References
- Chang WJ, Tse DT, Rosa RH, Huang A, Johnson TE, Schiffman J. Conjunctival cytology features of giant papillary conjunctivitis associated with ocular prostheses. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 21: 39–45.
- Kim JH, Lee MJ, Choung HK, Kim NJ, Hwang S, Sung MS, Khwarg SI. Conjunctival cytologic features in anophthalmic patients wearing an ocular prosthesis. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 24: 290–295.
- Saini, JS, Rajwanshi A, Dhar S. Clinicopathological correlation of hard contact lens related changes in tarsal conjunctiva by impression cytology. Acta Ophthalmol 1990; 68: 65–70.
- Bailey IL, Bullimore MA, Raasch TW, Taylor, HR. Clinical grading and the effects of scaling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991; 32: 422–432.
- Chong E, Simpson T, Fonn D. The repeatability of discrete and continuous anterior segment grading scales. Optom Vis Sci 2000; 77: 244–251.
- Pine KR, Sloan B, Jacobs RJ. The development of measurement tools for prosthetic eye research. Clin Exp Optom 2013; 96: 32–38
- Espinosa GM, Israel H, Holds JB. Survey of oculoplastic surgeons regarding clinical use of tear production tests. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 25: 197–200.
- Zone‐Quick™ Phenol red thread—FCI‐Ophthalmics. Available from: www.fci‐ophthalmics.com/files/pdf/zone_quick_web.pdf [Accessed August 2012].
- Lin L. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 1989: 45: 255–268.
- New Zealand Government. Defining urban and rural New Zealand. Available from: http://www.stats.govt.nz/browse_for_stats/people_and_communities/Geographic‐areas/urban‐rural‐profile‐update.aspx. [Accessed August 2012].
- RPS Inflammadry Detector™. Available from: www.Intl.rpsdetectors.com/products/inflammadry. [Accessed March 2012].
- Allansmith MR, Korb DR, Greiner JV, Henriquez AS, Simon MA, Finnemore VM. Giant papillary conjunctivitis in contact lens wearers. Am J Ophthalmol 1977; 83: 697–708.
- Ho CH, Hlady V. Fluorescence assay for measuring lipid deposits on contact lens surfaces. Biomaterials 1995; 16: 479–482.
- Teichroeb JH, Forrest JA, Ngai V, Martin JW, Jones L, Medley J. Imaging protein deposits on contact lens materials. Optom Vis Sci 2008; 85: 1151–1164.
- Sack RA, Sathe S, Hackworth LA, Wilcox MD, Holden BA, Morris CA. The effect of eye closure on protein and complement deposition on Group IV hydrogel contact lenses: relationship to tear flow dynamics. Curr Eye Res 1996; 15: 1092–1100.
- Mcmonnies C, Lowe R. After‐care. In: Phillips AJ, Speedwell L, eds. Contact Lenses. 5th ed. Edinburgh: Butterworth Heinemann Elsevier, 2007. p 388–389.
- Pine KR, Sloan B, Stewart J, Jacobs RJ. Concerns of anophthalmic patients wearing artificial eyes. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2011; 39: 47–52.
- Pine KR, Sloan B, Stewart J, Jacobs RJ. A survey of prosthetic eye wearers to investigate mucoid discharge. Clin Ophthalmol 2012; 6: 707–713.
- Osborn L, Hettler D. A survey of recommendations on the care of ocular prostheses. Optometry 2010; 81: 142–145.
- Srinivasan, BD, Jakobiec FA, Iwamoto T, Devoe AG. Giant papillary conjunctivitis with ocular prostheses. Arch Ophthalmol 1979; 97: 892–895.
- Bozkurt B, Akyurek N, Irkec M, Erdener U, Memis L. Immunohistochemical findings in prosthesis‐associated giant papillary conjunctivitis. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2007; 35: 535–540.
- Fowler SA, Allansmith MR. Evolution of soft contact lens coatings. Arch Ophthalmol 1980; 98: 95–99.