How to place the computer monitor: measurements of vertical zones of clear vision with presbyopic corrections

References

• Sheedy JE. Progressive addition lenses‐‐matching the specific lens to patient needs. Optometry 2004; 75: 83–102.
   Google Scholar
• Han Y, Ciuffreda KJ, Selenow A, Bauer E, Ali SR, Spencer W. Static aspects of eye and head movements during reading in a simulated computer‐based environment with single‐vision and progressive lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 145–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han Y, Ciuffreda KJ, Selenow A, Ali SR. Dynamic interactions of eye and head movements when reading with single‐vision and progressive lenses in a simulated computer‐based environment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 1534–1545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchings N, Irving EL, Jung N, Dowling LM, Wells KA, Lillakas L. Eye and head movement alterations in naive progressive addition lens wearers. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2007; 27: 142–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrich M, Kothe J, Seidel E, Beyer L. Relation between head and eye movement and neck and shoulder complaints in presbyopic VDU users. Int Muscloskel Med 2014; 36: 26–31.
   Google Scholar
• Horgen G, Aaras A, Fagerthun H, Larsen S. Is there a reduction in postural load when wearing progressive lenses during VDT work over a three‐month period? Appl Ergon 1995; 26: 165–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheedy JE, Hardy RF. The optics of occupational progressive lenses. Optometry 2005; 76: 432–441.
   Google Scholar
• Horgen G, Aaras A, Kaiser H, Thoresen M. Do specially designed visual display unit lenses create increased postural load compared with single‐vision lenses during visual display unit work? Optom Vis Sci 2002; 79: 112–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ankrum DR, Nemeth KJ. Head and neck posture at computer workstations ‐ What's neutral? Proceedings of the 14th Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association. San Diego, California, USA. 2000; 5: 565–568.
   Google Scholar
• Masseida J, Philip J, Wicher C, Jaschinski W. Several indicators of the physiological favourable head inclination. Z Arb Wiss 2013; 67: 208–219.
   Google Scholar
• Jampel RS, Shi DX. The primary position of the eyes, the resetting saccade, and the transverse visual head plane. Head movements around the cervical joints. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992; 33: 2501–2510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Buol A. Der Einfluss von Gleitsichtbrillen auf Kopf‐und Augenbewegungen. Zürich 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Vassilieff A, Dain SJ. Bifocal wearing and VDU operation: A review and graphical analysis. Appl Ergon 1986; 17: 82–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin DK, Dain SJ. Postural modifications of VDU operators wearing bifocal spectacles. Appl Ergon 1988; 19: 293–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaschinski W. Low monitor positions when using general purpose progressive lenses at computer work in German. Zbl Arbeitsmed 2008; 58: 172–180.
   Google Scholar
• Jaschinski W, Haensel C. Measurement of vertical zones of clear vision for computer workplaces in German. In: Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft ed. 55. Kongress der Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft: Arbeit, Beschäftigungsfähigkeit und Produktivität im 21 Jahrhundert. Technische Universität Dortmund: GfA‐Press, Dortmund, 2009. p 617–620.
   Google Scholar
• König M, Jaschinski W. The use of vision test devices for measuring the vertical zones of clear vision for computer workplaces in German. In: Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft: Schütte M ed. Mensch, Technik, Organisation – Vernetzung im Produktentstehungs‐ und –herstellungsprozess. 57. Kongress der Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft. Techn. Univ. Chemnitz: Dortmund: GfA‐Press, 2011. p 645–648.
   Google Scholar
• Reiner J. Ein neues Sehtestgerät. Zbl Arbeitsmed 1980; 30: 110–113.
   Google Scholar
• Jaschinski W, König M, Mekontso TM, Ohlendorf A, Welscher M. Comparison of progressive addition lenses for general purpose and for computer vision: an office field study. Clin Exp Optom In press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• König M, Jaschinski W. A field study for individual placement of computer monitors for presbyopic users. in German. In: Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft: Schütte M ed. Gestaltung nachhaltiger Arbeitssysteme. 58. Kongress der Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft: Dortmund: GfA‐Press, 2012. p 419–422.
   Google Scholar
• Jaschinski W, König M, Masseida J, Meinert M, Weidling P. Vertical position of computer monitors ‐ a physiological concept. In: Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft: Jäger M eds. 60. Kongress der Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft: Gestaltung der Arbeitswelt der Zukunft. TU und Hochschule München: GfA‐Press, Dortmund, 2014. p 498–500.
   Google Scholar
• Masseida J, Perske F, Jaschinski W. Conditions of physiologically favourable gaze inclination. Z Arb Wiss 2013; 67: 221–231.
   Google Scholar
• Menozzi M, von Buol A, Krueger H, Miege C. Direction of gaze and comfort: discovering the relation for the ergonomic optimization of visual tasks. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1994; 14: 393–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straker L, Skoss R, Burnett A, Burgess‐limerick R. Effect of visual display height on modelled upper and lower cervical gravitational moment, muscle capacity and relative strain. Ergonomics 2009; 52: 204–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinert M, König M, Jaschinski W. Web‐based office ergonomic intervention on work‐related complaints ‐ A Field Study. Ergonomics 2014; 2013: 1658–1668.
   Google Scholar
• Allie P, Bartha MC, Kokot D, Purvis C. A field observation of display placement requirements for presbyopic and prepresbyopic computer users. Hum Fac Erg Soc P 2010; 54: 709–713.
   Google Scholar
• Allie P, Kokot D, Purvis C, Bartha MC. Computer display placement for progressive addition lens wearers: a field observation of multiple display conditions. Hum Fac Erg Soc P 2009; 53: 493–497.
   Google Scholar
• Selenow A, Bauer EA, Ali SR, Spencer LW, Ciuffreda KJ. Assessing visual performance with progressive addition lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2002; 79: 502–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anshel JR. Visual Ergonomics Handbook. Boca Ratoon, FL: CRC Taylor & Francis, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Fostervold KI. VDU work with downward gaze: the emperor's new clothes or scientifically sound? Int J Ind Ergonom 2003; 31: 161–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ankrum DR. Questioning Office Ergonomic Guidelines. In: Alexander DC, Rabourn RA eds. Applied Ergonomics. London: Taylor & Francis, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Jaschinski W. The proximity‐fixation‐disparity curve and the preferred viewing distance at a visual display as an indicator of near vision fatigue. Optom Vis Sci 2002; 79: 158–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long J, Helland M. A multidisciplinary approach to solving computer related vision problems. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2012; 32: 429–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long J, Helland M, J. A. A vision for strengthening partnerships between optometry and ergonomics. In: Mitchell R ed. HFESA 47th Annual Conference 2011, Synergy in Sydney: Creating and Maintaining Partnerships. Crows Nest, Australia: Curran Associates, Inc, 2011. p 57.
   Google Scholar
• Long J. Forging partnerships between optometrists and ergonomists to improve visual comfort and productivity in the workplace. Work 2014; 47: 365–370.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonilla‐warford N. What to do with ‘new’ presbyopes. Rev Optom 2012.
   Google Scholar