A prospective analysis of corneal endothelial polymegethism and cell density in young adult Asians

References

• Doughty MJ. Comparative anatomy and physiology of the cornea and conjunctiva. In: Martin herranz R, Corrales RM eds. Ocular Surface. Boca Raton, Florida, USA: CRC Press, 2012. p 32–78.
   Google Scholar
• Jonuscheit S, Doughty MJ, Ramaesh K. Assessment of a variable frame (polygonal) method to estimate corneal endothelial cell counts after corneal transplantation. Eye 2012; 26: 803–809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doughty MJ. Towards a quantitative analysis of corneal endothelial cell morphology—a review of techniques and their application. Optom Vis Sci 1989; 66: 626–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doughty MJ, Müller A, Zaman ML. Assessment of the reliability of human corneal endothelial cell density estimates using a noncontact specular microscope. Cornea 2000; 19: 148–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waring GO, Bourne WM, Edelhauser HF, Kenyon KR. The corneal endothelium. Normal and pathological structure and function. Ophthalmology 1982; 89: 531–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelhauser HF. The resiliency of the corneal endothelium to refractive and intraocular surgery. Cornea 2000; 19: 263–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne WM. Biology of the corneal endothelium in health and disease. Eye 2003; 17: 912–918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mccarey BE, Edelhauser HF, Lynn MJ. Review of corneal endothelial specular microscopy for FDA clinical trials of refractive procedures, surgical devices, and new intraocular drugs and solutions. Cornea 2008; 27: 1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry RL, Schnider CM, Holden BA, Cornish R, Grant T, Sweeney D, La hood D et al. CCLRU standards for success of daily and extended wear contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1993; 70: 234–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee RW, Matsuda M, Edelhauser HF. Wide‐field endothelial counting panels. Am J Ophthalmol 1985; 99: 596–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doughty MJ. Are there geometric determinants of cell area in rabbit and human corneal endothelial cell monolayers? Tissue Cell 1998; 30: 537–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González‐méijome JM, Jorge J, Queirós A, Peixoto‐de‐matos SC, Parafita MA. Two single descriptors of endothelial polymegethism and pleomorphism. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2010; 248: 1159–1166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson KH, Bourne WM, Mclaren JW, Brubaker RF. Variations in human corneal endothelial cell morphology and permeability to fluorescein with age. Exp Eye Res 1988; 47: 27–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung S‐W, Cho P. Endothelial cell analysis using the Topcon SP‐1000 non‐contact specular microscope and IMAGEnet system. Clin Exp Optom 1998; 81: 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Giasson CJ, Gosselin L, Masella A, Forcier P. Does endothelial cell density correlate with corneal diameter in a group of young adults? Cornea 2008; 27: 640–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim K‐S, Park S‐Y, Oh J‐S. Morphometric analysis of the corneal endothelial cells in normal Koreans [in Korean]. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 1992; 33: 24–28.
   Google Scholar
• Lee JS, Park WS, Lee SH, Oum BS, Cho BM. A comparative study of corneal endothelial changes induced by different durations of soft contact lens wear. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2001; 239: 1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuda M, Yee RW, Edelhauser HF. Comparison of the corneal endothelium in an American and a Japanese population. Arch Ophthalmol 1985; 103: 68–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stefansson A, Muller O, Sundmacher R. Non‐contact specular microscopy of the normal corneal endothelium. A statistical evaluation of morphometric parameters. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1982; 218: 200–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng S‐H, Chen FK. Morphological and fluorophotometric analysis of the corneal endothelium after radial keratotomy. Cornea 1998; 17: 471–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee RW, Matsuda M, Schultz RO, Edelhauser HF. Changes in the normal corneal endothelial cellular pattern as a function of age. Curr Eye Res 1985; 4: 671–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yunliang S, Yuqliang H, Ying‐peng L, Ming‐zhi Z, Lam DS, Rao SK. Corneal endothelial cell density and morphology in healthy Chinese eyes. Cornea 2007; 26: 130–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashemian MN, Moghimi S, Fard MA, Fallah MR, Mansouri MR. Corneal endothelial cell density and morphology in normal Iranian eyes. BMC Ophthalmol 2006; 6: 9.
   Google Scholar
• Chiang C‐C, Lin J‐M, Bair P‐J, Chen W‐L, Tseng S‐H, Tsai Y‐Y. Effects of laser in situ keratomileusis on the corneal endothelium. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2005; 21: 272–276.
   Google Scholar
• Mohd salih PAK. Corneal endothelial cell density and morphology in normal Malay eyes. Med J Malaysia 2011; 66: 300–303.
   Google Scholar
• Padilla MDB, Sibayan SAB, Gonzales CSA. Corneal endothelial cell density and morphology in normal Filipino eyes. Cornea 2004; 23: 129–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao SK, Ranjan sen P, Fogla R, Gangadharan S, Padmanabhan P, Badrinath SS. Corneal endothelial cell density and morphology in normal Indian eyes. Cornea 2000; 19: 820–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simaroj P, Kosalprapai K, Chuckpaiwong V. Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis on the corneal endothelium. J Refract Surg 2003; 19 (suppl): S237–S240.
   Google Scholar
• Sopapornamorn N, Lekskul M, Panichkul S. Corneal endothelial density and morphology in Pharmongkutkalao hospital. Clin Ophthalmol 2008; 2: 147–151.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yeniad B, Yilmaz S, Bilgin LK. Evaluation of the microstructure of cornea by in vivo confocal microscopy in contact lens wearing and non‐contact lens wearing keratoconus patients. Contact Lens Ant Eye 2010; 33: 167–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snellingen T, Gullapalli GN, Shrestha JK, Huq F, Cheng H. Quantitative and morphological characteristics of the human corneal endothelium in relation to age, gender, and ethnicity in cataract populations of South Asia. Cornea 2001; 20: 55–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanathi M, Tandon R, Sharma N, Titiyal jeewan S, Pandey ravindra M, Vajpayee rasik B. In vivo slit scanning confocal microscopy of normal corneas in Indian eyes. Indian J Ophthalmol 2003; 51: 225–230.
   Google Scholar
• Doughty MJ. Evaluation of possible error sources in corneal endothelial morphometry with a semi‐automated non‐contact specular microscope. Cornea 2013; 32: 1196–1203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doughty MJ. Could the coefficient of variation (COV) of the corneal endothelium be overestimated when a centre‐dot method is used?. Clin Exp Optom 2008; 91: 103–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doughty MJ, Oblak E. A comparison of two methods for estimating polymegethism in cell areas of the human corneal endothelium. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2008; 28: 47–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doughty MJ, Zaman ML. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures—a review and meta‐analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol 2000; 44: 367–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doughty MJ, Fonn D, Nguyen T. Assessment of the reliability of calculations of the coefficient of variation of normal and polymegethous corneal endothelium. Optom Vis Sci 1993; 70: 759–770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller A, Doughty MJ. Assessments of corneal endothelial cell density in growing children, and its relationship to horizontal corneal diameter. Optom Vis Sci 2002; 79: 762–770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor CG, Zagrod ME. Contact lens‐induced corneal endothelial polymegethism: Funtional significance and possible mechanisms. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1986; 63: 539–544.
   Google Scholar
• Rao GN. The significance of corneal endothelial polymegethism. Contact Lens J 1987; 15: 14.
   Google Scholar
• Schoessler JP, Orsborn GN. A theory of corneal endothelial polymegethism and aging. Curr Eye Res 1987; 6: 301–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doughty MJ. Concerning the symmetry of the ‘hexagonal’ cells of the corneal endothelium. Exp Eye Res 1992; 55: 145–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller A, Doughty MJ, Wright L. A re‐assessment of the corneal endothelial cell organization in children. Br J Ophthalmol 2000; 84: 692–696.
   Google Scholar
• Doughty MJ. The ambiguous coefficient of variation: Polymegethism of the corneal endothelium and central corneal thickness. Int Contact Lens Clin 1990; 17: 240–247.
   Google Scholar
• Doughty MJ. Prevalence of ‘non‐hexagonal’ cells in the corneal endothelium of young Caucasian adults, and their inter‐relationships. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1998; 18: 415–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar