The association of keratoconus with blepharitis

REFERENCES

• Grunauer‐kloevekorn C, Duncker GI. Keratoconus: epidemiology, risk factors and diagnosis. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2006; 223: 493–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edrington TB, Zadnik K, Barr JT. Keratoconus. Optom Clin 1995; 4: 65–73.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol 1998; 42: 297–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz YS. The genetics of keratoconus. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 2003; 16: 607–620, vii.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Balasubramanian SA, Pye DC, Willcox MD. Are proteinases the reason for keratoconus? Curr Eye Res 2010; 35: 185–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lema I, Sobrino T, Duran JA et al. Subclinical keratoconus and inflammatory molecules from tears. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93: 820–824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier SA. Is the corneal degradation in keratoconus caused by matrix‐metalloproteinases? Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2001; 29: 340–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenney MC, Chwa M, Atilano SR et al. Increased levels of catalase and cathepsin V/L2 but decreased TIMP‐1 in keratoconus corneas: evidence that oxidative stress plays a role in this disorder. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 823–832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahuja N, Kumar NR, Shroff R et al. Differential molecular expression of extracellular matrix and inflammatory genes at the corneal cone apex drives focal weakening in keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2016; 57: 5372–5382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcmonnies CW. Abnormal rubbing and keratectasia. Eye Contact Lens 2007; 33: 265–271.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mcmonnies CW. Mechanisms of rubbing‐related corneal trauma in keratoconus. Cornea 2009; 28: 607–615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auw‐haedrich C, Reinhard T. Chronic blepharitis. Pathogenesis, clinical features, and therapy. Ophthalmologe 2007; 104: 817–826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon A, Dursun D, Liu Z et al. Pro‐ and anti‐inflammatory forms of interleukin‐1 in the tear fluid and conjunctiva of patients with dry‐eye disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001; 42: 2283–2292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeda N, Klyce SD, Smolek MK. Comparison of methods for detecting keratoconus using videokeratography. Arch Ophthalmol 1995; 113: 870–874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz YS, Mcdonnell PJ. Computer‐assisted corneal topography in keratoconus. Refract Corneal Surg 1989; 5: 400–408.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bron AJ. Diagnosis of dry eye. Surv Ophthalmol 2001; 45 (Suppl 2): S221–S226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serruya LG, Nogueira DC, Hida RY. Schirmer test performed with open and closed eyes: variations in normal individuals. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2009; 72: 65–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols KK, Foulks GN, Bron AJ et al. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: executive summary. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 1922–1929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz YS. Videokeratographic indices to aid in screening for keratoconus. J Refract Surg 1995; 11: 371–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G et al. Reliability and validity of the ocular surface disease index. Arch Ophthalmol 2000; 118: 615–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viso E, Rodriguez‐ares MT, Abelenda D et al. Prevalence of asymptomatic and symptomatic meibomian gland dysfunction in the general population of Spain. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012; 53: 2601–2606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon MO, Steger‐may K, Szczotka‐flynn L et al. Baseline factors predictive of incident penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 2006; 142: 923–930.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves SW, Stinnett S, Adelman RA et al. Risk factors for progression to penetrating keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 140: 607–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafri B, Lichter H, Stulting RD. Asymmetric keratoconus attributed to eye rubbing. Cornea 2004; 23: 560–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcmonnies CW, Boneham GC. Keratoconus, allergy, itch, eye‐rubbing and hand‐dominance. Clin Exp Optom 2003; 86: 376–384.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Viso E, Gude F, Rodriguez‐ares MT. The association of meibomian gland dysfunction and other common ocular diseases with dry eye: a population‐based study in Spain. Cornea 2011; 30: 1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knop E, Knop N, Millar T et al. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the subcommittee on anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology of the meibomian gland. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 1938–1978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackie CA, Korb DR, Knop E et al. Nonobvious obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction. Cornea 2010; 29: 1333–1345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumoto Y, Shigeno Y, Sato EA et al. The evaluation of the treatment response in obstructive meibomian gland disease by in vivo laser confocal microscopy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2009; 247: 821–829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downie LE, Lindsay RG. Contact lens management of keratoconus. Clin Exp Optom 2015; 98: 299–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar