647
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Effects Beyond Effectiveness: Teaching as a Performative Act

Pages 261-288 | Published online: 07 Jan 2015

References

  • Akhimien, P. E. (2010). Perlocution: Healing the “Achilles' heel” of speech act theory. California Linguistic Notes, 35(1). Retrieved February 25, 2011, from http://hss.fullerton.edu/linguistics/cln/W10PDF/Akhimien-Perlocution.pdf
  • Alexander, B. K., Anderson, G. L., & Gallegos, B. P. (Eds.). (2005). Performance theories in education: Power, pedagogy, and the politics of identity. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • American Educational Research Association. (2009). Standards for reporting on humanities-oriented research in AERA publications. Educational Researcher, 38(6), 481–486.
  • Andersen, P. (2007). Nonverbal communication: Forms and functions (2nd ed.). Long Grove, IL: Waveland.
  • Anderson, L., Evertson, C., & Brophy, J. (1979). An experimental study of effective teaching in first-grade reading groups. Elementary School Journal, 79(4), 193–223.
  • Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
  • Austin, J. L. (1979). Performative utterances. In J. O. Urmson & G. J. Warnock (Eds.), Philosophical papers (pp. 233–252). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Bach, K., & Harnish, R. M. (1979). Linguistic communication and speech acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Four essays by M. Bakhtin (M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
  • Britzman, D. (2003). After-education: Anna Freud, Melanie Klein, and psychoanalytic histories of learning. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Burke, K. (1950). A rhetoric of motives. New York: Prentice-Hall.
  • Burke, K. (1966). Language as symbolic action: Essays on life, literature, and method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. New York: Routledge.
  • Campbell, P. N. (1973). A rhetorical view of locutionary, illocutionary, and perlocutionary acts. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 59, 284–296.
  • Carey, J. (1988). Communication as culture: Essay on Media and society. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
  • Carlson, M. (2004). Performance: A critical introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
  • Clark, H. H., & Carlson, T. B. (1982). Hearers and speech acts. Language, 58(2), 332–373.
  • Cohen, T. (1973). Illocutions and perlocutions. Foundations of Language, 9, 492–503.
  • Conquergood, D. (1989). Poetics, play, process and power: The performative turn in anthropology. Text and Performance Quarterly, 9, 82–88.
  • Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2001). Teacher testing and the improvement of practice. Teaching Education, 12(1), 11–34.
  • Davis, B., & Sumara D. (2006). Complexity and education: Inquiries into learning, teaching, and research. New York: Routledge.
  • Davis, S. (1979). Perlocutions. Linguistics and Philosophy, 3(2), 225–243.
  • Dawe, H. A. (1984). Teaching: A performing art. Phi Delta Kappan, 65, 548–552.
  • Dunkin, M. J., & Biddle, B. J. (1974). The study of teaching. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Eidelson, R. J. (1997). Complex adaptive systems in the behavioral and social sciences. Review of General Psychology, 1(1), 42–71.
  • Eisenberg, J. A. (1992). The limits of reason. Toronto, ON: OISE Press.
  • Eisner, E. (1983). The art and craft of teaching. Educational Leadership, 40(4), 4–13.
  • Eisner, E. (1998). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Evans, R. (2007). Existing practice is not the template. Educational Researcher, 36(9), 553–559.
  • Felman, S. (1983). The scandal of the speaking body: Don Juan with J. L. Austin, or Seduction in two languages. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Floden, R. E., & Buchmann, M. (1993). Between routines and anarchy: Preparing teachers for uncertainty. Oxford Review of Education, 19(3), 373–382.
  • Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge (A. M. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Pantheon.
  • Gaines, R. S. (1979). Doing by saying: Toward a theory of perlocution. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 65, 207–217.
  • Garoian, C. R. (1999). Performing pedagogy: Toward an art of politics. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Vintage.
  • Giroux, H. A. (1999). Foreword to the first edition. In P. McLaren, Schooling as a ritual performance: Towards a political economy of educational symbols and gestures (3rd ed., pp. xxiii–xxvii). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Gu, Y. (1993). The impasse of perlocution. Journal of Pragmatics, 20(5), 405–432.
  • Helsing, D. (2007). Style of knowing regarding uncertainties. Curriculum Inquiry, 37(1), 33–70.
  • Horne, H. H. (1917). The teacher as artist: An essay in education as an aesthetic process. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Hornsby, J. (1994). Illocution and its significance. In S. L. Tsohadtzidis (Ed.), Foundations of speech act theory: Philosophical and linguistic perspectives (pp. 187–207). London: Routledge.
  • Howe, K. R. (2005). The education science question: A symposium. Educational Theory, 55(3), 235–243.
  • James, W. (1899). Psychology and the teaching art. In Talks to teachers on psychology; and to students on some of life's ideals. New York: Henry Holt. Retrieved April 1, 2012, from http://www.des.emory.edu/mfp/tt1.html
  • Juarrero, A. (2000). Dynamics in action: Intentional behaviour as a complex system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Kaestle, C. F. (1993). The awful reputation of education research. Educational Researcher, 22(1), 26–31.
  • Koerner, J. (1963). The miseducation of American teachers. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Kramer, R. (1991). Ed school follies: The miseducation of America's teachers. New York: Free Press.
  • Kurzon, D. (1998). The speech act status of incitement: Perlocutionary acts revisited. Journal of Pragmatics, 29, 571–596.
  • Labaree, D. F. (2004). The trouble with ed schools. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Lagemann, E. C. (1997). Contested terrain: A history of education research in the United States, 1980–1990. Educational Researcher, 26(9), 5–18.
  • Liew, W. M. (2012). Perform or else: The performative enhancement of teacher professionalism. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 32(3), 285–303.
  • Luke, A. (2011). Generalizing across borders: Policy and the limits of educational science. Educational Researcher, 40(8), 367–377.
  • Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Marcu, D. (2000). Perlocutions: The Achilles heel of speech act theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(12), 1719–1741.
  • McDermott, R., & Hall, K. (2007). Scientifically debased research on learning, 1854–2006. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 38(1), 9–15.
  • McDonald, J. P. (1992). Teaching: Making sense of an uncertain craft. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • McKenzie, J. (2001). Perform or else: From discipline to performance. New York: Routledge.
  • McLaren, P. (1999). Schooling as ritual performance: Towards a political economy of educational symbols and gestures (3rd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). New York: Macmillan.
  • Mitzel, H. E. (1960). Teacher effectiveness. In C. W. Harris (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (3rd ed., pp. 1481–1486). New York: Macmillan.
  • Ministry of Education. (n.d.). Education service work review form (teachers). Singapore: Author.
  • Munthe, E. (2003). Teachers' workplace and professional certainty. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(8), 801–813.
  • National Research Council, Committee on Scientific Principles in Education Research. (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Neuman, Y., & Bekerman, Z. (2000). Cultural resources and the gap between educational theory and practice. Teachers College Record, 103(3), 471–484.
  • Palmer, P. J. (1998). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher's life. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Phelan, P. (1993). Unmarked: The politics of performance. New York: Routledge.
  • Pineau, E. L. (1994). Teaching is performance: Reconceptualizing a problematic metaphor. American Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 3–25.
  • Pineau, E. L. (2002). Critical performative pedagogy. In N. Stuckey & C. Wimmer (Eds.), Teaching performance studies (pp. 41–54). Carbondale: Southern Illinois Press.
  • Prendergast, M. (2008). Teacher as performer: Unpacking a metaphor in performance theory and critical performative pedagogy. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 9(2). Retrieved September 9, 2012, from http://www.ijea.org
  • Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of chaos: Man's new dialogue with nature. New York: Bantam.
  • Roberts, J. R. (1968). The quest for a science of education in the nineteenth century. History of Education Quarterly, 8, 431–446.
  • Rorty, R. (2000). A world without substances or essences. In Philosophy and social hope (pp. 47–71). London: Penguin Books.
  • Rubin, L. (1985). Artistry in teaching. New York: Random House.
  • Sarason, S. B. (1999). Teaching as a performing art. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Schechner, R. (2006). Performance studies 2E: An introduction. New York: Routledge.
  • Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Schwandt, T. (2005). A diagnostic reading of scientifically based research for education. Educational Theory, 55(3), 285–305.
  • Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
  • Shulman, L. S. (2005). Pedagogies of uncertainty. Liberal Education, 91(2), 18–25.
  • Spizzica, M. (1997). Cultural differences within “Western” and “Eastern” education. In Z. Golebiowski & H. Borland (Eds.), Academic communication across disciplines and cultures (pp. 248–257). Melbourne, Australia: Victoria University of Technology.
  • St. Clair, R. (2005). Similarity and superunknowns: An essay on the challenges of educational research. Harvard Educational Review, 75(4), 435–453.
  • Stern, C. S., & Henderson, B. (1993). Performance: Texts and contexts. New York: Longman.
  • Strawson, P. F. (1964). Intention and convention in speech acts. The Philosophical Review, 73(4), 439–460.
  • The Teaching Commission. (2006). Teaching at risk: Progress and potholes. New York: Author.
  • Thorndike, E. L. (1910). The contribution of psychology to education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1, 5–12.
  • United States Department of Education. (2010a, December 6). No Child Left Behind Act of 2002. Retrieved October 15, 2012, from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/index.html
  • United States Department of Education. (2010b). What Works Clearinghouse. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved February 22, 2010, from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/
  • van Manen, M. (1982). Edifying theory: Serving the good. Theory Into Practice, 21(1), 44–49.
  • Walters, P. B. (2009). The politics of science: Battles for scientific authority in the field of education research. In P. B. Walters, A. Lareau, & S. H. Ranis (Eds.), Education research on trial: Policy reform and the call for scientific rigor (pp. 17–50). New York: Routledge.
  • Wong, J. K.-K. (2004). Are the learning styles of Asian international students culturally or contextually based? International Education Journal, 4(4), 154–165.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.