The use of contact lenses in low vision rehabilitation: optical and therapeutic applications

REFERENCES

• Downie LE, Lindsay RG. Contact lens management of keratoconus. Clin Exp Optom 2015; 98: 299–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay RG, Chi JT. Contact lens management of infantile aphakia. Clin Exp Optom 2010; 93: 3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps: A Manual of Classification Relating to the Consequences of Disease. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Troilo D. Neonatal eye growth and emmetropisation‐‐a literature review. Eye (Lond) 1992; 6: 154–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan JD. The optometric management of the child with low vision. Aust J Optom 1983; 66: 142–146.
   Google Scholar
• Du JW, Schmid KL, Bevan JD et al. Retrospective analysis of refractive errors in children with vision impairment. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 807–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathan J, Kiely PM, Crewther SG et al. Disease‐associated visual image degradation and spherical refractive errors in children. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1985; 62: 680–688.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dias L, Manny RE, Weissberg E et al. Myopia, contact lens use and self‐esteem. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2013; 33: 573–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry RL, Soni PS, Horner DG. Spectacles, contact lenses and children's self‐concepts: a longitudinal study. Optom Vis Sci 1997; 74: 1044–1048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walline JJ, Jones LA, Sinnott L et al. Randomized trial of the effect of contact lens wear on self‐perception in children. Optom Vis Sci 2009; 86: 222–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saw SM. How blinding is pathological myopia? Br J Ophthalmol 2006; 90: 525–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins HG. Low vision care for the over 80's. Aust J Optom 1981; 64: 243–251.
   Google Scholar
• Lovie‐kitchin JE, Bevan JD. Paediatric low vision ‐ a survey. Aust J Optom 1982; 65: 169–177.
   Google Scholar
• Kalloniatis M, Johnston AW. Visual characteristics of low vision children. Optom Vis Sci 1990; 67: 38–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong MFA, Jackson AJ, Wolffsohn JS et al. An update on the characteristics of patients attending the Kooyong Low Vision Clinic. Clin Exp Optom 2016; 99: 555–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildsoet CF, Oswald PJ, Clark S. Albinism: its implications for refractive development. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41: 1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn GE, Dobson V, Repka MX et al Development of myopia in infants with birth weights less than 1251 grams. The Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group. Ophthalmology 1992; 99: 329–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieving PA, Fishman GA. Refractive errors of retinitis pigmentosa patients. Br J Ophthalmol 1978; 62: 163–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saw SM, Gazzard G, Shih‐yen EC et al. Myopia and associated pathological complications. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2005; 25: 381–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden BA, Jong M, Davis S et al. Nearly 1 billion myopes at risk of myopia‐related sight‐threatening conditions by 2050 ‐ time to act now. Clin Exp Optom 2015; 98: 491–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gumpelmayer TF. Special considerations in the fitting of corneal lenses in high myopia. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1970; 47: 879–886.
   Google Scholar
• Graham M. Children and contact lenses. Aust J Optom 1976; 59: 202–209.
   Google Scholar
• Fonda G. Evaluation of contact lenses for central vision in high myopia. Br J Ophthalmol 1974; 58: 141–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr J. High ametropia. In: Efron N ed. Contact Lens Practice. Oxford: Butterworth‐Heinemann, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Astin CL. Contact lens fitting in high degree myopia. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 1999; 22 (Suppl 1): S14–19.
   Google Scholar
• Pullum K. The role of scleral lenses in modern contac lens practice. In: Phillips A, Speedwell L eds. Contact Lenses. Oxford: Butterwqorth‐Heinemann, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Carney LG, Mainstone JC, Henderson BA. Corneal topography and myopia. A cross‐sectional study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997; 38: 311–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang SW, Tsai IL, Hu FR et al. The cornea in young myopic adults. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85: 916–920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Port M. Curvature changes in dehydrating soft lenses (Part I). J Br Cont Lens Ass 1982; 5: 42–53.
   Google Scholar
• Dallos J. Contact glasses, the ‘invisible’ spectacles. Arch Ophthalmol 1936; 15: 617.
   Google Scholar
• Bettman J, Mcnair G. A contact‐lens‐telescopic system. Am J Ophthalmol 1939; 22: 27–32.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent SJ. The use of contact lens telescopic systems in low vision rehabilitation. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2017; 40: 131–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuster GM, Arianpour A, Cookson S et al. Wink‐controlled polarization‐switched telescopic contact lenses. Appl Opt 2015; 54: 9597–9605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arianpour A, Schuster GM, Tremblay EJ et al. Wearable telescopic contact lens. Appl Opt 2015; 54: 7195–7204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay EJ, Stamenov I, Beer RD et al. Switchable telescopic contact lens. Opt Express 2013; 21: 15980–15986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone J. Special types of contact lenses and their uses. In: Stone J, Phillips A eds. Contact Lenses. London: Barrie & Jenkins, 1972. p 419–562.
   Google Scholar
• Mandell R. Low Vision. In: Mandell RB, ed. Contact Lens Practice: Hard and Flexible Lenses. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C Thomas, 1974. p 633–648.
   Google Scholar
• Yu XX, Rego RE Jr, Shechtman D. Achromatopsia: case presentation and literature review emphasising the value of spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Clin Exp Optom 2014; 97: 507–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn JT, Kazarian E, Barricks M. Paradoxical pupil in congenital achromatopsia. Int Ophthalmol 1981; 3: 91–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pokorny J, Smith VC, Pinkers AJ et al. Classification of complete and incomplete autosomal; recessive achromatopsia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1982; 219: 121–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weis AH, Biersdorf WR. Blue cone monochromatism. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1989; 26: 218–223.
   Google Scholar
• Haegerstrom‐portnoy G, Schneck ME, Verdon WA et al. Clinical vision characteristics of the congenital achromatopsias. I. Visual acuity, refractive error and binocular status. Optom Vis Sci 1996; 73: 446–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schornack M, Brown W, Siemsen D. The use of tinted contact lenses in the management of achromatopsia. Optometry 2007; 78: 17–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Terry RL. The use of tinted contact lenses in a case of congenital rod monochromatism. Clin Exp Optom 1988; 71: 188–190.
   Google Scholar
• Rajak SN, Currie AD, Dubois VJ et al. Tinted contact lenses as an alternative management for photophobia in stationary cone dystrophies in children. J AAPOS 2006; 10: 336–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park WL, Sunness JS. Red contact lenses for alleviation of photophobia in patients with cone disorders. Am J Ophthalmol 2004; 137: 774–775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Severinsky B, Yahalom C, Florescu sebok T, et al. Red‐tinted contact lenses may improve quality of life in retinal diseases. Optom Vis Sci 2016; 93: 445–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes L. Absorptive and tinted contact lens for reduction of glare. Int Congr Ser 2005; 1282: 534–538.
   Google Scholar
• O'connor PS, Tredici TJ, Ivan DJ et al. Achromatopsia. Clinical diagnosis and treatment. J Clin Neuroophthalmol 1982; 2: 219–226.
   Google Scholar
• Efron N, Morgan PB, Cameron ID et al. Oxygen permeability and water content of silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Optom Vis Sci 2007; 84: 328–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnear PE, Jay B, Witkop CJ Jr. Albinism. Surv Ophthalmol 1985; 30: 75–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonda G. Characteristics and low‐vision corrections in albinism. A report of 161 patients. Arch Ophthalmol 1962; 68: 754–761.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fonda G, Thomas H, Gore GV, 3rd. Educational and vocational placement and low‐vision corrections in albinism. A report bases on 253 patients. Sight Sav Rev 1971; 41: 29–36.
   Google Scholar
• Yahalom C, Tzur V, Blumenfeld A et al. Refractive profile in oculocutaneous albinism and its correlation with final visual outcome. Br J Ophthalmol 2012; 96: 537–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read SA, Collins MJ, Carney LG. The influence of eyelid morphology on normal corneal shape. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48: 112–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemper RA. Karl W. Ascher 1887‐1971. Am J Ophthalmol 1972; 73: 140.
   Google Scholar
• Ascher KW. Ringfoermig gefaerbte Kontaktglaesar bei Albinismus. Klin Mbl Augenh 1930; 85: 829.
   Google Scholar
• Girad L, Camp R, Lamb V et al. Iris corneal contact lenses. Am J Ophthalmol 1961; 52: 264–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton J. Use of contact lenses by a three year old partial albinotic with high myopia: case report. Eye Ear Nose Throat Mon 1959; 38: 565–568.
   Google Scholar
• Epsy J. Cosmetic scleral contact lenses and shells. Am J Ophthalmol 1968; 66: 95–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazow B. The pupilens ‐ a preliminary report. Contacto 1958; 2: 128–131.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips A. A prosthetic contact lens in the treatment of ocular manefestations of albinism. Clin Exp Optom 1989; 72: 32–34.
   Google Scholar
• Fonda G. Management of the Patient with Subnormal Vision. St Louis: Mosby, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson LB, Spaeth GL, Nowinski TS et al. Aniridia. A review. Surv Ophthalmol 1984; 28: 621–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enoch J, Windsor C. Remission of nystagmus following fitting contact lenses to an infant with aniridia. Am J Ophthalmol 1968; 66: 333–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbloom A. The controlled‐pupil contac lens in low vision problems. J Am Optom Assoc 1969; 40: 836–840.
   Google Scholar
• Dua HS, Saini JS, Azuara‐blanco A et al. Limbal stem cell deficiency: concept, aetiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis and management. Indian J Ophthalmol 2000; 48: 83–92.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller J. Refractions and reflections. Surv Ophthalmol 2004; 49: 436.
   Google Scholar
• Allen ED, Davies PD. Role of contact lenses in the management of congenital nystagmus. Br J Ophthalmol 1983; 67: 834–836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abadi RV. Visual performance with contact lenses and congenital idiopathic nystagmus. Br J Physiol Opt 1979; 33: 32–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biousse V, Tusa RJ, Russell B et al. The use of contact lenses to treat visually symptomatic congenital nystagmus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004; 75: 314–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutner D, Ciuffreda KJ. Soft contact lenses to improve motor and sensory function in congenital nystagmus. J Behav Optom 2005; 16: 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Abel LA. Infantile nystagmus: current concepts in diagnosis and management. Clin Exp Optom 2006; 89: 57–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taibbi G, Wang ZI, Dell'osso LF. Infantile nystagmus syndrome: Broadening the high‐foveation‐quality field with contact lenses. Clin Ophthalmol 2008; 2: 585–589.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jayaramachandran P, Proudlock FA, Odedra N et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing soft contact lens and rigid gas‐permeable lens wearing in infantile nystagmus. Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 1827–1836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drasdo N. An experimental and clinical system for producing retinal image constraint under quasi‐normal viewing conditions. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1965; 42: 748–756.
   Google Scholar
• Drasdo N. The effect of high powered contact lenses on the visual fixation reflex. Br J Physiol Opt 1970; 25: 14–22.
   Google Scholar
• Yaniglos SS, Leigh RJ. Refinement of an optical device that stabilizes vision in patients with nystagmus. Optom Vis Sci 1992; 69: 447–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushton D, Cox N. A new optical treatment for oscillopsia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987; 50: 411–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensil J, Gurwood AS. Understanding nystagmus. Optometry 2000; 71: 439–448.
   Google Scholar
• Safran AB, Gambazzi Y. Congenital nystagmus: rebound phenomenon following removal of contact lenses. Br J Ophthalmol 1992; 76: 497–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iskander DR, Collins MJ. Applications of high‐speed videokeratoscopy. Clin Exp Optom 2005; 88: 223–231.
   Google Scholar
• Josephson JE, Caffery BE. Visual field loss with colored hydrogel lenses. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1987; 64: 38–40.
   Google Scholar
• Insler MS, Hendricks C, George DM. Visual field constriction caused by colored contact lenses. Arch Ophthalmol 1988; 106: 1680–1682.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce A, Vingrys A. Does a cosmetic coloured contact lens change the visual sensitivity of patients? Clin Exp Optom 1990; 73: 200–204.
   Google Scholar
• Trick LR, Egan DJ. Opaque tinted contact lenses and the visual field. ICLC 1990; 17: 192–195.
   Google Scholar
• Lee DY, Jurkus JM, Ma S. Effect of the opaque, colored dot‐matrix contact lens on visual field. ICLC 1990; 17: 189–191.
   Google Scholar
• Atchison DA, Blazaki S, Suheimat M et al. Do small‐aperture presbyopic corrections influence the visual field? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2016; 36: 51–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carkeet A. Field restriction and vignetting in contact lenses with opaque peripheries. Clin Exp Optom 1998; 81: 151–158.
   Google Scholar
• Ozkagnici A, Zengin N, Kamis O et al. Do daily wear opaquely tinted hydrogel soft contact lenses affect contrast sensitivity function at one meter? Eye Contact Lens 2003; 29: 48–49.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher K, Comstock T. Clinical comparision of opaque tint soft contact lenses. Int Cont Lens Cong 1996; 23: 128–137.
   Google Scholar
• Voetz SC, Collins MJ, Lingelbach B. Recovery of corneal topography and vision following opaque‐tinted contact lens wear. Eye Contact Lens 2004; 30: 111–117.
   Google Scholar
• Abadi RV, Papas E. Visual performance with artificial iris contact lenses. J BCLA 1987; 10: 10–15.
   Google Scholar
• Port MJA. Cosmetic and prosthetic contact lenses. In: Phillips A, Speedwell L eds. Contact Lenses, 4th ed. Oxford: Butterworth‐Heinemann, 1997. p 743–757.
   Google Scholar