Why ‘spiritism’?

References

• Bálint M (1955). Notes on parapsychology and parapsychological healing. Int J Psychoanal 36:31–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer E (1991). Periods of historical development of parapsychology in Germany – an overview. The Parapsychological Association 34th Annual Convention: Proceedings of presented papers, 18–34.
   Google Scholar
• Burlingham D (1935). Child analysis and the mother. Psychoanal Q 4:69–92.
   Google Scholar
• Brabant E, Falzeder E, Giampieri‐deutsch P, editors (1993). The correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Sándor Ferenczi. Vol. 1, 1908–1914. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
   Google Scholar
• Brabant E, Falzeder E, Giampieri‐deutsch P, editors (2000).The correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Sándor Ferenczi. Vol. 3, 1920–1933. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
   Google Scholar
• Chengery pap E (1938). Új látóhatárok felé [Towards new horizons]. Budapest: Magánkiadás.
   Google Scholar
• Chertok L, Stengers I (1992). A critique of psychoanalytic reason: Hypnosis as a scientific problem from Lavoisier to Lacan. Stanford, CA: Stanford UP.
   Google Scholar
• De sanctis S (1999 [1902]). A csodás elem az álomlátásokban [Miraculous element in dreaming]. In: Mészáros J, editor. Ferenczi Sándor. A pszichoanalízis felé [Towards psychoanalysis]. Budapest: Osiris, 357–65.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch H (1926). Occult processes occurring during psychoanalysis. Imago 12:418–33.
   Google Scholar
• Devereux G (1953). Psychoanalysis and the occult. London: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle AC (1926). The history of spiritualism. London: Cassel and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenwald J (1971). Mother‐child symbiosis: Cradle of ESP. Psychoanalytic Rev 58:455–66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eisenbud J (1970). Psi and psychoanalysis: Studies in the psychoanalysis of psi‐conditioned behavior. New York: Grune & Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Ellenberger HF (1970). The discovery of the unconscious: The history and the evolution of dynamic psychiatry. London: The Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evrard R, Massicotte C, Rabeyron T (n.d.). Psychoanalysts and the sour apple: Thought‐transference in historical and contemporary psychoanalysis (manuscript).
   Google Scholar
• Fényes L (1912). Egy somnambul halálára. Égi Világosság, September: 484–9.
   Google Scholar
• Ferenczi S (1899). Spiritism. Psychoanal Rev 1963(50A):139–44.
   Google Scholar
• Ferenczi S (1900a). Somnambulismus und Spiritismus (Leopold Löwenfeld könyvének ismertetése) [Somnambulism and spiritism (a review of the book of Leopold Löwenfeld)]. Gyógyásza 40(46):730.
   Google Scholar
• Ferenczi S (1900b). Tanulmányok a szellemtan köréből’ (spiritizmus) (Wajdits Lajos könyvének ismertetése) [Essays on the field of spiritualism (a review of the book of Lajos Wajdits)]. Gyógyászat 40(27):426.
   Google Scholar
• Ferenczi S (1909). Introjection and transference. In: Dupont J, editor. First contributions to psycho‐analysis. London: Karnac Books, 2002, 35–53.
   Google Scholar
• Ferenczi S (1913). Stages in the development of the sense of reality. In: Dupont J, editor. First contributions to psycho‐analysis. London: Karnac Books, 2002, 213–39.
   Google Scholar
• Ferenczi S (1915). Psychogenic anomalies of voice production. In: Rickman J, editor. Further contributions to the theory and technique of psycho‐analysis. London: Karnac Books, 1980, 233–5.
   Google Scholar
• Ferenczi S (1917). My friendship with Miksa Schachter. Brit J Psychother 1993, 9(4):430–3.
   Google Scholar
• Ferenczi S (1919a). The phenomena of hysterical materialization. In: Rickman J, editor. Further contributions to the theory and technique of psycho‐analysis. London: Karnac Books, 1926,89–104.
   Google Scholar
• Ferenczi S (1919b). An attempted explanation of some hysterical stigmata. In: Rickman J, editor. Further contributions to the theory and technique of psycho‐analysis. London: Karnac Books, 1926, 110–18.
   Google Scholar
• Ferenczi S (1928). The elasticity of psychoanalytic technique. In: Balint M, editor. Final contributions to the problems and method of psycho‐analysis. London: Karnac Books, 2002, 87–102.
   Google Scholar
• Ferenczi S (1929). The unwelcome child and his death instinct. In: Balint M, editor. Final contributions to the problems and method of psycho‐analysis. London: Karnac Books, 2002, 102–8.
   Google Scholar
• Ferenczi S (1930). The principle of relaxation and neocatharsis. Int J Psychoanal 11:428–43.
   Google Scholar
• Ferenczi S (1932a). The confusion of tongues between adults and children: The language of tenderness and passion. Int J Psychoanal 1949(30):225–30.
   Google Scholar
• Ferenczi S (1932b). The clinical diary of Sándor Ferenczi, 1995. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
   Google Scholar
• Flournoy T (1900). Des Indes à la planète Mars. Étude sur un cas de somnambulisme avec glossolalie [From India to the planet Mars: A study of somnambulism with glossolalia]. Paris: Librairie Félix Alcan.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor N (1936). A vizek szétválasztása [The divison of waters]. Metapsychikai Folyóirat 228–31.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor N (1947). Telepathy in analysis: a discussion of five dreams. Psychiatric Q 21(2):178–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor N (1959). The haunted mind: A psychoanalyst looks at the supernatural. New York: Garrett.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor N (1971). Freud, Jung and occultism. New York: University Books, New Hyde Park.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester J (1990). Psychoanalysis: Gossip, telepathy and/or science. The Seductions of Psychoanalysis: Freud, Lacan, and Derrida, 246–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1899). A premonitory dream fulfilled. SE 5:623–5.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1919). The uncanny. SE 17:219–52.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1921). Psychoanalysis and telepathy. SE 18:175–93.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1922). Dreams and telepathy. SE 18:197–220.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1927). The future of an illusion. SE 21:1–56.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1933). Dreams and occultism. SE 22:31–56.
   Google Scholar
• Galbreath R (1971). The history of modern occultism: A bibliographical survey. The Journal of Popular Culture 5(3):726–54.
   Google Scholar
• Granoff W, Rey JM (1983). L'occulte: objet de la pensée freudienne, 2005. Paris: PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwell TW (1879). Spiritualism: A satanic agency. London: Charing Cross Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Grünbaum A (1984). The foundations of psychoanalysis: A philosophical critique. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grünhut A (1932). Tanulmányok a spiritizmus köréből: magnetizmus, szomnambulizmus, mediumizmus [Essays in the Field of Spiritualism: Magnetism, Somnambulism, Mediumism]. Budapest: Szellemi Búvárok Pesti Egylete.
   Google Scholar
• Gyimesi J (2009). The problem of demarcation: Psychoanalysis and the occult. Am Imago 66(4):457–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyimes J (2011). Pszichoanalízis és spiritizmus [Psychoanalysis and Spiritualism]. Budapest: Typotex.
   Google Scholar
• Gyimesi J (2012). Sándor Ferenczi and the problem of telepathy. Hist Hum Sci 25:131–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynal A (1993). Ferenczi and the origins of psychoanalytic technique. In: Aron L, Harris A, editors. The legacy of Sándor Ferenczi, 53–74. London: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haynal A (1996). Viták a pszichoanalízisben: Freud, Ferenczi, Bálint. [Debates in psychoanalysis: Freud, Ferenczi, Bálint]. Budapest: Thalassa, Cserépfalvi.
   Google Scholar
• Haynal A (2003). Párbeszéd vagy párviadal? A Freud‐Ferenczi‐kapcsolat és a pszichoanalízis. [Conversation or combat? The Freud‐Ferenczi relationship and psychoanalysis]. Budapest: Gondolat.
   Google Scholar
• Hermann I (1963). A pszichoanalízis mint módszer [Psychoanalysis as method]. Budapest: Gondolat Kiadó.
   Google Scholar
• Hidas G (1993). Flowing over – transference, countertransference, telepathy. Subjective dimensions of the psychoanalytic relationship in Ferenczi's thinking. In: Aron L, Harris A, editors. The legacy of Sándor Ferenczi, 207–15. London: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hollós I (1933). ‘Psychopathologie alltäglicher telepathischer Erscheinungen’ [Psychopathology of everyday telepathic occurrences]. Imago 19:529–46.
   Google Scholar
• James W (1986[1886]). Report of the committee on mediumistic phenomena. In: Buckhart FH, Bowers F, Skrupskelis IK, editors. Essays in psychical research, 14–19. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
   Google Scholar
• Jephson I (1954). Psychoanalysis and the occult. J Soc Psych Res 37:235–43.
   Google Scholar
• Jones J (1871). Spiritualism the work of demons. Liverpool: Edward Howell.
   Google Scholar
• Jones E (1957). The life and the work of Sigmund Freud. Vol. 3, The last phase 1919–1939. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jung CG (1902).On the psychology and pathology of so‐called occult phenomena. Collected Papers on Analytical Psychology. New York: Moffat, Yard, 1916, 1–93.
   Google Scholar
• Jung CG (1948). Psychologie und spiritismus. Neue Schweizer Rundschau 16(7):430–5.
   Google Scholar
• Jung CG (1961). Memories, dreams, reflections. Jaffé A, editor. London: Fontana, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Jung CG (1934–1954). The archetypes and the collective unconscious. The Collected Works of C. G. Jung. Vol. IX. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Jung CG (2009). The red book: Liber novus. New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Kallós O (1933). A pszichoanalízis metapsychikai szempontból [Psychoanalysis from the point of view of metapsychics]. Metapsychikai Folyóirat, 273–6.
   Google Scholar
• Keeley JP (2001). Subliminal promptings: Psychoanalytic theory and the Society for Psychical Research. Am Imago 58:767–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keve T (2000). Triad: The physicists, the analysts, the kabbalists. London: Rosenberg & Krausz.
   Google Scholar
• Keve T (2012). Physics, metaphysics and psychoanalysis. In: Székács‐weisz J, Keve T, editors. Ferenczi and his world. Rekindling the spirit of the Budapest School. London: Karnac Books.
   Google Scholar
• Landeszman G (1982). Egy jósnő emlékkönyvei. [Diaries of a fortune‐teller]. Új Tükör 33:18–19.
   Google Scholar
• Luckhurst R (2002). The invention of telepathy, 1870–1901. Oxford: Oxford UP.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell TW (1938). The contributions of psychical research to psychotherapeutics. Proc Soc Psych Res 45:175–86.
   Google Scholar
• Monroe JW (2008). Laboratories of faith: Mesmerism, spiritism and occultism in modern France. Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP.
   Google Scholar
• Moreau C (1976). Freud et l'occultisme. Paris: Privat.
   Google Scholar
• Myers FWH (1903). Human personality and its survival of bodily death. London: Longmans, Green.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden CK (1926). The conversion of Freud. Psyche 6:1.
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheim J (1988). The other world: Spiritualism and psychical research in England, 1850–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
   Google Scholar
• Paskuaskas A, editor. (1993). The complete correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Ernest Jones. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
   Google Scholar
• Pataky Á (2003). Bevezetés a spiritológiába [Introduction to Spiritology]. Budapest: Magánkiadás.
   Google Scholar
• Podmore F (1902). Modern spiritualism: A history and a criticism. 2 vols. London: Methuen & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Rabeyron T, Evrard R (2012). Historical and contemporary perspectives on occultism in the Freud‐Ferenczi correspondence. Recherches en psychanalyse 13:98–111.
   Google Scholar
• Richet CR (1923). Thirty years of psychical research: Being a treatise on metapsychics. London: W. Collins & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Rickman J (1933). Obituary: Sandor Ferenczi. Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research 33:124–5.
   Google Scholar
• Róheim G (1932). Telepathy in a dream. Psychoanal Q 1:277–91.
   Google Scholar
• Roustang F (1983). Psychoanalysis never lets go. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins UP.
   Google Scholar
• Sabourin P (1985). Ferenczi: paladin et grand vizir secret. Paris: Édition Universitaires.
   Google Scholar
• Servadio E (1934). Psychoanalysis and telepathy. In: Devereux G, editor. Psychoanalysis and the occult. London: Souvenir Press, 1973, 211–20.
   Google Scholar
• Servadio E (1956). Transference and thought‐transference. Int J Psychoanal 37:392–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Servadio E (1963). Unconscious and paranormal factors in healing and recovery. London: Society for Psychical Research.
   Google Scholar
• Sincerus, (1899). Józan gondolkodás, ‐ határtalan elvakultság [Sober‐mindedness – infinite infatuation]. Rejtelmes Világ 36:97–101.
   Google Scholar
• Stekel W (1913). Telepathische Träume. Psychische Studien 40(3):156–65.
   Google Scholar
• Sulloway F (1979). Freud, biologist of the mind: Beyond the psychoanalytic legend. London: Burnett Books.
   Google Scholar
• Thurschwell P (1999). Ferenczi's dangerous proximities: Telepathy, psychosis and the real event. . Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 11(1):150–78.
   Google Scholar
• Thurschwell P (2001). Literature, technology and magical thinking, 1880–1920. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
   Google Scholar
• Tordai V (2010). Okkult elemek a magyarság életében [Occult elements in the life of the Hungarians]. Budapest: Hermit.
   Google Scholar
• Tóth B (1903). A spiritizmusról. [On spiritism] Budapest: Lampel Róbert (Wodianer F. és Fiai).
   Google Scholar
• Treitel C (2004). A science for the soul: Occultism and the genesis of the German modern. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins UP.
   Google Scholar
• Vay A (1869). Szellem, ero, anyag [Spirit, power, matter]. Budapest: Szellemi Búvárok Pesti Egylete, 1923.
   Google Scholar
• Vay A (1887). Aeonok. Elmélkedések és intelmek [Aeons. Reflections and remonstrances]. Budapest: Szellemi Búvárok Pesti Egylete, 1926.
   Google Scholar
• Wassilko‐serecki Z (1936). A haldoklók jelentkezéséről. [The appearance of the goners]. Metapsychikai Folyóirat 208–16:231–41.
   Google Scholar
• Wolffram H (2009). The stepchildren of science: Parapsychology and psychical research in Germany, c. 1870–1939. Clio Medica 88. The Wellcome Series in the History of Medicine. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Zumstein‐preiswerk S (1975). C. G. Jungs Medium. Die Geschichte der Helly Preiswerk [The medium of C. G. Jung: The history of Helly Preiswerk]. Munich: Kindler.
   Google Scholar