Protection motivation theory and pro‐environmental behaviour: A systematic mapping review

REFERENCES

• Ahern, L. (2008). Psychological responses to environmental messages: The roles of environmental values, message issue distance, message efficacy and idealistic construal (PhD). Penn State.
   Google Scholar
• Almarshad, S. O. (2017). Adopting sustainable behavior in institutions of higher education: A study on intentions of decision makers in the MENA region. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 6(2), 89–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta‐analysis of psycho‐social determinants of pro‐environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bockarjova, M., & Steg, L. (2014). Can Protection Motivation Theory predict pro‐environmental behavior? Explaining the adoption of electric vehicles in The Netherlands. Global Environmental Change, 28, 276–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bubeck, P., Wouter botzen, W. J., Laudan, J., Aerts, J. C. J. H., & Thieken, A. H. (2017). Insights into flood‐coping appraisals of protection motivation theory: Empirical evidence from Germany and France. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of The Society For Risk Analysis, 38(6), 1239–1257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campis, L. K., Prentice‐dunn, S., & Lyman, R. D. (1989). Coping appraisal and parents' intentions to inform their children about sexual abuse: A protection motivation theory analysis. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 8(3), 304–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M.‐F. (2016). Impact of fear appeals on pro‐environmental behavior and crucial determinants. International Journal of Advertising, 35(1), 74–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cismaru, M., Cismaru, R., Ono, T., & Nelson, K. (2011). “Act on climate change”: An application of protection motivation theory. Social Marketing Quarterly, 17(3), 62–84.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, S., & Brook, A. (2005). Can psychology help save the world? A model for conservation psychology. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 5(1), 87–102.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, R., Campbell, R., Hildon, Z., Hobbs, L., & Michie, S. (2015). Theories of behaviour and behaviour change across the social and behavioural sciences: a scoping review. Health Psychology Review, 9(3), 323–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, L. (2017). The importance of threat, strategy, and resource appraisals for long‐term proactive risk management among forest owners in Sweden. Journal of Risk Research, 20(7), 868–886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd, D. L., Prentice‐dunn, S., & Rogers, R. W. (2001). A meta‐analysis of research on protection motivation theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(2), 407–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J., Eccles, M. P., Johnston, M., Walker, A. E., Grimshaw, J. M., Foy, R., … Bonetti, D. (2004). Constructing questionnaires based on the theory of planned behaviour: A manual for health services researchers. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Centre for Health Services Research, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, G. T., & Stern, P. C. (2008). The short list: The most effective actions US households can take to curb climate change. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 50(5), 12–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnett, S. T., & Lindenmayer, D. B. (2011). Conservation science must engender hope to succeed. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 26(2), 59–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatersleben, B. (2012). The psychology of sustainable transport. Psychologist, 25(9), 676–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T. (2011). Assessing a combined theories approach to climate change communication (PhD). Las Vegas: University of Nevada.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, N. L., & Taplin, R. (2007). Solar festivals and climate bills: Comparing NGO climate change campaigns in the UK and Australia. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 18(4), 317–338 Retrieved from JSTOR.
   Google Scholar
• Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermann, N., & Menzel, S. (2013). Predicting the intention to support the return of wolves: A quantitative study with teenagers. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 153–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horng, J.‐S., Hu, M.‐L. M., Teng, C.‐C. C., & Lin, L. (2014). Energy saving and carbon reduction behaviors in tourism—A perception study of Asian visitors from a protection motivation theory perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 19(6), 721–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huenchuleo, C., Barkmann, J., & Villalobos, P. (2012). Social psychology predictors for the adoption of soil conservation measures in Central Chile. Land Degradation & Development (Formerly Land Degradation and Rehabilitation), 23(5), 483–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, E., & Röös, E. (2016). Fear of climate change consequences and predictors of intentions to alter meat consumption. Food Policy, 62, 151–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huth, W. L., Mcevoy, D. M., & Morgan, O. A. (2018). Controlling an invasive species through consumption: The case of lionfish as an impure public good. Ecological Economics, 149(C), 74–79.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, H., & Al‐ajlouni, M. M. Q. (2001). Sustainable consumption. Management Decision, 56(3), 610–633.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2018). Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre‐industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, F. G., & Wilson, M. (2004). Goal‐directed conservation behavior: The specific composition of a general performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(7), 1531–1544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantola, S. J., Syme, G. J., & Nesdale, A. R. (1983). The effects of appraised severity and efficacy in promoting water conservation: An informational analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13(2), 164–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keshavarz, M., & Karami, E. (2016). Farmers' pro‐environmental behavior under drought: Application of protection motivation theory. Journal of Arid Environments, 127, 128–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, L. R., Bekessy, S. A., & Garrard, G. E. (2019). Neither hope nor fear: Empirical evidence should drive biodiversity conservation strategies. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 34(4), 278–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2019.01.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., Jeong, S.‐H., & Hwang, Y. (2013). Predictors of pro‐environmental behaviors of American and Korean Students: The application of the theory of reasoned action and protection motivation theory. Science Communication, 35(2), 168–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koger, S. M., & Winter, D. D. (2011). The psychology of environmental problems: Psychology for sustainability. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laffoley, D. D., & Baxter, J. (Eds.). (2016). Explaining ocean warming: Causes, scale, effects and consequences. Switzerland: IUCN Gland.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, S.‐P. (2015). Predicting support of climate policies by using a protection motivation model. Climate Policy, 15(3), 321–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langbroek, J. H. M., Franklin, J. P., & Susilo, Y. O. (2016). The effect of policy incentives on electric vehicle adoption. Energy Policy, 94, 94–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, F., & Dewitte, S. (2019). Measuring pro‐environmental behavior: Review and recommendations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 63, 92–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, L. R., Stedman, R. C., Cooper, C. B., & Decker, D. J. (2015). Understanding the multi‐dimensional structure of pro‐environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 112–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebek, B., Uffen, J., Neumann, M., Hohler, B., & Breitner, M. H. (2014). Information security awareness and behavior: A theory‐based literature review. Management Research Review, 37(12), 1049–1092.
   Google Scholar
• Maddux, J. E., & Rogers, R. W. (1983). Protection motivation and self‐efficacy: A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19(5), 469–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mankad, A., Greenhill, M., Tucker, D., & Tapsuwan, S. (2013). Motivational indicators of protective behaviour in response to urban water shortage threat. Journal of Hydrology, 491, 100–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markelj, J. (2009). Using protection motivation theory to examine environmental communications: The review of in‐home energy saving advertisements. International Journal of Sustainability Communication, 4, 113–124.
   Google Scholar
• Markle, G. L. (2013). Pro‐environmental behavior: Does it matter how it's measured? Development and validation of the pro‐environmental behavior scale (PEBS). Human Ecology, 41(6), 905–914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mceachan, R. R. C., Conner, M., Taylor, N. J., & Lawton, R. J. (2011). Prospective prediction of health‐related behaviours with the theory of planned behaviour: A meta‐analysis. Health Psychology Review, 5(2), 97–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milne, S., Sheeran, P., & Orbell, S. (2000). Prediction and intervention in health‐related behavior: A meta‐analytic review of protection motivation theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(1), 106–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, K., Cismaru, M., Cismaru, R., & Ono, T. (2011). Water management information campaigns and protection motivation theory. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 8(2), 163–193.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbet, E. K. L., & Gick, M. L. (2008). Can health psychology help the planet? Applying theory and models of health behaviour to environmental actions. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(4), 296–303. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, P., Boer, H., Seydel, E. R., & Mullan, B. (2015). Protection motivation theory. In Predicting and changing health behaviour: Research and practice with social cognition models (3rd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osbaldiston, R., & Schott, J. P. (2012). Environmental sustainability and behavioral science: Meta‐analysis of proenvironmental behavior experiments. Environment and Behavior, 44(2), 257–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike, C., Doppelt, B., & Herr, M. (2010). Climate communications and behavior change: A guide for practitioners. Retrieved from Climate Leadership Initiative website: https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/handle/1794/10708.
   Google Scholar
• Prentice‐dunn, S., & Rogers, R. W. (2001). Protection motivation theory and preventive health: Beyond the Health Belief Model. Health Education Research, 1(3), 153–161.
   Google Scholar
• Pronello, C., & Gaborieau, J.‐B. (2018). Engaging in pro‐environment travel behaviour research from a psycho‐social perspective: A review of behavioural variables and theories. Sustainability, 10(7), 2412. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainear, A. M., & Christensen, J. L. (2017). Protection motivation theory as an explanatory framework for proenvironmental behavioral intentions. Communication Research Reports, 34(3), 239–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renner, B., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). Risk and health behaviors: Documentation of the scales of the research project: “Risk Appraisal Consequences in Korea” (RACK). Retrieved from http://www.gesundheitsrisiko.de/docs/RACKEnglish.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rettie, R., Burchell, K., & Riley, D. (2012). Normalising green behaviours: A new approach to sustainability marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(3–4), 420–444.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez‐priego, N., & Montoro‐rios, F. J. (2018). How cultural beliefs and the response to fear appeals shape consumer's purchasing behavior toward sustainable products. In A. Leal‐millan, M. Peris‐ortiz, & A. Leal‐rodríguez (Eds.), Sustainability in innovation and entrepreneurship. Innovation, technology, and knowledge management. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. W., Prentice‐dunn, S., & Gochman, D. S. (1997). Protection motivation theory. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiter, R. A. C., Kessels, L. T. E., Peters, G.‐J. Y., & Kok, G. (2014). Sixty years of fear appeal research: Current state of the evidence. International Journal of Psychology: Journal International De Psychologie, 49(2), 63–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharks, T. (2016). Threatening Messages in Climate Change Communication (Thesis, University of Washington). Retrieved from https://digital.lib.washington.edu:443/researchworks/handle/1773/36393.
   Google Scholar
• Sniehotta, F. F., Presseau, J., & Araújo‐soares, V. (2014). Time to retire the theory of planned behaviour. Health Psychology Review, 8(1), 1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snilstveit, B., Vojtkova, M., Bhavsar, A., Stevenson, J., & Gaarder, M. (2016). Evidence & gap maps: A tool for promoting evidence informed policy and strategic research agendas. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 79, 120–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staats, H. (2003). Understanding proenvironmental attitudes and behavior: An analysis and review of research based on the theory of planned behavior. In M. Bonnes, T. Lee, & M. Bonaiuto (Eds.), Psychological theories for environmental issues (pp. 171–201). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Steel, B. S. (1996). Thinking globally and acting locally? Environmental attitudes, behaviour and activism. Journal of Environmental Management, 47(1), 27–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swim, J. K., Clayton, S., & Howard, G. S. (2011). Human behavioral contributions to climate change: Psychological and contextual drivers. American Psychologist, 66(4), 251–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapsuwan, S., Mankad, A., Greenhill, M., & Tucker, D. (2017). The influence of coping appraisals on the adoption of decentralised water systems in Australia. Urban Water Journal, 14(1), 45–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truelove, H. B., & Gillis, A. J. (2018). Perception of pro‐environmental behavior. Global Environmental Change, 49, 175–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlek, C., & Steg, L. (2007). Human behavior and environmental sustainability: Problems, driving forces, and research topics. Journal of Social Issues, 63(1), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, G., Cavusgil, E., & Zhao, Y. (2016). A protection motivation explanation of base‐of‐pyramid consumers' environmental sustainability. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 116–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar