Review of guidelines for children’s vision screenings

References

• Marshall EC, Meetz RE, Harmon LL. Through our children's eyes ‐ the public health impact of the vision screening requirements for Indiana school children. Optometry 2010; 81: 71–82.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings GE. Vision screening in junior schools. Public Health 1996; 110: 369–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tengtrisorn S, Sangsupawanitch P, Chansawang RN. Cost effectiveness analysis of a visual screening program for primary school children in Thailand. J Med Assoc Thai 2009; 92: 1050–1056.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ethan D, Basch CE. Promoting healthy vision in students: progress and challenges in policy, programs, and research. J Sch Health 2008; 78: 411–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart‐brown S, Haslum MN. Screening of vision in school: could we do better by doing less? BMJ 1988; 30: 217–223.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson WD, Evans BJW. A new approach to vision screening in schools. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1999; 19: 196–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberklaid F, Wake M, Harris C. Child health screening and surveillance: a critical review of the evidence. Melbourne: National Health and Medical Research Council, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Stifter E, Burggasser G, Hirmann E, Thaler A, Radner W. Evaluating reading acuity and speed in children with microstrabismic amblyopia using a standardized reading chart system. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2005; 243: 1228–1235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed MJ, Kraft SP, Buncic R. Parents' observations of the academic and nonacademic performance of children with strabismus. J Vis Impair Blind 2004; 5: 276–288.
   Google Scholar
• Rosner J, Rosner J. The relationship between moderate hyperopia and academic achievement: how much plus is enough? J Am Optom Assoc 1997; 68: 648–650.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Godts D, Smeets L, Evens P, Tassignon MJ. The incidence of visual dysfunction in children with reading difficulties. IXth International Orthoptic Congress, 1999, Stockholm, Sweden. Nurnberg: Berufsverband Orthoptistinnen Deutschlands Ev, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Krumholtz I. Results from a pediatric vision screening and its ability to predict academic performance. Optometry 2000; 71: 426–430.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morcos A, Wright M. National Children's Vision Project: Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Palomo‐alvarez C, Puell MC. Accommodative function in school children with reading difficulties. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2008; 246: 1769–1774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams C, Northstone K, Harrad RA, Sparrow JM, Harvey I. Amblyopia treatment outcomes after preschool screening v school entry screening: observational data from a prospective cohort study. Br J Ophthalmol 2003; 87: 988–993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. A randomised trial of atropine vs. patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120: 268–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson TH, Andrews R, Dutton G. Assessment of an inner city visual screening programme for preschool children. Br J Ophthalmol 1995; 79: 1068–1073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall D, Stewart‐brown S. Screening in child health. Br Med Bull 1998; 54: 929–943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blum HB, Peters HL, Betman JW, Johnson F, Fellows Jr V. The Orinda vision study. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1959; 36: 455–469.
   Google Scholar
• Blum HL, Peters HB, Bettman JW, Fellows Jr V, Johnson F. Design and evaluation of a vision screening program for elementary school children. Am J Pub Health 1959; 49: 1670–1681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman DG, Bland JM. Diagnostic tests 2: predictive values. BMJ 1994; 309: 102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey RN. Assessing the predictive ability of the test‐positive findings of an elementary school vision screening. Optom Vis Sci 1998; 75: 682–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paech M. The Orinda Study: should the ‘Modified Clinical Technique’ retain its ‘gold standard’ status as a vision screening tool? Clin Exp Optom 2010; 93: 31–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice GR. Vision screening for elementary schools: the Orinda Study. Am J Pub Health Nation's Health 1959; 49: 1716–1717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh‐tootle WL, Corliss DA, Alvarez SL, Clore KA, Daum KM, Gordon A, Houston G et al. A statistical analysis of Modified Clinical Technique vision screening of preschoolers by optometry students. Optom Vis Sci 1994; 71: 593–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer PS. The Portsea Lord Mayor's children's camp vision screening: a rationale and protocol for optometric screening. Aust J Optom 1983; 66: 178–185.
   Google Scholar
• Walters J. Portsea Modified Clinical Technique: results from an expanded optometric screening protocol for children. Aust J Optom 1984; 67: 176–186.
   Google Scholar
• Amigo G, Mccarthy A, Pye D. Visual characteristics of an underprivileged group of Australian children. Aust J Optom 1976; 59: 188–197.
   Google Scholar
• Bodack MI, Chung I, Krumholtz I. An analysis of vision screening data from New York City public schools. Optometry 2010; 81: 476–484.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman S, Cohen AH, Stolzberg M, Ritty JM. Validation study of the New York State Optometric Association (NYSOA) vision screening battery. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1985; 62: 165–168.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen AH, Lieberman S, Stolzberg M, Ritty JM. The NYSOA vision screening battery—a total approach. J Am Optom Assoc 1983; 54: 979–984.
   Google Scholar
• Gallaway M, Mitchell GL. Validity of the VERA visual skills screening. Optometry 2010; 81: 571–579.
   Google Scholar
• Kulp MT, Vision in Preschoolers (VIP) Study Group. Findings from the Vision in Preschoolers (VIP) study. Optom Vis Sci 2009; 86: 619–623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vision in Preschoolers (VIP) Study Group. Comparison of preschool vision screening tests as administered by licensed eye care professionals in the Vision in Preschoolers study. Ophthalmology 2004; 111: 637–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funarunart P, Tengtrisorn S, Sangsupawanitch P, Siangyai P. Accuracy of non‐cycloplegic refraction in primary school children in Southern Thailand. J Med Assoc Thai 2009; 92: 806–812.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jorge J, Queiros A, Almeida JB, Parafita MA. Retinoscopy/Autorefraction: Which is the best starting point for a noncycloplegic refraction? Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 64–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. Healthy Kids Check—Fact Sheet. 2012 (updated 2012). Available at: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/Health_Kids_Check_Factsheet. [Accessed: July, 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. Healthy Kids Check ‐ Checklist. 2012 (updated 2012). Available at: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/Healthy_Kids_Check%E2%80%93Checklist. Accessed: July, 2012];
   Google Scholar
• Royal Flying Doctor Service. Health services for children.; 2010 [updated 2010]. Available at: http://www.flyingdoctor.org.au/News–Events/News/?ItemID=117&count=1. [Accessed January, 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Royal Institute for Deaf and Blind Children. Maxine McKew visits RIDBC.; 2010 [updated 2010. Available at: www.ridbc.org.au. [Accessed January, 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Kimel LS. Lack of follow‐up exams after failed school vision screenings: an investigation of contributing factors. J Sch Nurs 2006; 22: 156–162.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zaba JN, Reynolds W, Mozlin R, Costich J, Slavova S, Steele GT. Comparing the effectiveness of vision screenings as part of the school entrance physical examination to comprehensive vision examinations in children ages 3 to 6: an exploratory study. Optometry 2007; 78: 514–522.
   Google Scholar
• Zaba JN, Johnson R, Reynolds W. Vision examinations for all children entering public school: the new Kentucky law. Optometry 2003; 74: 149–158.
   Google Scholar
• Logan NS, Gilmartin B. School vision screening, ages 5–16 years: the evidence‐base for content, provision and efficacy. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2004; 24: 481–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moseley MJ. Preschool vision screening: a recent report calls for a halt. Br J Ophthalmol 1998; 82: 722–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvarnstrom G, Jakobson P, Lennerstrand G. Visual screening of Swedish children: an ophthalmological evaluation. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2001; 79: 240–244.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hard A‐L. Results of vision screening of 6‐year‐olds at school: a population‐based study with emphasis on screening limits. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2007; 85: 415–418.
   Google Scholar
• Anstice N, Spink J, Abdul‐rahman A. Review of preschool vision screening referrals in South Auckland, New Zealand. Clin Exp Optom 2012; 95: 442–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramke J, Du toit R, Roberts B, Pereira S, Hobday K. Vision screening of children attending primary school in rural Timor‐Leste. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2011; 39: 377–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar