Accommodation response to Chinese and Latin characters in Chinese‐illiterate young adults

References

• Lin LLK, Shih YF, Tsai CB, Chen CJ, Lee LA, Hung PT, Hou PK. Epidemiologic study of ocular refraction among schoolchildren in Taiwan in 1995. Optom Vis Sci 1999; 76: 275–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saw S‐M. A synopsis of the prevalence rates and environmental risk factors for myopia. Clin Exp Optom 2003; 86: 289–294.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin LL, Shih YF, Hsiao CK, Chen CJ. Prevalence of myopia in Taiwanese schoolchildren: 1983 to 2000. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2004; 33: 27–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin LL, Shih YF, Hsiao CK, Chen CJ, Lee LA, Hung PT. Epidemiologic study of the prevalence and severity of myopia among schoolchildren in Taiwan in 2000. J Formos Med Assoc 2001; 100: 684–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saw SM, Tong L, Chua WH, Chia KS, Koh D, Tan DT, Katz J. Incidence and progression of myopia in Singaporean school children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 51–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan CW, Ramamurthy D, Saw SM. Worldwide prevalence and risk factors for myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2012; 32: 3–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam CS, Lam CH, Cheng SC, Chan LY. Prevalence of myopia among Hong Kong Chinese schoolchildren: changes over two decades. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2012; 32: 17–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose KA, Morgan IG, Smith W, Mitchell P. High heritability of myopia does not preclude rapid changes in prevalence. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2002; 30: 168–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose K, Smith W, Morgan I, Mitchell P. The increasing prevalence of myopia: implications for Australia. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2001; 29: 116–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutti D, Zadnik K. Age‐related decreases in the prevalence of myopia: Longitudinal change or cohort effect? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41: 2103–2107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahi JS, Cumberland PM, Peckham CS. Myopia over the lifecourse: prevalence and early life influences in the 1958 British birth cohort. Ophthalmology 2011; 118: 797–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitale S, Ellwein L, Cotch MF, Ferris FL 3rd, Sperduto R. Prevalence of refractive error in the United States, 1999‐2004. Arch Ophthalmol 2008; 126: 1111–1119.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vitale S, Sperduto RD, Ferris FL 3rd. Increased prevalence of myopia in the United States between 1971‐1972 and 1999‐2004. Arch Ophthalmol 2009; 127: 1632–1639.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saw SM, Gazzard G, Shih‐yen EC, Chua WH. Myopia and associated pathological complications. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2005; 25: 381–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flitcroft DI. The complex interactions of retinal, optical and environmental factors in myopia aetiology. Prog Retin Eye Res 2012; 31: 622–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donders F. On the Anomalies of Accommodation and Refraction (translated by W.D. Moore). London: The New Sydenham Society, 1864. p 343
   Google Scholar
• Landolt E. The Refraction and Accommodation of the Eye and their Anomalies. Edinburgh: Pentland, 1886. p 438–483.
   Google Scholar
• Mutti D, Zadnik K, Adams A. Myopia. The nature versus nurture debate goes on. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996; 37: 952–957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt E. The mystery of myopia. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2003; 81: 431–436.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zylbermann R, Landau D, Berson D. The influence of study habits on myopia in Jewish teenagers. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1993; 30: 319–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saw SM, Cheng A, Fong A, Gazzard G, Tan DT, Morgan I. School grades and myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2007; 27: 126–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saw SM, Tan SB, Fung D, Chia KS, Koh D, Tan DT, Stone RA. IQ and the association with myopia in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: 2943–2948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwiazda J, Thorn F, Held R. Accommodation, accommodative convergence, and response AC/A ratios before and at the onset of myopia in children. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 273–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwiazda JE. Accommodation and related risk factors associated with myopia progression and their interaction with treatment in COMET Children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: 2143–2151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charman WN. Near vision, lags of accommodation and myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1999; 19: 126–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwiazda J, Bauer J, Thorn F, Held R. A dynamic relationship between myopia and blur‐driven accommodation in school‐aged children. Vision Res 1995; 35: 1299–1304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwiazda J, Thorn F, Bauer J, Held R. Myopic children show insufficient accommodative response to blur. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993; 34: 690–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciuffreda K. Accommodation and its anomalies. In: Charman WN, ed. Vision and Visual Dysfunction, Vol 1: Visual Optics and Instrumentation. London: Macmillan, 1991. p 231–279,
   Google Scholar
• Ciuffreda KJ. The Glenn A Fry invited lecture. Accommodation to gratings and more naturalistic stimuli. Optom Vis Sci 1991; 68: 243–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majaj NJ, Pelli DG, Kurshan P, Palomares M. The role of spatial frequency channels in letter identification. Vision Res 2002; 42: 1165–1184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Zhang N, Han Z, Wang Y, Wang C, Chen H et al. Magnetoencephalography of language: new approaches to understanding the cortical organization of Chinese processing. Neurol Res 2010; 32: 625–628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chee MWL, Tan EWL, Thiel T. Mandarin and English single word processing studied with functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neuroscience 1999; 19: 3050–3056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan LH, Liu H‐L, Perfetti CA, Spinks JA, Fox PT, Gao J‐H. The neural system undelying Chinese logograph reading. Neuroimage 2001; 13: 836–846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan LH, Spinks JA, Gao J‐H, Liu H‐L, Perfetti CA, Xiong J et al. Brain activation in the processing of Chinese characters and words: a functional MRI study. Hum Brain Mapp 2000; 10: 16–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeo AC, Atchison DA, Schmid KL. Effect of text type on near work‐induced contrast adaptation in myopic and emmetropic young adults. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013; 54: 1478–1483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger PB. The effect of cognitive demand on accommodation. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1980; 57: 440–445.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winn B, Gilmartin B, Mortimer LC, Edwards NR. The effect of mental effort on open‐ and closed‐loop accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1991; 11: 335–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmartin B. Autonomic correlates of near‐vision in emmetropia and myopia. In: Rosenfield M, Gilmartin B, eds. Myopia and Nearwork. Oxford: Butterworth‐Heinemann, 1998. p 117–146.
   Google Scholar
• Davies LN, Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B. Cognition, ocular accommodation and cardiovascular function in emmetropes and late‐onset myopes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 1791–1796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallen EA, Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B, Tsujimura S. Clinical evaluation of the Shin‐Nippon SRW‐5000 autorefractor in adults. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2001; 21: 101–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibos LN, Wheeler W, Horner D. Power vectors: an application of Fourier analysis to the description and statistical analysis of refractive error. Optom Vis Sci 1997; 74: 367–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor J, Charman WN, O'donnell C, Radhakrishnan H. Effect of target spatial frequency on accommodative response in myopes and emmetropes. J Vis 2009; 9: 16.11–16.14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalsi M, Heron G, Charman WN. Changes in the static accommodation response with age. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2001; 21: 77–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan K, Charman WN. Single figure indices for the steady‐state accommodative response. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1995; 15: 217–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciuffreda K. Accommodation, the pupil and presbyopia. In: Benjamin WJ, ed. Borish's Clinical Refraction. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1998. p 77–120.
   Google Scholar
• Lin H, Jiang BC. Accommodative responses under different stimulus conditions. Optom Vis Sci 2013; 90: 1406–1412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeo AC, Kang KK, Tang W. Accommodative stimulus response curve of emmetropes and myopes. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2006; 35: 868–874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott ML, Schmid KL, Strang NC. Differences in the accommodation stimulus response curves of adult myopes and emmetropes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1998; 18: 13–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidel D, Gray LS, Heron G. The effect of monocular and binocular viewing on the accommodation response to real targets in emmetropia and myopia. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 279–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsdale C. The effect of ametropia on the accommodative response. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1985; 63: 167–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcbrien NA, Millodot M. The effect of refractive error on the accommodative response gradient. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1986; 6: 145–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakatsuka C, Hasebe S, Nonaka F, Ohtsuki H. Accommodative lag under habitual seeing conditions: comparison between adult myopes and emmetropes. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2003; 47: 291–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura K, Kuo W‐J, Pegado F, Cohen L, Tzeng OJ, Dehaene S. Universal systems for recognizing word shapes and handwriting gestures during reading. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2012; 109: 20762–20767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciuffreda KJ, Rosenfield M, Rosen J, Azimi A, Ong E. Accommodative responses to naturalistic stimuli. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1990; 10: 168–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar