds. 1997. Multicultural and gender equity in the mathematics classroom: The gift of diversity (1997 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Yearbook). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Valian, V. 1998. Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wehlage, G. 1981. The purpose of generalization in field-study research. In A study of schooling: Field-based methodologies in educational research and evaluation, eds. T. Popkewitz and R. Tabachnick, 211–26. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Yackel, E., and P. Cobb. 1996. Sociomathematical norms, argumentations, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 27 (4): 458–77.
   Google Scholar