371
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Creating Learning Opportunities for Teachers and Students: A Cultural‐Historical Understanding of Classroom Research

&
Pages 233-260 | Published online: 07 Jan 2015

References

  • Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81, 132–169.
  • Alderson, P. (2000). Children as researchers: The effects of participation rights on research. In P. Christensen & A. James (Eds.), Research with children: Perspectives and practices (pp. 241–257). London: Routledge.
  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1994). Problemy poètiki tvorčestvogo Dostoevskogo [Problems of the poetics in the work of Dostoevsky]. Kiev, Russia: Next. (Original work published 1929)
  • Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 1–14.
  • Bednarz, N. (2008). Collaborative research and professional development of teachers in mathematics. In Tenth international congress on mathematical education. Copenhagen, Denmark: IMFUFA, Roskilde University. Retrieved August 31, 2011, from www.icme10.dk/proceedings/pages/regular_pdf/RL_Nadine_Bednarz.pdf
  • Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141–178.
  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, S. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
  • Clandinin, D. J. (2007). Preface. In D. J. Clandinin (Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp. ix–xvii). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Clark, C., Moss, P. A., Goering, S., Hener, R. J., Lamar, B., Leonard, D., et al. (1996). Collaboration as teachers and researchers engaged in conversation and professional development. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 193–231.
  • Cobb, P. (2000). Conducting classroom teaching experiments in collaboration with teachers. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 307–334). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Cole, A. L., & Knowles, J. G. (1993). Teacher development partnership research: A focus on methods and issues. American Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 473–495.
  • Craig, C. J. (2012). Tensions in teacher development and community: Variations on a recurring school reform theme. Teachers College Record, 114. Retrieved August 4, 2012, from www.tcrecord.org/library/abstract.asp?contentid=16260
  • Drijvers, P., & Trouche L. (2008). From artifacts to instruments: A theoretical framework behind the orchestra metaphor. In K. Heid & G. Blume (Eds.), Research on technology and the teaching and learning of mathematics (vol. 2, pp. 363–392). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
  • Durkheim, É. (1919). Les règles de la méthode sociologique [The rules of sociological method]. Paris: Felix Alcan.
  • Ehn, P. (1992). Scandinavian design: On participation and skill. In P. S. Adler & T. A. Winograd (Eds.), Usability: Turning technologies into tools (pp. 96–132). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
  • Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
  • Engeström, Y. (2005). Developmental work research: Expanding activity theory in practice. Berlin, Germany: Lehmanns Media.
  • Feldman, A., & Weiss, T. (2010). Understanding identity change through collaborative action research: A cultural-historical activity theory analysis. Educational Action Research, 18(1), 29–55.
  • Fielding, M., & Bragg, S. (2003). Students as researchers: Making a difference. Cambridge, UK: Pearson.
  • Goldstein, L. S. (2002). Moving beyond collaboration: Re-describing research relationships with classroom teachers, Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8, 155–170.
  • Gravemeijer, K. (1994). Educational development and developmental research in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 443–471.
  • Holzkamp, K. (1993). Lernen: Subjektwissenschaftliche Grundlegung [Learning: Subject-scientific foundation]. Frankfurt, Germany: Campus.
  • Husserl, E. (1939). Die Frage nach dem Ursprung der Geometrie als intentional-historisches Problem [The question of the origin of geometry as intentional-historical problem]. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 1, 203–225.
  • Il'enkov, E. V. (1982). Dialectics of the abstract and the concrete in Marx's Capital. Moscow, Russia: Progress Publishers.
  • John-Steiner, V., Weber, R., & Minnis, M. (1998). The challenge of studying collaboration. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 773–783.
  • Kozulin, A., Gindis, B., Ageyev, V. S., & Miller S. M. (Eds.). (2003). Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Leont'ev, A. N. (1983). Dejatel'nost'. Soznanie. Ličnost'. [Activity, consciousness, personality]. In Izbrannye psixhologičeskie proizvedenija vol. 2 (pp. 94–231). Moscow, Russia: Pedagogika. (German: Tätigkeit, Bewußtsein, Persönlichkeit. Cologne, Germany: Pahl-Rugenstein, 1982.)
  • Leontjew, A. A. (1971). Sprache—Sprechen—Sprechtätigkeit [Language—speech—speech activity]. Stuttgart, Germany: W. Kohlhammer. (Russian original partially available at http://pedlib.ru/Books/4/0285/4_0285-1.shtml)
  • Lerman, S. (2001). Cultural, discursive psychology: A sociocultural approach to studying the teaching and learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46, 87–113.
  • Marx, K./Engels, F. (1958). Werke Band 3: Die deutsche Ideologie [Works vol. 3: The German ideology]. Berlin, Germany: Dietz.
  • Marx, K./Engels, F. (1962). Werke Band 23: Das Kapital [Works vol. 23: Capital]. Berlin, Germany: Dietz.
  • Michener, L., Cook, J., Ahmed, S. M., Yonas, M. A., Coyne-Beasley, T., & Aguilar-Gaxiola, S. (2012). Aligning the goals of community-engaged research: Why and how academic health centers can successfully engage with communities to improve health. Academic Medicine, 87, 285–291.
  • Miller, P. H., & Coyle, T. R. (1999). Developmental change: Lesson from microgenesis. In E. K. Scholnick, K. Nelson, S. A. Gelman, & P. H. Miller (Eds.), Conceptual development: Piaget's legacy (pp. 209–239). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Oja, S. N., & Smulyan, L. (1989). Collaborative action research (vol. 7). New York: Falmer.
  • Orr, J. (1997). The same but different: Classroom-based collaborative research and the work of classrooms. In H. Christiansen, L. Goulet, C. Krentz, & M. Maeers (Eds.), Recreating relationships: Collaboration and educational reform (pp. 247–262). Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Oslund, J. A. (2012). Mathematics-for-teaching: What can be learned from the ethnopoetics of teachers' stories. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79, 293–309.
  • Pontecorvo, C. (2007). On the conditions for generative collaboration: Learning through collaborative research. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 41, 178–186.
  • Ritchie, S. M., & Rigano, D. L. (2001). Researcher-participant positioning in classroom research. Qualitative Studies in Education, 14, 741–756.
  • Roth, W.-M. (2004). Activity theory in education: An introduction. Mind, Culture, & Activity, 11, 1–8.
  • Roth, W.-M. (2011). Geometry as objective science in elementary school classrooms: Mathematics in the flesh. New York: Routledge.
  • Roth, W.-M. (2012). Societal mediation of mathematical cognition and learning. Orbis Scholae, 6(2).
  • Roth, W.-M., & Bowen, G. M. (1994). Mathematization of experience in a grade 8 open-inquiry environment: An introduction to the representational practices of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 293–318.
  • Roth, W.-M., & Lee, Y. J. (2007). “Vygotsky's neglected legacy”: Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77, 186–232.
  • Roth, W.-M., & Radford, L. (2010). Re/thinking the zone of proximal development (symmetrically). Mind, Culture, and Activity, 17, 209–307.
  • Roth, W.-M., & Radford, L. (2011). A cultural-historical perspective on mathematics teaching and learning. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.
  • Roth, W.-M., & Thom, J. (2009). Bodily experience and mathematical conceptions: From classical views to a phenomenological reconceptualization. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70, 175–189.
  • Roth, W.-M., & Tobin, K. (2002). At the elbow of another: Learning to teach by coteaching. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Roth, W.-M., Tobin, K., Carambo, C., & Dalland, C. (2004). Coteaching: Creating resources for learning and learning to teach chemistry in urban high schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 882–904.
  • Roth, W.-M., Tobin, K., Zimmermann, A., Bryant, N., & Davis, C. (2002). Lessons on/from the dihybrid cross: An activity theoretical study of learning in coteaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 253–282.
  • Scott, W. (2003). Participant observation research: A deconstruction of researcher-participant relationship. Education Research and Perspectives, 30, 94–104.
  • Smyth, J. (1991). Teachers as collaborative learners. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
  • Stauffer, S., Heath, M. A., Coyne, S. M., & Ferrin, S. (2012). High school teachers' perceptions of cyberbullying prevention and intervention strategies. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 352–367.
  • Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In R. Lesh & A. E. Kelly (Eds.), Research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267–307). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Tobin, K. (1999). Teachers as researchers and researchers as teachers. Research in Science Education, 29, 1–3.
  • Tobin, K., & Roth, W.-M. (2006). Teaching to learn: A view from the field. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.
  • Vygotskij, L. S. (2005). Konkretnaj psykhologija cheloveka [Concrete human psychology]. In Psykhologija rasvitija cheloveka (pp. 1020–1034). Moscow, Russia: Eksmo.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Wagner, J. (1997). The unavoidable intervention of educational research: A framework for reconsidering researcher-practitioner cooperation. Educational Researcher, 26(7), 13–22.
  • Walker, D. F. (1992). Methodological issues in curriculum research. In P. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 98–118). New York: Macmillan.
  • Wallace, N. L. (2007). Using cultural-historical activity theory to examine the praxis of teachers in a school site embedded professional development model: A case study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Pepperdine University, Malibu, CA.
  • Wassell, B., & Stith, I. (2007). Becoming an urban physics and math teacher. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
  • Williams, K. P. (2012). The devil is in the details: Community based participatory research. Journal of Cancer Education, 27, 3–4.
  • Wong, E. D. (1995). Challenges confronting the researcher/teacher: Conflicts of purpose and conduct. Educational Researcher, 24(3), 22–28.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.