Epidemiology of contact lens‐induced infiltrates: an updated review

REFERENCES

• Kaufman HE. Problems associated with prolonged wear soft contact‐lenses. Ophthalmology 1979; 86: 411–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donshik PC, Suchecki JK, Ehlers WH. Peripheral corneal infiltrates associated with contact lens wear. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1995; 93: 49–60.
   Google Scholar
• Wu P, Stapleton F, Willcox MD. The causes of and cures for contact lens‐induced peripheral ulcer. Eye Contact Lens 2003; 29(1 Suppl): S63–66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stapleton F, Keay L, Jalbert I, Cole N. The epidemiology of contact lens related infiltrates. Optom Vis Sci 2007; 84: 257–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers RL. What have pre‐ and post‐approval studies shown about contact lens‐related inflammatory events? Eye Contact Lens 2007; 33: 388–391.
   Google Scholar
• Efron N, Morgan PB, Hill EA et al. Incidence and morbidity of contact lens‐associated keratitis and relevant risk factors: a 12-month hospital‐based survey. Invest Ophth Vis Sci 2005; 46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron N, Morgan PB, Hill EA et al. Incidence and morbidity of hospital‐presenting corneal infiltrative events associated with contact lens wear. Clin Exp Optom 2005; 88: 232–239.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ciba Vision Care. Summary of safety and effectiveness data for 30-day wear of lotrafilcon A. 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers RL, Mcnally JJ, Schein OD et al. Risk factors for corneal infiltrates with continuous wear of contact lenses. Optometry Vision Sci 2007; 84: 573–579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bausch & Lomb. FDA summary of safety and effectiveness data for a supplemental premarket application for balafilcon A hydrophilic contact lenses. 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Vistakon. FDA summary of safety and effectiveness data for a supplemental premarket application for senofilcon A hydrophilic contact lenses. 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Szczotka‐flynn L, Debanne SM, Cheruvu VK et al. Predictive factors for corneal infiltrates with continuous wear of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Arch Ophthalmol 2007; 125: 488–492.
   Google Scholar
• Szczotka‐flynn L, Diaz M. Risk of corneal inflammatory events with silicone hydrogel and low Dk hydrogel extended contact lens wear: a meta‐analysis. Optom Vis Sci 2007; 84: 247–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczotka‐flynn L, Lass JH, Sethi A et al. Risk factors for corneal infiltrative events during continuous wear of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Invest Ophth Vis Sci 2010; 51: 5421–5430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczotka‐flynn LB, Jiang Y, Stiegemeier MJ et al. Mucin balls influence corneal infiltrative events. Optom Vis Sci 2017; 94: 448–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers RL, Keay L, Mcnally J, Kern J. Multicenter case‐control study of the role of lens materials and care products on the development of corneal infiltrates. Optom Vision Sci 2012; 89: 316–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers RL, Wagner H, Mitchell GL et al. Age and other risk factors for corneal infiltrative and inflammatory events in young soft contact lens wearers from the Contact Lens Assessment in Youth (CLAY) Study. Invest Ophth Vis Sci 2011; 52: 6690–6696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczotka‐flynn L, Jiang Y, Raghupathy S et al. Corneal inflammatory events with daily silicone hydrogel lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 2014; 91: 3–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnt NA, Evans VE, Naduvilath TJ et al. Contact lens‐related adverse events and the silicone hydrogel lenses and daily wear care system used. Arch Ophthalmol 2009; 127: 1616–1623.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stein RM, Clinch TE, Cohen EJ et al. Infected vs sterile corneal infiltrates in contact‐lens wearers. Am J Ophthalmol 1988; 105: 632–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcdonnell PJ, Nobe J, Gauderman WJ et al. Community care of corneal ulcers. Am J Ophthalmol 1992; 114: 531–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron N, Morgan PB, Hill EA et al. The size, location, and clinical severity of corneal infiltrative events associated with contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 519–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Josephson JCB. Infiltrative keratitis in hydrogel lens wearers. Int Contact Lens Clinic 1979; 6: 223–228.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney DF, Jalbert I, Covey M et al. Clinical characterization of corneal infiltrative events observed with soft contact lens wear. Cornea 2003; 22: 435–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum J, Donshik PC. Corneal infiltrates associated with soft contact lens wear. Cornea 2004; 23: 421–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron N, Morgan PB. Can subtypes of contact lens‐associated corneal infiltrative events be clinically differentiated? Cornea 2006; 25: 540–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aasuri MK, Venkata N, Kumar VM. Differential diagnosis of microbial keratitis and contact lens‐induced peripheral ulcer. Eye Contact Lens 2003; 29(1 Suppl): S60–62.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan PB, Efron N, Hill EA et al. Incidence of keratitis of varying severity among contact lens wearers. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89: 430–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers RL, Keay L, Long B et al. Risk factors for contact lens complications in US clinical practices. Optom Vis Sci 2010; 87: 725–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapleton F, Dart JK, Minassian D. Risk factors with contact lens related suppurative keratitis. CLAO J 1993; 19: 204–210.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mcnally JJ, Chalmers RL, Mckenney CD, Robirds S. Risk factors for corneal infiltrative events with 30‐night continuous wear of silicone hydrogel lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2003; 29(1 Suppl): S153–156.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman AB, Emch AJ, Geldis J et al. Contact lens corneal inflammatory events in a university population. Optom Vis Sci 2016; 93: 42–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen ME, Chalmers R, Mitchell GL et al. Characterization of patients who report compliant and non‐compliant overnight wear of soft contact lenses. Contact Lens Anterio 2011; 34: 229–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner H, Richdale K, Mitchell GL et al. Age, Behavior, environment, and health factors in the soft contact lens risk survey. Optom Vis Sci 2014; 91: 252–261.
   Google Scholar
• Bui TH, Cavanagh HD, Robertson DM. Patient compliance during contact lens wear: perceptions, awareness, and behavior. Eye Contact Lens‐Sci Clin Pract 2010; 36: 334–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullimore MA. The safety of soft contact lenses in children. Optom Vis Sci 2017; 94: 638–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du toit R, John T, Sweeney D et al. Association of age, gender, and ethnicity with the incidence of adverse responses with extended wear of silicone hydrogel lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2002; 79: 9.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan PB, Efron N, Brennan NA et al. Risk factors for the development of corneal infiltrative events associated with contact lens wear. Invest Ophth Vis Sci 2005; 46: 3136–3143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn J, Slovic P, Mertz CK. Gender, race, and perception of environmental‐health risks. Risk Anal 1994; 14: 1101–1108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapleton F, Keay L, Edwards K et al. The incidence of contact lens‐related microbial keratitis in Australia. Ophthalmology 2008; 115: 1655–1662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapleton F, Edwards K, Keay L et al. Risk factors for moderate and severe microbial keratitis in daily wear contact lens users. Ophthalmology 2012; 119: 1516–1521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keay L, Edwards K, Stapleton F. Signs, symptoms, and comorbidities in contact lens‐related microbial keratitis. Optom Vis Sci 2009; 86: 803–809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin TY, Yeh LK, Ma DHK et al. Risk factors and microbiological features of patients hospitalized for microbial keratitis a 10‐year study in a referral center in Taiwan. Medicine 2015; 94: 43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankaridurg PR, Willcox MDP, Sharma S et al. Haemophilus influenzae adherent to contact lenses associated with production of acute ocular inflammation. J Clin Microbiol 1996; 34: 2426–2431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner H, Chalmers RL, Mitchell GL et al. Risk factors for interruption to soft contact lens wear in children and young adults. Optom Vision Sci 2011; 88: 973–980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutter GR, Chalmers RL, Roseman M. The clinical presentation, prevalence, and risk factors of focal corneal infiltrates in soft contact lens wearers. CLAO J 1996; 22: 30–37.
   Google Scholar
• Radford CF, Minassian D, Dart JKG, Stapleton F, Verma S. Risk factors for nonulcerative contact lens complications in an ophthalmic accident and emergency department a case‐control study. Ophthalmology 2009; 116: 385–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richdale K, Lam DY, Wagner H et al. Case‐control pilot study of soft contact lens wearers with corneal infiltrative events and healthy controls. Invest Ophth Vis Sci 2016; 57: 47–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Jacobs M, Bajaksouzian S et al. Risk factors for microbial bioburden during daily wear of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2014; 40: 148–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Didilescu AC, Hanganu SC, Galie N et al. The role of smoking in changing essential parameters in body homeostasis. Pneumologia 2009; 58: 89–94.
   Google Scholar
• Brook I. Effects of exposure to smoking on the microbial flora of children and their parents. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2010; 74: 447–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brook I, Gober AE. Recovery of potential pathogens and interfering bacteria in the nasopharynx of smokers and nonsmokers. Chest 2005; 127: 2072–2075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samet JM. Adverse effects of smoke exposure on the upper airway. Tob Control 2004; 13 Suppl 1: i57–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larsson L, Pehrson C, Dechen T, Crane‐godreau M. Microbiological components in mainstream and sidestream cigarette smoke. Tob Induc Dis 2012; 10: 13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szponar B, Pehrson C, Larsson L. Bacterial and fungal markers in tobacco smoke. Sci Total Environ 2012; 438: 447–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pronk NP, Peek CJ, Goldstein MG. Addressing multiple behavioral risk factors in primary care a synthesis of current knowledge and stakeholder dialogue sessions. Am J Prev Med 2004; 27: 4–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shankar A, Mcmunn A, Steptoe A. Health‐related behaviors in older adults’ relationships with socioeconomic status. Am J Prev Med 2010; 38: 39–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu YT, Willcox MDP, Stapleton F. The effect of contact lens hygiene behavior on lens case contamination. Optom Vision Sci 2015; 92: 167–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Trade Commission. Contact Lens Rule. Federal Register 2016; 81: 88526–88528.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers RL, Wagner H, Kinoshita B et al. Is purchasing lenses from the prescriber associated with better habits among soft contact lens wearers? Contact Lens Anterior Eye 2016; 39: 435–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Carnt N, Stapleton F. Contact lens user profile, attitudes and level of compliance to lens care. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 2010; 33: 183–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorbara L, Zimmerman AB, Mitchell GL et al. Multicenter testing of a risk assessment survey for soft contact lens wearers with adverse events: a contact lens assessment in youth study. Eye Contact Lens 2016. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young G, Young AG, Lakkis C. Review of complications associated with contact lenses from unregulated sources of supply. Eye Contact Lens 2014; 40: 58–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanagh HD, Ladage PM, Li SL et al. Effects of daily and overnight wear of a novel hyper oxygen‐transmissible soft contact lens on bacterial binding and corneal epithelium: a 13‐month clinical trial. Ophthalmology 2002; 109: 1957–1969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren DH, Yamamoto K, Ladage PM et al. Adaptive effects of 30‐night wear of hyper‐O(2) transmissible contact lenses on bacterial binding and corneal epithelium: a 1‐year clinical trial. Ophthalmology 2002; 109: 27–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doughty MJ, Aakre BM, Ystenaes AE, Svarverud E. Short‐term adaptation of the human corneal endothelium to continuous wear of silicone hydrogel (lotrafilcon A) contact lenses after daily hydrogel lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 473–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keay L, Sweeney DF, Jalbert I et al. Microcyst response to high Dk/t silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2000; 77: 582–585.
   Google Scholar
• Lin MC, Graham AD, Polse KA et al. The effects of one‐hour wear of high‐Dk soft contact lenses on corneal pH and epithelial permeability. CLAO J 2000; 26: 130–133.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan PB, Efron N, Maldonado‐codina C, Efron S. Adverse events and discontinuations with rigid and soft hyper Dk contact lenses used for continuous wear. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 528–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papas EB, Vajdic CM, Austen R, Holden BA. High‐oxygen‐transmissibility soft contact lenses do not induce limbal hyperaemia. Curr Eye Res 1997; 16: 942–948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta D, Cole N, Willcox M. Factors influencing bacterial adhesion to contact lenses. Mol Vis 2012; 18: 14–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriques M, Sousa C, Lira M et al. Adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus epidermidis to silicone‐hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 446–450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodjikian L, Casoli‐bergeron E, Malet F et al. Bacterial adhesion to conventional hydrogel and new silicone‐hydrogel contact lens materials. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2008; 246: 267–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willcox MD, Harmis N, Cowell et al. Bacterial interactions with contact lenses; effects of lens material, lens wear and microbial physiology. Biomaterials 2001; 22: 3235–3247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole N, Hume EBH, Vijay AK et al. In vivo performance of melimine as an antimicrobial coating for contact lenses in models of CLARE and CLPU. Invest Ophth Vis Sci 2010; 51: 390–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta D, Vijay AK, Kumar N, Willcox MDP. Melimine‐coated antimicrobial contact lenses reduce microbial keratitis in an animal model. Invest Ophth Vis Sci 2016; 57: 5616–5624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan NA, Coles ML. To the editor: risk of corneal inflammatory events with silicone hydrogel and low Dk hydrogel extended contact lens wear: a meta‐analysis. Optom Vis Sci 2008; 85: 364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumbleton KA, Woods CA, Jones LW, Fonn D. The relationship between compliance with lens replacement and contact lens‐related problems in silicone hydrogel wearers. Contact Lens Anterior 2011; 34: 216–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazon de la jara P, Papas E, Diec J et al. Effect of lens care systems on the clinical performance of a contact lens. Optom Vis Sci 2013; 90: 344–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnt N, Jalbert I, Stretton S et al. Solution toxicity in soft contact lens daily wear is associated with corneal inflammation. Optometry Vision Sci 2007; 84: 309–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willcox MD, Carnt N, Diec J et al. Contact lens case contamination during daily wear of silicone hydrogels. Optom Vis Sci 2010; 87: 456–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczotka‐flynn LB, Pearlman E, Ghannoum M. Microbial contamination of contact lenses, lens care solutions, and their accessories: a literature review. Eye Contact Lens‐Sci Clin Pract 2010; 36: 116–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilia D, Lazon de la Jara P et al. The effect of compliance on contact lens case contamination. Optom Vis Sci 2014; 91: 262–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu YT, Zhu H, Harmis NY et al. Profile and frequency of microbial contamination of contact lens cases. Optom Vis Sci 2010; 87: E152–E158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu YTY, Willcox M, Zhu H, Stapleton F. Contact lens hygiene compliance and lens case contamination: A review. Contact Lens Anterior 2015; 38: 307–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu YT, Zhu H, Willcox M, Stapleton F. Removal of biofilm from contact lens storage cases. Invest Ophth Vis Sci 2010; 51: 6329–6333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montville R, Schaffner DW. A meta‐analysis of the published literature on the effectiveness of antimicrobial soaps. J Food Protect 2011; 74: 1875–1882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu YT, Zhu H, Willcox M, Stapleton F. Impact of air‐drying lens cases in various locations and positions. Optometry Vision Sci 2010; 87: 465–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retuerto MA, Szczotka‐flynn L, Ho DH, Mukherjee P, Ghannoum MA. Efficacy of care solutions against contact lens‐associated fusarium biofilms. Optometry Vision Sci 2012; 89: 382–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczotka‐flynn LB, Imamura Y, Chandra J et al. Increased resistance of contact lens‐related bacterial biofilms to antimicrobial activity of soft contact lens care solutions. Cornea 2009; 28: 918–926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozkan J, Mandathara P, Krishna P et al. Risk factors for corneal inflammatory and mechanical events with extended wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vision Sci 2010; 87: 847–853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall B, Mccanna D, Jones L. Identification of coagulase‐negative staphylococci in daily disposable contact lens wearers. Lett Appl Microbiol 2014; 59: 313–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yung MS, Boost M, Cho P, Yap M. Microbial contamination of contact lenses and lens care accessories of soft contact lens wearers (university students) in Hong Kong. Ophthal Physiol Opt 2007; 27: 11–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray TB, Cursons RTM, Sherwan JF, Rose PR. Acanthamoeba, bacterial, and fungal contamination of contact‐lens storage cases. Brit J Ophthalmol 1995; 79: 601–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearlman E, Johnson A, Adhikary G et al. Toll‐like receptors at the ocular surface. Ocul Surf 2008; 6: 108–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willcox M, Sharma S, Naduvilath TJ, Sankaridurg PR, Gopinathan U, Holden BA. External ocular surface and lens microbiota in contact lens wearers with corneal infiltrates during extended wear of hydrogel lenses. Eye Contact Lens‐Sci Clin Pract 2011; 37: 90–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden BA, La hood D, Grant T et al. Gram‐negative bacteria can induce contact lens related acute red eye (CLARE) responses. CLAO J 1996; 22: 47–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Szczotka‐flynn LB, Bajaksouzian S, Jacobs MR, Rimm A. Risk factors for contact lens bacterial contamination during continuous wear. Optom Vis Sci 2009; 86: 1216–1226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willcox MD, Power KN, Stapleton F et al. Potential sources of bacteria that are isolated from contact lenses during wear. Optom Vis Sci 1997; 74: 1030–1038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney DF, Stapleton F, Leitch C et al. Microbial colonization of soft contact lenses over time. Optom Vis Sci 2001; 78; 100–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozkan J, Willcox MD, Rathi VM et al. Effect of antibiotic drops on adverse events during extended lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 2014; 91; 13–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson DM, Cavanagh HD. Non‐compliance with contact lens wear and care practices: a comparative analysis. Optom Vision Sci 2011; 88: 1402–1408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumbleton K, Richter D, Woods C et al. Compliance with contact lens replacement in Canada and the United States. Optom Vis Sci 2010; 87: 131–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers RL, Hickson‐curran SB, Keay L et al. Rates of adverse events with hydrogel and silicone hydrogel daily disposable lenses in a large postmarket surveillance registry: the TEMPO Registry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015; 56: 654–663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houang E, Lam D, Fan D, Seal D. Microbial keratitis in Hong Kong: relationship to climate, environment and contact‐lens disinfection. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2001; 95: 361–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seal D, Stapleton F, Dart J. Possible environmental sources of Acanthamoeba spp in contact lens wearers. Br J Ophthalmol 1992; 76: 424–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seal DV, Kirkness CM, Bennett HG, Peterson M, Keratitis Study G. Acanthamoeba keratitis in Scotland: risk factors for contact lens wearers. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 1999; 22: 58–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Szczotka‐flynn L, Benetz BA, Lass J et al. The association between mucin balls and corneal infiltrative events during extended contact lens wear. Cornea 2011; 30: 535–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar