References
- Baranger M, Baranger W (2009). The work of confluence: Listening and interpreting in the psychoanalytic field. Fiorini LG, editor. London: Karnac Books.
- Bass A (2015). The dialogue of unconsciouses, mutual analysis and the uses of the self in contemporary relational psychoanalysis. Psychoanal Dial 25:2–17.
- Bion WR (1962). Learning from experience. New York: Basic Books.
- Bion WR (1970). Attention and interpretation. London: Heinemann.
- Bollas C (1987). Expressive uses of the countertransference. In: The shadow of the object, 200–35. New York: Columbia UP.
- Bollas C (1992). Being a character. New York: Hill and Wang.
- Bollas C (1995). Cracking up: The work of unconscious experience. New York: Hill and Wang.
- Bollas C (2001). Freudian intersubjectivity: Commentary on paper by Julie Gerhardt and Annie Sweetnam. Psychoanal Dial 11:93–105.
- Bolognini S (2011). Secret passages: The theory and technique of interpsychic relations. New York: Routledge.
- Botella S, Botella C (2005). The work of psychic figurability: Mental states without representation. New York: Routledge.
- Brown LJ (2011). Intersubjective processes and the unconscious. New York: Routledge.
- Davoine F, Gaudilliere JM (2004). History beyond trauma. New York: Other Books.
- De M'uzan M (1983). The person of myself. In: Death and Identity: Being and the Psycho‐Sexual Drama, 49–66. London: Karnac Books.
- De M'uzan M (1978). If I were dead. Int Rev Psychoanal 5:485–90.
- De m'uzan M (1999). The paraphrenic twin or at the frontiers of identity. In: Death and identity: Being and the psycho‐sexual drama, 101–18. London: Karnac Books.
- De m'uzan M (2013 [1989]). During the session: Considerations on the analyst's mental functioning. In: Death and identity: Being and the psycho‐sexual drama, 79–97. London: Karnac Books.
- Diamond MJ (2014). Analytic mind use and interpsychic communication: Driving force in analytic technique, pathway to unconscious mental life. Psychoanal Q 83:525–63.
- Eigen M (2011). Contact with the depths. London: Karnac Books.
- Ferro A, Civitarese G (2015). The analytic field and its transformations. London: Karnac Books.
- Freud S (1912). Recommendations to physicians practicing psycho‐analysis. SE 12:215–26.
- Green A (1975). The analyst, symbolization and absence in the analytic setting (On changes in analytic practice and analytic experience). Int J Psychoanal 56:1–22.
- Grotstein JS (2000). Who is the dreamer, who dreams the dream? A study of psychic presences. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
- Katz G (2014). The play within the play: The enacted dimension of analytic process. New York: Routledge.
- Kohon G (1999). No lost certainties to be recovered. London: Karnac Books.
- Ogden TH (1994a). Projective identification and the subjugating third. In: Subjects of analysis, 97–106. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
- Ogden TH (1994b). The analytic third: Working with intersubjective clinical facts. In: Subjects of analysis, 61–95. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
- Ogden TH (1994c). The Freudian subject. In: Subjects of analysis, 13–31. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
- Ogden TH (1994d). Toward an intersubjective conception of the subject: The Kleinian contribution. In: Subjects of analysis, 33–48. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
- Ogden TH (1994e). Winnicott's intersubjective subject. In: Subjects of analysis, 49–60. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
- Reis B (1999a). Thomas Ogden's phenomenological turn. Psychoanal Dial 9:371–93.
- Reis B (1999b). Adventures of the dialectic. Psychoanal Dial 9:407–14.
- Reis B (2006). Even better than the real thing. Contemp Psychoanal 42:177–96.
- Reis B (2007). Sensing and (analytic) sensibilities: Some thoughts following Eyal Rozmarin's “an other in psychoanalysis”. Contemp Psychoanal 43:374–85.
- Reis B (2009a). Performative and enactive features of psychoanalytic witnessing: The transference as the scene of address. Int J Psychoanal 90:1359–72.
- Reis B (2009b). We: Commentary on papers by Trevarthen, Ammaniti and Trentini, and Gallese. Psychoanal Dial 19:565–79.
- Reis B (2010a). Enactive fields: An approach to interaction in the Kleinian‐Bionian Model: Commentary on paper by Lawrence. J. Brown. Psychoanal Dial 20:695–703.
- Reis B (2010b). A human family: Commentary on paper by Elisabeth Fivaz‐Depeursinge, Chloé Lavanchy‐Scaiola, and Nicolas Favez. Psychoanal Dial 20:151–57.
- Reis B (2011a), Zombie states: Reconsidering the relationship between life and death instincts. Psychoanal Q LXXX:269–86.
- Reis B (2011b). Reading Kohut through Husserl. Psychoanal Inq 31:75–83.
- Roussillon R (2011). Drives and intersubjectivity. In: Primitive agony and symbolization, 29–48. London: Karnac Books.