675
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Exploring the in‐session reflective capacity of clinical psychology trainees: An interpersonal process recall study

, &
Pages 122-130 | Received 15 Jan 2013, Accepted 03 Apr 2013, Published online: 09 Nov 2020

References

  • Andersen, T. (1987). The reflecting team: Dialogue and meta‐dialogue in clinical work. Family Process, 26, 415–423. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545‐5300.1987.00415.x.
  • Anderson, H., & Goolishian, H. (1992). The client is the expert: A not‐knowing approach to therapy. In S. Mcnamee & K. Bergen (Eds.), Therapy as social construction (pp. 193–198). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Bennett‐levy, J. (2006). Therapy skills: A cognitive model of their acquisition and refinement. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 34, 57–78. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465805002420.
  • Bennett‐levy, J., & Thwaites, R. (2007). Self and self‐reflection in the therapeutic relationship: A conceptual map and practical strategies for the training, supervision and self‐supervision of interpersonal skills. In P. Gilbert & R. Leahy (Eds.), The Therapeutic Relationship in the Cognitive Behavioural Therapies (pp. 255–281). London: Routledge.
  • Bennett‐levy, J., Thwaites, R., Chadwick, A., & Davis, M. (2009). Reflective practice in cognitive behavioural therapy: The engine of lifelong learning. In R. Stedmon & J. Dallos (Eds.), Reflective Practice in Psychotherapy and Counselling (pp. 115–135). London: Open University Press.
  • Borders, L. (1986). Facilitating supervisee growth: Implications of developmental models of counselling supervision. Michigan Journal of Counselling and Development, 17(2), 7–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022‐0167.36.2.163.
  • British Psychological Society (2010). Accreditation through partnership handbook: Guidance for clinical psychology programmes. Leicester: British Psychological Society.
  • Cartwright, C., & Read, J. (2011). An exploratory investigation of psychologists' responses to a method for considering “objective” countertransference. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 40(1), 46–54.
  • Chiovitti, R., & Piran, N. (2003). Rigour and grounded theory research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 44(4), 427–435. doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0309‐2402.2003.02822.x.
  • Cushway, D., & Gatherer, A. (2003). Reflecting on reflection. Clinical Psychology, 27, 6–10.
  • Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 20(1), 43–63.
  • Denzin, N. (1970). The Research Act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Chicago: Aldine.
  • Gabbard, G. (2001). A contemporary psychoanalytic model of countertransference. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57(8), 983–991.
  • Hayes, S., Barlow, D., & Nelson‐gray, R. (1999). The science‐practitioner research and accountability in the age of managed care. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Health Professions Council (2009). Standards of Proficiency: Practitioner psychologists. London: Health Professions Council.
  • Heppner, P., Rosenberg, J., & Hedgespeth, P. (2008). Three methods in measuring the therapeutic process: Clients' and counselors' constructions of the therapeutic process versus actual therapeutic events. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 39(1), 20–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022‐0167.39.1.20.
  • Hill, C., Charles, D., & Reed, K. (1981). A longitudinal analysis of changes in counseling skills during doctoral training in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32, 3–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022‐0167.28.5.428.
  • Kagan, N. (1969). Interpersonal process recall. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 148, 365–374.
  • Kagan, N. (1975). Influencing human interaction: Eleven years with IPR. The Canadian Counsellor, 9, 74–97.
  • Kagan, N., Krathwohl, D., & Miller, R. (1963a). Stimulated recall in therapy using videotape: A case study. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 10(3), 237–243. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045497.
  • Kagan, N., Krathwohl, D. R., & Miller, R. (1963b). Studies in human interaction: Interpersonal process recall simulated by videotape. East Lansing: Michigan State University.
  • Kazantzis, N., & Munro, M. (2011). The emphasis on cognitive‐behavioural therapy within clinical psychology training at Australian and New Zealand universities: A survey of program directors. Australian Psychologist, 46, 49–54.
  • Larsen, D., Flesaker, K., & Stege, R. (2008). Qualitative interviewing using Interpersonal Process Recall: Investigating internal experiences during professional‐client interactions. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7(1), 18–37.
  • Lavender, T. (2003). Redressing the balance: The place, history and future of reflective practice in clinical training. Clinical Psychology, 27, 11–15.
  • Levitt, H. (2001). Sounds of silence in psychotherapy: The categorisation of clients' pauses. Psychotherapy Research, 11, 295–309. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/713663985.
  • Lokken, J., & Twohey, D. (2004). American Indian perspectives on Euro American counseling behavior. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 32, 320–331. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161‐1912.2004.tb00628.x.
  • Mcleod, J. (2001). Qualitative research in counselling and psychotherapy. London: Sage.
  • Nutt‐williams, E., & Hill, C. (1996). The relationship between self‐talk and therapy process variables for novice therapists. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 170–177. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022‐0167.43.2.170.
  • O'donovan, A., & Dyck, M. (2001). Effective training in clinical and counselling psychology: Not as simple as it sounds. Australian Psychologist, 36(2), 92–98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00050060108259640.
  • Overholser, J. C. (2011). Collaborative empiricism, guided discovery, and the Socratic method: Core processes for effective cognitive therapy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 18, 62–66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468‐2850.2011.01235.x.
  • Pica, M. (1998). The ambiguous nature of clinical training and its impact on the development of student clinicians. Psychotherapy, 35, 361–365. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087840.
  • Racker, H. (2010). Transference and Counter‐Transference. London: Karnac Books.
  • Rober, P. (2002). Some hypotheses about hesitations and their nonverbal expression in family therapy practice. Journal of Family Therapy, 24, 187–204. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467‐6427.00211.
  • Rober, P., Elliott, R., Buysse, A., Loots, G., & De corte, K. (2008). Positioning in the therapist's inner conversation: A dialogical model based on a grounded theory analysis of therapist reflections. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 34, 406–421. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752‐0606.2008.00080.x.
  • Rønnestad, M. H., & Skovholt, T. (2003). The journey of the counselor and therapist: Research findings and perspectives on professional development. Journal of Career Development, 30(1), 5–44.
  • Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Temple Smith.
  • Selvini palazzoli, M., Boscolo, L., Cecchin, G., & Prata, G. (1980). Hypothesizing‐circularity‐neutrality. Family Process, 19, 73–85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752‐0606.2008.00080.x.
  • Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation analysis: An introduction. Chichester, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell.
  • Spellman, D., & Harper, D. (1996). Failure, mistakes, regret and other subjugated stories in family therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 18, 205–214. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‐6427.1996.tb00044.x.
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
  • Trierweiler, S., & Stricker, G. (1997). The scientific practice of professional psychology. New York: Plenum.
  • Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J., & Jackson, D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication. A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: Norton.
  • Zeigler, J. N., Kanas, N., Strull, W. M., & Bennet, N. E. (1984). A stress discussion group for medical interns. Journal of Medical Education, 59, 205–207.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.