123
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

Effect of axial length on full‐field and multifocal electroretinograms

, MPhil, , MPhil & , MS
Pages 668-675 | Received 05 Dec 2013, Accepted 01 Dec 2016, Published online: 15 Apr 2021

REFERENCES

  • Marmor MF, Fulton AB, Holder GE et al. ISCEV Standard for full field clinical electroretinography (2008 update). Doc Ophthalmol 2009; 118: 69–77.
  • Gerth C, Sutter EE, Werner JS. mfERG response dynamics of the aging retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 4443–4450.
  • Hood DC, Bach M, Brigell M et al. ISCEV Standard for clinical multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) (2011 edition). Doc Ophthalmol 2012; 124: 1–13.
  • Sen P, Bhende M, Ravi P et al. Multifocal electroretinogram in desferrioxamin‐related macular toxicity. Retin Cases Brief Rep 2010; 4: 224–228.
  • Melles RB, Marmor MF. The risk of toxic retinopathy in patients on long‐term hydroxychloroquine therapy. JAMA Ophthalmol 2014; 132: 1453–1460.
  • Westall CA, Dhaliwal HS, Panton CM et al. Values of electroretinogram responses according to axial length. Doc Ophthalmol 2001; 102: 115–130.
  • Park S, Kim SH, Park TK et al. Evaluation of structural and functional changes in non‐pathologic myopic fundus using multifocal electroretinogram and optical coherence tomography. Doc Ophthalmol 2013; 126: 199–210.
  • Logan US, Gilmartin B, Wildsoet CF. Posterior retinal contour in adult human anisomyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: 2152–2162.
  • Wakitani Y, Sasoh M, Sugimoto M. Macular thickness measurements in healthy subjects with different axial lengths using optical coherence tomography. Retina 2003; 23: 177–182.
  • Kawabata H, Adachi‐usami E. Multifocal electroretinogram in myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997; 38: 2844–2851.
  • Crewther DP. The role of photoreceptors in the control of refractive state. Prog Retin Eye Res 2000; 19: 421–457.
  • Chui TY, Yap MK, Chan HH et al. Retinal stretching limits peripheral visual acuity in myopia. Vision Res 2005; 45: 593–605.
  • Strang NC, Winn B, Bradley A. The role of neural and optical factors in limiting visual resolution in myopia. Vision Res 1998; 38: 1713–1721.
  • Subbaram MV, Bullimore MA. Visual acuity and the accuracy of the accommodative response. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2002; 22: 312–318.
  • Uchida A. Studies on electrical activities of the eye in high myopia. J Jpn Ophthalmol Soc 1987; 81: 1328–1350.
  • Moschos MN, Panayotidis D, Moschos MM et al. A preliminary assessment of macular function by MF‐ERG in myopic eyes with CNV with complete response to photodynamic therapy. Eur J Ophthalmol 2003; 13: 461–467.
  • Koh V1, Tan C, Nah G et al. Correlation of structural and electrophysiological changes in the retina of young high myopes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2014; 34: 658–666.
  • Chan HL, Mohidin N. Variation of multifocal electroretinogram with axial length. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2003; 23: 133–140.
  • Vonghanit J, Mitchell P, Wang JJ. Prevalence and progression of myopic retinopathy in an older population. Ophthalmology 2002; 109: 704–711.
  • Mcbrien NA, Adams DW. A longitudinal investigation of adult‐onset and adult‐progression of myopia in an occupational group: refractive and biometric findings. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997; 38: 321–333.
  • Atchison DA, Jones CE, Schmid KL et al. Eye shape in emmetropia and myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: 3380–3386.
  • Blach R, Jay BKH. Electrical activity of the eye in high myopia. Br J Ophthalmol 1966; 50: 629–641.
  • Chen JF, Elsner AE Burns SA et al. The effect of eye shape on retinal responses. Clin Vis Sci 1992; 7: 521–530.
  • Perlman I. Relationship between the amplitudes of the b wave and the a wave as a useful index for evaluating the electroretinogram. Br J Ophthalmol 1983; 67: 520–530.
  • Chu PH, Ng YF, Chan HH. Forward and backward adaptive effects in global flash multifocal electroretingram stimulation. Clin Exp Opom 2011; 94: 259–267.
  • Chu PH, Chan HH, Ng YF et al. Porcine global flash multifocal electroretinogram: possible mechanisms for the glaucomatous changes in contrast response function. Vision Res 2008; 48: 1726–1734.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.