Laser in situ keratomileusis in 2012: a review

References

• Pallikaris IG, Papatzanaki ME, Siganos DS, Tsilimbaris MK. A corneal flap technique for laser in situ keratomileusis. Human studies. Arch Ophthalmol 1991; 109: 1699–1702.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yuen LH, Chan WK, Koh J, Mehta JS, Tan DT. SingLasik Research Group. A 10‐year prospective audit of LASIK outcomes for myopia in 37,932 eyes at a single institution in Asia. Ophthalmology 2010; 117: 1236–1244 e1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schallhorn SC, Venter JA. One‐month outcomes of wavefront‐guided LASIK for low to moderate myopia with the VISX STAR S4 laser in 32,569 eyes. J Refract Surg 2009; 25: S634–S641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kato N, Toda I, Hori‐komai Y, Sakai C, Tsubota K. Five‐year outcome of LASIK for myopia. Ophthalmology 2008; 115: 839–844 e2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alió JL, Muftuoglu O, Ortiz D, Pérez‐santonja JJ, Artola A, Ayala MJ, Garcia MJ et al. Ten‐year follow‐up of laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia. Am J Ophthalmol 2008; 145: 55–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey MD, Zadnik K. Outcomes of LASIK for myopia with FDA‐approved lasers. Cornea 2007; 26: 246–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon KD, Fernández de castro LE, Sandoval HP, Biber JM, Groat B, Neff KD, Ying MS et al. LASIK world literature review: quality of life and patient satisfaction. Ophthalmology 2009; 116: 691–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randleman JB, Shah RD. LASIK interface complications: etiology, management, and outcomes. J Refract Surg 2012; 28: 575–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry CR, Canto AP, Galor A, Vaddavalli PK, Culbertson WW, Yoo SH. Epithelial ingrowth after LASIK: clinical characteristics, risk factors, and visual outcomes in patients requiring flap lift. J Refract Surg 2012; 28: 488–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Paula FH, Khairallah CG, Niziol LM, Musch DC, Shtein RM. Diffuse lamellar keratitis after laser in situ keratomileusis with femtosecond laser flap creation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012; 38: 1014–1019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golas L, Manche EE. Dry eye after laser in situ keratomileusis with femtosecond laser and mechanical keratome. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37: 1476–1480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein SR, Epstein RJ, Randleman JB, Stulting RD. Corneal ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis in patients without apparent preoperative risk factors. Cornea 2006; 25: 388–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gritz DC. LASIK interface keratitis: epidemiology, diagnosis and care. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2011; 22: 251–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton GL, Kim P. Laser in situ keratomileusis in 2010—a review. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2010; 38: 192–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schallhorn SC, Amesbury EC, Tanzer DJ. Avoidance, recognition, and management of LASIK complications. Am J Ophthalmol 2006; 141: 733–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feltham MH, Wong R, Wolfe R, Stapleton F. Variables affecting refractive outcome following LASIK for myopia. Eye (Lond) 2008; 22: 1117–1123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazon de la jara P, Erickson D, Erickson P, Stapleton F. Visual and non‐visual factors associated with patient satisfaction and quality of life in LASIK. Eye (Lond) 2011; 25: 1194–1201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu K, Mckee HD, Jhanji V. Changing perspective of reasons for not performing laser‐assisted in situ keratomileusis among candidates in a university eye clinic. Clin Exp Optom 2013; 96: 20–24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamashmus M, Saleh MF, Abdulrahman M, Al‐kershy N. Reasons for not performing LASIK in refractive surgery candidates in Yemen. Eur J Ophthalmol 2010; 20: 858–864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma N, Singhvi A, Sinha R, Vajpayee RB. Reasons for not performing LASIK in refractive surgery candidates. J Refract Surg 2005; 21: 496–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosman M, Alió JL, Ortiz D, Perez‐santonja JJ. Refractive stability of LASIK with the Visx 20/20 excimer laser vs ZB5m phakic IOL implantation in patients with high myopia (>‐10.00 D): a 10‐year retrospective study. J Refract Surg 2011; 27: 279–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alió J, Galal A, Ayala MJ, Artola A. Hyperopic LASIK with Esiris/Schwind technology. J Refract Surg 2006; 22: 772–781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbelaez MC, Vidal C, Arba‐mosquera S. Excimer laser correction of moderate to high astigmatism with a non‐wavefront‐guided aberration‐free ablation profile: Six‐month results. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009; 35: 1789–1798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugar A, Rapuano CJ, Culbertson WW, Huang D, Varley GA, Agapitos PJ, de Luise VP et al. Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and astigmatism: safety and efficacy: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2002; 109: 175–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo IC. Trends in refractive surgery at an academic center: 2007–2009. BMC Ophthalmol 2011; 14; 11: 11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmack I, Auffarth GU, Epstein D, Holzer MP. Refractive surgery trends and practice style changes in Germany over a 3‐year period. J Refract Surg 2010; 26: 202–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobo‐soriano R, Beltran J, Baviera J. LASIK outcomes in patients with underlying systemic contraindications: a preliminary study. Ophthalmology 2006; 113: 1118 e1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Rojas silva V, Rodríguez‐conde R, Cobo‐soriano R, Beltrán J, Llovet F, Baviera J. Laser in situ keratomileusis in patients with a history of ocular herpes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33: 1855–1859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadpour M. LASIK and systemic contraindications. Ophthalmology 2007; 114: 1032–1033; author reply 1033–1034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadpour M. Excimer laser refractive surgery in patients with underlying autoimmune diseases. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33: 175; author reply 176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arevalo JF. Posterior segment complications after laser‐assisted in situ keratomileusis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2008; 19: 177–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder PS. Risk factors for ectasia after LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34: 2010–2011.
   Google Scholar
• Seiler T, Koufala K, Richter G. Iatrogenic keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg 1998; 14: 312–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randleman JB, Russell B, Ward MA, Thompson KP, Stulting RD. Risk factors and prognosis for corneal ectasia after LASIK. Ophthalmology 2003; 110: 267–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randleman JB, Woodward M, Lynn MJ, Stulting RD. Risk assessment for ectasia after corneal refractive surgery. Ophthalmology 2008; 115: 37–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al‐farhan HM, Al‐otaibi WM. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound pachymetry, ultrasound biomicroscopy, and the Artemis‐2 VHF scanner in normal eyes. Clin Ophthalmol 2012; 6: 1037–1043.
   Google Scholar
• Guilbert E, Saad A, Grise‐dulac A, Gatinel D. Corneal thickness, curvature, and elevation readings in normal corneas: combined Placido‐Scheimpflug system versus combined Placido‐scanning‐slit system. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012; 38: 1198–1206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probst L. LASIK: Advances, Controversies and Customs. Thorofare, New Jersey: Slack Incorporated, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Twa MD, Nichols JJ, Joslin CE, Kollbaum PS, Edrington TB, Bullimore MA, Mitchell GL et al. Characteristics of corneal ectasia after LASIK for myopia. Cornea 2004; 23: 447–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alió JL, Piñero PD, Alesón A, Teus MA, Barraquer RI, Murta J, Maldonado MJ et al. Keratoconus‐integrated characterization considering anterior corneal aberrations, internal astigmatism, and corneal biomechanics. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37: 552–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saad A, Gatinel D. Topographic and tomographic properties of forme fruste keratoconus corneas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 5546–5555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozobolis V, Sideroudi H, Giarmoukakis A, Gkika M, Labiris G. Corneal biomechanical properties and anterior segment parameters in forme fruste keratoconus. Eur J Ophthalmol 2012; 22: 920–930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson RD, Nguyen MT, Lee N, Hamilton DR. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, forme fruste keratoconus, and manifest keratoconus after statistical correction for potentially confounding factors. Cornea 2011; 30: 516–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweitzer C, Roberts CJ, Mahmoud AM, Colin J, Maurice‐tison S, Kerautret J. Screening of forme fruste keratoconus with the ocular response analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 2403–2410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirwan C, O'malley D, O'keefe M. Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in keratoectasia: findings using the Reichert ocular response analyzer. Ophthalmologica 2008; 222: 334–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kymionis GD, Kontadakis GA, Kounis GA, Portaliou DM, Karavitaki AE, Magarakis M, Yoo S et al. Simultaneous topography‐guided PRK followed by corneal collagen cross‐linking for keratoconus. J Refract Surg 2009; 25: S807–S811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanellopoulos AJ. Comparison of sequential vs same‐day simultaneous collagen cross‐linking and topography‐guided PRK for treatment of keratoconus. J Refract Surg 2009; 25: S812–818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger RR, Kanellopoulos AJ. Stability of simultaneous topography‐guided photorefractive keratectomy and riboflavin/UVA cross‐linking for progressive keratoconus: case reports. J Refract Surg 2010; 26: S827–S832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labiris G, Giarmoukakis A, Sideroudi H, Gkika M, Fanariotis M, Kozobolis V. Impact of keratoconus, cross‐linking and cross‐linking combined with photorefractive keratectomy on self‐reported quality of life. Cornea 2012; 31: 734–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuwairqi WS, Sinjab MM. Safety and efficacy of simultaneous corneal collagen cross‐linking with topography‐guided PRK in managing low‐grade keratoconus: 1‐year follow‐up. J Refract Surg 2012; 28: 341–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith RJ, Maloney RK. Laser in situ keratomileusis in patients with autoimmune diseases. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32: 1292–1295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carp GI, Verhamme T, Gobbe M, Ayliffe WH, Reinstein DZ. Surgically induced corneal necrotizing keratitis following LASIK in a patient with inflammatory bowel disease. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36: 1786–1789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De paiva CS, Chen Z, Koch DD, Hamill MB, Manuel FK, Hassan SS, Wilhelmus KR et al. The incidence and risk factors for developing dry eye after myopic LASIK. Am J Ophthalmol 2006; 141: 438–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albietz JM, Lenton LM, Mclennan SG. Dry eye after LASIK: comparison of outcomes for Asian and Caucasian eyes. Clin Exp Optom 2005; 88: 89–96.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liang L, Zhang M, Zou W, Liu Z. Aggravated dry eye after laser in situ keratomileusis in patients with Sjögren syndrome. Cornea 2008; 27: 120–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam PM, Young AL, Lam PT. Sjogren syndrome and dry eye: the impact of corneal refractive surgery. Cornea 2010; 29: 1072; author reply 1073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadi SF, Tahvildari M, Abdolahi‐nia T. Pupil size and LASIK. Ophthalmology 2012; 119: 883–884; author reply 884–885.
   Google Scholar
• Holladay JT, Janes JA. Topographic changes in corneal asphericity and effective optical zone after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; 28: 942–947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pop M, Payette Y. Risk factors for night vision complaints after LASIK for myopia. Ophthalmology 2004; 111: 3–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan A, Manche EE. Effect of preoperative pupil size on quality of vision after wavefront‐guided LASIK. Ophthalmology 2011; 118: 736–741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benito A, Redondo M, Artal P. Temporal evolution of ocular aberrations following laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2011; 31: 421–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcalinden C, Moore JE. The change in internal aberrations following myopic corneal laser refractive surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2011; 249: 775–781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstone RN, Yildiz EH, Fan VC, Asbell PA. Changes in higher order wavefront aberrations after contact lens corneal refractive therapy and LASIK surgery. J Refract Surg 2010; 26: 348–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schallhorn SC, Farjo AA, Huang D, Boxer wachler BS, Trattler WB, Tanzer DJ, Majmudar PA et al. Wavefront‐guided LASIK for the correction of primary myopia and astigmatism a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2008; 115: 1249–1261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schallhorn SC, Tanzer DJ, Kaupp SE, Brown M, Malady SE. Comparison of night driving performance after wavefront‐guided and conventional LASIK for moderate myopia. Ophthalmology 2009; 116: 702–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vetter JM, Schirra A, Garcia‐bardon D, Lorenz K, Weingärtner WE, Sekundo W. Comparison of intraocular pressure during corneal flap preparation between a femtosecond laser and a mechanical microkeratome in porcine eyes. Cornea 2011; 30: 1150–1154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway ML, Wevill M, Benavente‐perez A, Hosking SL. Ocular blood‐flow hemodynamics before and after application of a laser in situ keratomileusis ring. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36: 268–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dementyev DD, Kourenkov VV, Rodin AS, Fadeykina TL, Diaz martines TE. Retinal nerve fiber layer changes after LASIK evaluated with optical coherence tomography. J Refract Surg 2005; 21: S623–S627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozdamar A, Küçüksümer Y, Aras C, Akova N, Ustundag C. Visual field changes after laser in situ keratomileusis in myopic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30: 1020–1023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan KC, Poostchi A, Wong T, Insull EA, Sachdev N, Wells AP. Visual field changes after transient elevation of intraocular pressure in eyes with and without glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2008; 115: 667–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bashford KP, Shafranov G, Tauber S, Shields MB. Considerations of glaucoma in patients undergoing corneal refractive surgery. Surv Ophthalmol 2005; 50: 245–251.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai AS, Loon SC. Intraocular pressure assessment after laser in situ keratomileusis: a review. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2012; 40: 295–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson BA, Rapuano CJ, Cohen EJ, Hammersmith KM, Ayres BD, Laibson PR. Referrals to the Wills Eye Institute Cornea Service after laser in situ keratomileusis: reasons for patient dissatisfaction. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34: 32–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin GJ, Merkley KH. Retreatment after wavefront‐guided and standard myopic LASIK. Ophthalmology 2006; 113: 1623–1628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bragheeth MA, Fares U, Dua HS. Re‐treatment after laser in situ keratomileusis for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. Br J Ophthalmol 2008; 92: 1506–1510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domniz Y, Comaish IF, Lawless MA, Rogers CM, Sutton GL. Recutting the cornea versus lifting the flap: comparison of two enhancement techniques following laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg 2001; 17: 505–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu A, Manche EE. Visually significant haze after retreatment with photorefractive keratectomy with mitomycin‐C following laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36: 1599–1601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neira‐zalentein W, Moilanen JA, Tuisku IS, Holopainen JM, Tervo TM. Photorefractive keratectomy retreatment after LASIK. J Refract Surg 2008; 24: 710–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcalinden C, Moore JE. Retreatment of residual refractive errors with flap lift laser in situ keratomileusis. Eur J Ophthalmol 2011; 21: 5–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan CC, Boxer wachler BS. Comparison of the effects of LASIK retreatment techniques on epithelial ingrowth rates. Ophthalmology 2007; 114: 640–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim P, Briganti EM, Sutton GL, Lawless MA, Rogers CM, Hodge C. Laser in situ keratomileusis for refractive error after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31: 979–986.
   Google Scholar
• Macsai MS, Fontes BM. Refractive enhancement following presbyopia‐correcting intraocular lens implantation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2008; 19: 18–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfonso JF, Fernández‐vega L, Montés‐micó R, Valcárcel B. Femtosecond laser for residual refractive error correction after refractive lens exchange with multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Am J Ophthalmol 2008; 146: 244–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piñero DR, Ayala espinosa MJ, Alió JL. LASIK outcomes following multifocal and monofocal intraocular lens implantation. J Refract Surg 2010; 26: 569–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge C, Sutton G, Lawless M, Rogers C. Photorefractive keratectomy with mitomycin‐C after corneal transplantation for keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37: 1884–1894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost NA, Wu J, Lai TF, Coster DJ. A review of randomized controlled trials of penetrating keratoplasty techniques. Ophthalmology 2006; 113: 942–949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams KA, Lowe MT, Keane MC, Jones VJ, Loh RS, Coster DJ. The Australian Corneal Graft Registry 2012 Report. Adelaide: Snap Printing, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Geerards AJ, Vreugdenhil W, Khazen A. Incidence of rigid gas‐permeable contact lens wear after keratoplasty for keratoconus. Eye Contact Lens 2006; 32: 207–210.
   Google Scholar
• Kuryan J, Channa P. Refractive surgery after corneal transplant. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2010; 24: 259–264.
   Google Scholar
• Bahar I, Kaiserman I, Mashor RS, Mcallum P, Slomovic A, Rootman D. Femtosecond LASIK combined with astigmatic keratotomy for the correction of refractive errors after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2010; 41: 242–249.
   Google Scholar
• Webber SK, Lawless MA, Sutton GL, Rogers CM. LASIK for post penetrating keratoplasty astigmatism and myopia. Br J Ophthalmol 1999; 83: 1013–1018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardten DR, Chittcharus A, Lindstrom RL. Long term analysis of LASIK for the correction of refractive errors after penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea 2004; 23: 479–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barreto J Jr, Netto MV, Reis A, Nakano M, Alves MR, Bechara SJ. Topography‐guided (NIDEK customized aspheric treatment zone) photorefractive keratectomy with mitomycin C after penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: case report. J Refract Surg 2009; 25: S131–S135.
   Google Scholar
• Fecarotta CM, Kim M, Wasserman BN. Refractive surgery in children. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2010; 21: 350–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alió JL, Wolter NV, Piñero DP, Amparo F, Sari ES, Cankaya C, Laria C. Pediatric refractive surgery and its role in the treatment of amblyopia: meta‐analysis of the peer‐reviewed literature. J Refract Surg 2011; 27: 364–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tychsen L. Refractive surgery for children: excimer laser, phakic intraocular lens, and clear lens extraction. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2008; 19: 342–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montés‐micó R, Rodriguez‐galietero A, Alió JL. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome LASIK for myopia. Ophthalmology 2007; 114: 62–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kezirian GM, Stonecipher KG. Comparison of the IntraLase femtosecond laser and mechanical keratomes for laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30: 804–811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton G, Hodge C. Accuracy and precision of LASIK flap thickness using the IntraLase femtosecond laser in 1000 consecutive cases. J Refract Surg 2008; 24: 802–806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stonecipher K, Ignacio TS, Stonecipher M. Advances in refractive surgery: microkeratome and femtosecond laser flap creation in relation to safety, efficacy, predictability, and biomechanical stability. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2006; 17: 368–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorz MC, Vossmerbaeumer U. Comparison of flap adhesion strength using the Amadeus microkeratome and the IntraLase iFS femtosecond laser in rabbits. J Refract Surg 2008; 24: 875–878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JY, Kim MJ, Kim TI, Choi HJ, Pak JH, Tchah H. A femtosecond laser creates a stronger flap than a mechanical microkeratome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 599–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomao MQ, Ambrosio R Jr, Wilson SE. Dry eye associated with laser in situ keratomileusis: Mechanical microkeratome versus femtosecond laser. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009; 35: 1756–1760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzzonetti L, Petrocelli G, Valente P, Tamburrelli C, Mosca L, Laborante A, Balestrazzi E. Comparison of corneal aberration changes after laser in situ keratomileusis performed with mechanical microkeratome and IntraLase femtosecond laser: 1‐year follow‐up. Cornea 2008; 27: 174–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder PS. One thousand consecutive IntraLase laser in situ keratomileusis flaps. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32: 962–969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder PS. Flap dimensions created with the IntraLase FS laser. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30: 26–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Netto MV, Mohan RR, Medeiros FW, Dupps WJ Jr, Sinha S, Krueger RR, Stapleton WM et al. Femtosecond laser and microkeratome corneal flaps: comparison of stromal wound healing and inflammation. J Refract Surg 2007; 23: 667–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Medeiros FW, Kaur H, Agrawal V, Chaurasia SS, Hammel J, Dupps WJ Jr, Wilson SE. Effect of femtosecond laser energy level on corneal stromal cell death and inflammation. J Refract Surg 2009; 25: 869–874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinciguerra P, Azzolini M, Airaghi P, Radice P, De molfetta V. Effect of decreasing surface and interface irregularities after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis on optical and functional outcomes. J Refract Surg 1998; 14: S199–S203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros FW, Stapleton WM, Hammel J, Krueger RR, Netto MV, Wilson SE. Wavefront analysis comparison of LASIK outcomes with the femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratomes. J Refract Surg 2007; 23: 880–887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S, Feng Y, Stojanovic A, Jankov MR 2nd, Wang Q. IntraLase femtosecond laser vs mechanical microkeratomes in LASIK for myopia: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Refract Surg 2012; 28: 15–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang ZH, Jin HY, Suo Y, Patel SV, Montés‐micó R, Manche EE, Xu X. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: Metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37: 2151–2159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs JM, Taravella MJ. Incidence of intraoperative flap complications in laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; 28: 23–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorz MC. Flap and interface complications in LASIK. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2002; 13: 242–245.
   Google Scholar
• Haft P, Yoo SH, Kymionis GD, Ide T, O'brien TP, Culbertson WW. Complications of LASIK flaps made by the IntraLase 15‐ and 30‐kHz femtosecond lasers. J Refract Surg 2009; 25: 979–984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toda I. LASIK and the ocular surface. Cornea 2008; 27: S70‐S76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dastgheib KA, Clinch TE, Manche EE, Hersh P, Ramsey J. Sloughing of corneal epithelium and wound healing complications associated with laser in situ keratomileusis in patients with epithelial basement membrane dystrophy. Am J Ophthalmol 2000; 130: 297–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith RJ, Maloney RK. Diffuse lamellar keratitis. A new syndrome in lamellar refractive surgery. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 1721–1726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tourtas T, Kopsachilis N, Meiller R, Kruse FE, Cursiefen C. Pressure‐induced interlamellar stromal keratitis after laser in situ keratomileusis. Cornea 2011; 30: 920–923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang MY, Maloney RK. Epithelial ingrowth after laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol 2000; 129: 746–751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker MB, Wilson SE. Incidence and prevention of epithelial growth within the interface after laser in situ keratomileusis. Cornea 2000; 19: 170–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun L, Liu G, Ren Y, Li J, Hao J, Liu X, Zhang Y. Efficacy and safety of LASIK in 10,052 eyes of 5081 myopic Chinese patients. J Refract Surg 2005; 21: S633–635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed TA, Hoffman RS, Fine IH, Packer M. Post‐laser assisted in situ keratomileusis epithelial ingrowth and its relation to pretreatment refractive error. Cornea 2011; 30: 550–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letko E, Price MO, Price FW Jr. Influence of original flap creation method on incidence of epithelial ingrowth after LASIK retreatment. J Refract Surg 2009; 25: 1039–1041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamburoglu G, Ertan A. Epithelial ingrowth after femtosecond laser‐assisted in situ keratomileusis. Cornea 2008; 27: 1122–1125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber SK, Lawless MA, Sutton GL, Rogers CM. Staphylococcal infection under a LASIK flap. Cornea 1999; 18: 361–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang MA, Jain S, Azar DT. Infections following laser in situ keratomileusis: an integration of the published literature. Surv Ophthalmol 2004; 49: 269–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma DP, Sharma S, Wilkins MR. Microbial keratitis after corneal laser refractive surgery. Future Microbiol 2011; 6: 819–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nettune GR, Pflugfelder SC. Post‐LASIK tear dysfunction and dysesthesia. Ocul Surf 2010; 8: 135–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shtein RM. Post‐LASIK dry eye. Expert Rev Ophthalmol 2011; 6: 575–582.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yu EY, Leung A, Rao S, Lam DS. Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis on tear stability. Ophthalmology 2000; 107: 2131–2135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrosio R Jr, Tervo T, Wilson SE. LASIK‐associated dry eye and neurotrophic epitheliopathy: pathophysiology and strategies for prevention and treatment. J Refract Surg 2008; 24: 396–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toda I, Asano‐kato N, Komai‐hori Y, Tsubota K. Dry eye after laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol 2001; 132: 1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnenfeld ED, Ehrenhaus M, Solomon R, Mazurek J, Rozell JC, Perry HD. Effect of hinge width on corneal sensation and dry eye after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30: 790–797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng YF, Yu JG, Wang DD, Li JH, Huang JH, Shi JL, Ye T et al The effect of hinge location on corneal sensation and dry eye after LASIK: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2013; 251: 357–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki M, Massingale ML, Ye F, Godbold J, Elfassy T, Vallabhajosyula M, Asbell PA. Tear osmolarity as a biomarker for dry eye disease severity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 4557–4561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konomi K, Chen LL, Tarko RS, Scally A, Schaumberg DA, Azar D, Dartt DA. Preoperative characteristics and a potential mechanism of chronic dry eye after LASIK. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49: 168–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry HD, Donnenfeld ED. Dry eye diagnosis and management in 2004. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2004; 15: 299–304.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lemp MA. Advances in understanding and managing dry eye disease. Am J Ophthalmol 2008; 146: 350–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ursea R, Purcell TL, Tan BU, Nalgirkar A, Lovaton ME, Ehrenhaus MR, Schanzlin DJ. The effect of cyclosporine A (Restasis) on recovery of visual acuity following LASIK. J Refract Surg 2008; 24: 473–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noda‐tsuruya T, Asano‐kato N, Toda I, Tsubota K. Autologous serum eye drops for dry eye after LASIK. J Refract Surg 2006; 22: 61–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murakami Y, Manche EE. Prospective, randomized comparison of self‐reported postoperative dry eye and visual fluctuation in LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmology 2012; 119: 2220–2224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dooley I, D'arcy F, O'keefe M. Comparison of dry‐eye disease severity after laser in situ keratomileusis and laser‐assisted subepithelial keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012; 38: 1058–1064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz‐moreno JM, Alió JL. Incidence of retinal disease following refractive surgery in 9,239 eyes. J Refract Surg 2003; 19: 534–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aras C, Ozdamar A, Karacorlu M, Sener B, Bahcecioglu H. Retinal detachment following laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 2000; 31: 121–125.
   Google Scholar
• Kato N, Toda I, Hori‐komai Y, Sakai C, Tsubota K. Five‐year outcome of LASIK for myopia. Ophthalmology 2008; 115: 839–844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansour AM, Ghabra M. Cataractogenesis after repeat laser in situ keratomileusis. Case Rep Ophthalmol 2012; 3: 262–265.
   Google Scholar
• Binder PS, Trattler WB. Evaluation of a risk factor scoring system for corneal ectasia after LASIK in eyes with normal topography. J Refract Surg 2010; 26: 241–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan CC, Hodge C, Sutton G. External analysis of the Randleman Ectasia Risk Factor Score System: a review of 36 cases of post LASIK ectasia. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2010; 38: 335–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder PS. Analysis of ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis: risk factors. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33:1530–1538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge C, Lawless M, Sutton G. Keratectasia following LASIK in a patient with uncomplicated PRK in the fellow eye. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37: 603–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randleman JB. Ectasia after LASIK: new treatments, new hope. J Refract Surg 2011; 27: 319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Hill WE, Koch DD. Evaluation of intraocular lens power prediction methods using the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons Post‐Keratorefractive Intraocular Lens Power Calculator. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36: 1466–1473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar