Contrast sensitivity of amblyopic eyes in children with myopic anisometropia

REFERENCES

• von Noorden GK. Binocular Vision and Ocular Motility. Theory and Management of Strabismus., 5th ed. St Louis: The CV Mosby Co, 1996. p. 216.
   Google Scholar
• Attebo K, Mitchell P, Cumming R et al. Prevalence and causes of amblyopia in an adult population. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 154–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons K. Preschool vision screening: rationale, methodology and outcome. Surv Ophthalmol 1996; 41: 3–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repka MX, Cotter SA, Beck RW et al. A randomized trial of atropine regimens for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Ophthalmology 2004; 111: 2076–2085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes JM, Kraker RT, Beck RW et al. A randomized trial of prescribed patching regimens for treatment of severe amblyopia in children. Ophthalmology 2003; 110: 2075–2087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace DK, Edwards AR, Cotter SA et al. A randomized trial to evaluate 2 hours of daily patching for strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia in children. Ophthalmology 2006; 113: 904–912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheiman MM, Hertle RW, Beck RW et al. Randomized trial of treatment of amblyopia in children aged 7 to 17 years. Arch Ophthalmol 2005; 123: 437–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydberg A, Han Y. Assessment of contrast sensitivity in children aged 3 years 9 months ‐ 6 years with normal vision, visual impairment due to ocular disease and strabismic amblyopia. Strabismus 1999; 7: 79–95.
   Google Scholar
• Rydberg A, Han Y, Lennerstrand G. A comparison between different contrast sensitivity tests in the detection of amblyopia. Strabismus 1997; 5: 167–184.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campos EC, Prampolini ML, Gulli R. Contrast sensitivity differences between strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia: objective correlate by means of visual evoked responses. Doc Ophthalmol 1984; 58: 45–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lourthai P, Bhurayanontachai P. Pattern of contrast sensitivity changes in acute central serous chorioretinopathy. J Ophthalmol 2017; 2017: 9053932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shandiz JH, Derakhshan A, Daneshyar A et al. Effect of cataract type and severity on visual acuity and contrast sensitivity. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2011; 6: 26–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sjostrand J. Contrast sensitivity in children with strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia. A study of the effect of treatment. Acta Ophthalmol 1981; 59: 25–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess RF, Howell ER. The threshold contrast sensitivity function in strabismic amblyopia: evidence for a two type classification. Vision Res 1977; 17: 1049–1055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahamsson M, Sjostrand J. Contrast sensitivity and acuity relationship in strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol 1988; 72: 44–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley A, Freeman RD. Contrast sensitivity in anisometropic amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1981; 21: 467–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou F, Huang CB, Lesmes L et al. qCSF in clinical application: efficient characterization and classification of contrast sensitivity functions in amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 5365–5377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang Y, Goodfellow GW, Allison C et al. A prospective study of macular thickness in amblyopic children with unilateral high myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 2444–2449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang Y, Allison C, Frantz KA et al. A prospective pilot study of treatment outcomes for amblyopia associated with myopic anisometropia. Arch Ophthalmol 2012; 130: 579–584.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pang Y, Frantz KA, Block S et al. Effect of amblyopia treatment on macular thickness in eyes with myopic anisometropic amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015; 56: 2677–2683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck RW, Moke PS, Turpin AH et al. A computerized method of visual acuity testing: adaptation of the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol. Am J Ophthalmol 2003; 135: 194–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moke PS, Turpin AH, Beck RW et al. Computerized method of visual acuity testing: adaptation of the amblyopia treatment study visual acuity testing protocol. Am J Ophthalmol 2001; 132: 903–909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repka MX, Beck RW, Holmes JM et al. A randomized trial of patching regimens for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Arch Ophthalmol 2003; 121: 603–611.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Repka MX, Kraker RT, Beck RW et al. A randomized trial of atropine vs patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia: follow‐up at age 10 years. Arch Ophthalmol 2008; 126: 1039–1044.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes JM, Beck RW, Repka MX et al. The amblyopia treatment study visual acuity testing protocol. Arch Ophthalmol 2001; 119: 1345–1353.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hess RF, Li X, Lu G et al. The contrast dependence of the cortical fMRI deficit in amblyopia; a selective loss at higher contrasts. Hum Brain Mapp 2010; 31: 1233–1248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi DM, Mckee SP, Movshon JA. Visual deficits in anisometropia. Vision Res 2011; 51: 48–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers GL, Bremer DL, Leguire LE. The contrast sensitivity function and childhood amblyopia. Am J Ophthalmol 1987; 104: 64–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wali N, Leguire LE, Rogers GL et al. CSF interocular interactions in childhood amblyopia. Optom Vis Sci 1991; 68: 81–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung ST, Li RW, Levi DM. Identification of contrast‐defined letters benefits from perceptual learning in adults with amblyopia. Vision Res 2006; 46: 3853–3861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowal L. The contrast sensitivity function and childhood amblyopia. Am J Ophthalmol 1987; 104: 671–673.
   Google Scholar
• Smith EL III, Harwerth RS, Crawford ML. Spatial contrast sensitivity deficits in monkeys produced by optically induced anisometropia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1985; 26: 330–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zele AJ, Pokorny J, Lee DY et al. Anisometropic amblyopia: spatial contrast sensitivity deficits in inferred magnocellular and parvocellular vision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48: 3622–3631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repka MX, Kraker RT, Beck RW et al. Contrast sensitivity following amblyopia treatment in children. Arch Ophthalmol 2009; 127: 1225–1227.
   Google Scholar
• Chatzistefanou KI, Theodossiadis GP, Damanakis AG et al. Contrast sensitivity in amblyopia: the fellow eye of untreated and successfully treated amblyopes. J AAPOS 2005; 9: 468–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou F, Huang CB, Tao L et al. Training in contrast detection improves motion perception of sinewave gratings in amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 6501–6510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heng WJ, Oen FT, Peng CM. Effects of optical correction media on contrast sensitivity. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1997; 26: 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorentini A, Maffei L. Spatial contrast sensitivity of myopic subjects. Vision Res 1976; 16: 437–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oen FT, Lim TH, Chung MP. Contrast sensitivity in a large adult population. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1994; 23: 322–326.
   Google Scholar
• Kutschke PJ, Scott WE, Keech RV. Anisometropic amblyopia. Ophthalmology 1991; 98: 258–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar