REFERENCES
- Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera‐viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2009). h‐index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields. Journal of Informetrics, 3, 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.04.001
- Bennett, D., Roberts, L., Ananthram, S., & Broughton, M. (2018). What is required to develop career pathways for teaching academics? Higher Education, 75, 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0138-9
- Bentley, P. J., Goedegebuure, L., & Meek, V. L. (2014). Australian academics, teaching and research: History, vexed issues and potential changes. In J. C. Shin, A. Arimoto, W. K. Cummings, & U. Teichler (Eds.), Teaching and research in contemporary higher education (pp. 357–377). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
- Clements, A., Darroch, P. I., & Green, J. (2017). Snowball metrics—Providing a robust methodology to inform research strategy—But do they help? Procedia Computer Science, 106, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.03.003
- Elsevier. (2017). Scopus: Content coverage guide. Retrieved from https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus/how-scopus-works/content
- Fanelli, D., & Larivière, V. (2016). Researchers' individual publication rate has not increased in a century. PLoS One, 11(3), e0149504. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149504
- Flavell, H., Roberts, L., Fyfe, G., & Broughton, M. (2018). Shifting goal posts: The impact of academic workforce reshaping and the introduction of teaching academic roles on the scholarship of teaching and learning. The Australian Educational Researcher, 45, 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-017-0247-6
- García‐pérez, M. A. (2010). Accuracy and completeness of publication and citation records in the Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar: A case study for the computation of h indices in psychology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 2070–2085. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21372
- Harzing, A.‐W., & Alakangas, S. (2016). Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A longitudinal and cross‐disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 106, 787–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9
- Harzing, A. W., Alakangas, S., & Adams, D. (2014). hIa: An individual annual h‐index to accommodate disciplinary and career length differences. Scientometrics, 99, 811–821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1208-0
- Haslam, N., Stratemeyer, M., & Vargas‐saenz, A. (2017). Scholarly productivity and citation impact of academic psychologists in group of eight universities. Australian Journal of Psychology, 69, 162–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12142
- Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
- IBM Corp. (2015). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0. Armonk, NY: Author.
- Malouff, J., Schutte, N., & Pirest, J. (2010). Publication rates of Australian academic psychologists. Australian Psychologist, 45, 78–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050060903078536
- Martin‐sardesai, A., Irvine, H., Tooley, S., & Guthrie, J. (2017). Government research evaluations and academic freedom: A UK and Australian comparison. Higher Education Research & Development, 36, 372–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1208156
- Mcnally, G. P. (2010). Scholarly productivity, impact, and quality among academic psychologists at group of eight universities. Australian Journal of Psychology, 62, 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049531003667406
- National Health and Medical Research Council. (2018). Consultation on the development of peer review for NHMRC's new grant program final report. Retrieved from https://nhmrc.gov.au/funding/new-grant-program/peer-review
- Smith, K. M., Crookes, E., & Crookes, P. A. (2013). Measuring research ‘impact’ for academic promotion: Issues from the literature. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35, 410–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2013.812173