Sibling rivalry, separation, and change in Austen's Sense and Sensibility

References

• Austen J (1986 [1789]). Love and friendship. In: Beer F, editor. The juvenilia of Jane Austen and Charlotte Bronte, 99–128. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Austen J (1990 [1811]). Sense and Sensibility. Kinsley J, editor. Doody MA, introduction. Oxford: Oxford UP.
   Google Scholar
• Baudry F (2007). Absence, ambiguity, and the representation of creativity in Vermeer's The Art of Painting. Psychoanal Q 76:583–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom H (1975). A map of misreading. New York, NY: Oxford UP.
   Google Scholar
• Britton R (1989). The missing link: parental sexuality in the Oedipus complex. In: Steiner J, editor. The Oedipus complex today. London: Karnac Books.
   Google Scholar
• Britton R (1998). Belief and imagination: Explorations in psychoanalysis. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks P (1984). Reading for the plot. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
   Google Scholar
• Burke K (1957). Freud – and the analysis of poetry. In: The philosophy of literary form. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Butler M (1975). Jane Austen and the war of ideas. Oxford: Oxford UP.
   Google Scholar
• Chasseguet‐smirgel J (1991). Review: The Oedipus complex today: Clinical implications. Ed. J. Steiner. Int J Psychoanal 72:727–30.
   Google Scholar
• Edward J (2011). The sibling relationship: A force for growth and conflict. Plymouth: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Felman S (1977). Literature and psychoanalysis: The question of reading: otherwise. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins UP.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1917a). Mourning and melancholia. SE 14:237–58.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1917b). Introductory lectures on psycho‐analysis (Part III). SE 16:241–463.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1922). Some neurotic mechanisms in jealousy, paranoia and homosexuality. SE 18:221–32.
   Google Scholar
• Galperin W (2003). The historical Austen. Philadelphia, PA: Pennsylvania UP.
   Google Scholar
• Green A (1975). Orestes and Oedipus. Int R Psychoanal 2:355–64.
   Google Scholar
• Hanly C (1986). King Lear and his daughters. Int R Psychoanal 13:211–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hanly C (1990). Applied psychoanalysis. In: Moore BE, Fine BR, editors. Psychoanalysis: The major concepts. New Haven, CT: Yale UP.
   Google Scholar
• Honan P (1987). Jane Austen: Her life. New York, NY: St. Martin's Griffin.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson G (1992). Sibling love and incest in Jane Austen's fiction. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobus M (2005). The poetics of psychoanalysis: In the wake of Klein. Oxford: Oxford UP.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson C (1988). Jane Austen: Women, politics and the novel. Chicago, IL: Chicago UP.
   Google Scholar
• Kaes R (2008). Le complex fraternel. Paris: Dunod.
   Google Scholar
• Klein M (1975). Envy and gratitude and other works 1946–1963. Masud M, Khan R, editors. The International Psychoanalytical Library 104:1–346. London: Hogarth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knox‐shaw P (2004). Jane Austen and the enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
   Google Scholar
• Kris E (1952). Psychoanalytic explorations in art. New York, NY: International UP.
   Google Scholar
• Kristeva J (2007). Adolescence, a syndrome of ideality. Psychoanal Rev 94:715–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kulish N, Holtzman D (2000). The feminization of the female oedipal complex Part I: A reconsideration of the significance of separation issues. J Amer Psychoanal Assoc 48:1413–37.
   Google Scholar
• Kulish N, Holtzman D (2003). Countertransference and the female triangular situation. Int J Psychoanal 84:563–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer M (1966). Object loss and mourning during adolescence. Psychoanal St Child 21:269–93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Legoretta G (2013). Louis Kancyper. Canadian J Psychoanal 21:193–201.
   Google Scholar
• Mcdougall J (1972). Primal scene and sexual perversion. Int J Psychoanal 72:727–30.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell J (2003). Siblings: Sex and violence. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morini M (2009). Jane Austen's narrative techniques: A stylistic and pragmatic analysis. Surrey: Ashgate Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudrick M (1952). Jane Austen: Irony as defense and discovery. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP.
   Google Scholar
• Neubauer PB (1983). The importance of the sibling experience. Psychoanal St Child 38:325–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orgel S (1974). Sylvia Plath: Fusion with the victim and suicide. Psychoanal Q 43:262–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orgel S (1994). A psychoanalyst's reflections on Chekhov and The Three Sisters. Int J Psychoanal 75:133–48.
   Google Scholar
• Pinch A (1996). Strange fits of passion: From Hume to Austen. Chicago, IL: Chicago UP.
   Google Scholar
• Poland WS (2003). Reading fiction and psychoanalytic the experience: Proust on reading and on reading Proust. J Amer Psychoanal Assoc 51:1263–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provence S, Solnit AJ (1983). Development‐promoting aspects of the sibling experience. Psychoanal St Child 38:337–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinodoz J (1993). The taming of solitude: Separation anxiety in psychoanalysis. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schwaber P (2006). For better and for worst. Psychoanal St Child 61:294–307.
   Google Scholar
• Schwaber P (2007). Hamlet and psychoanalytic experience. J Amer Psychoanal Assoc 55:389–406.
   Google Scholar
• Segal H (1952). A psycho‐analytical approach to aesthetics. Int J Psychoanal 33:196–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharpe E (1929). The impatience of Hamlet. Int J Psychoanal 10:270–9.
   Google Scholar
• Sharpe EF (1946). From King Lear to the Tempest. Int J Psychoanal 27:19–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sharpe SA, Rosenblatt AD (1994). Oedipal sibling triangles. J Amer Psychoanal Assoc 42:491–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shengold L (1988). Dickens, Little Dorrit, and soul murder. Psychoanal Q 57:390–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shengold L (2004). Haunted by parents: A literary example of change meaning loss. Vincent Millay. Psychoanal Q 73:717–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skura M (1981). The literary use of the psychoanalytic process. New Haven, CT: Yale UP.
   Google Scholar
• Tanner (1986). Jane Austen. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
   Google Scholar
• Todd J (2006). The Cambridge introduction to Jane Austen. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
   Google Scholar
• Trilling L (1950). Freud and literature. In The liberal imagination. New York, NY: Viking Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiltshire J (2014). The hidden Jane Austen. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
   Google Scholar