Visual rehabilitation using microperimetric acoustic biofeedback training in individuals with central scotoma

REFERENCES

• Timberlake GT, Peli E, Essock EA et al. Reading with a macular scotoma. II. Retinal locus for scanning text. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987; 28: 1268–1274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan AK, Bedell HE. Functional changes at the preferred retinal locus in subjects with bilateral central vision loss. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2018; 256: 29–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellmann C, Feely M, Crossland MD et al. Fixation stability using central and pericentral fixation targets in patients with age‐related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2004; 111: 2265–2270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culham LE, Fitzke FW, Timberlake GT et al. Assessment of fixation stability in normal subjects and patients using a scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Clin Vis Sci 1993; 8: 551–561.
   Google Scholar
• Crossland MD, Culham LE, Rubin GS. Fixation stability and reading speed in patients with newly developed macular disease. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2004; 24: 327–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuchard RA. Preferred retinal loci and macular scotoma characteristics in patients with age‐related macular degeneration. Can J Ophthalmol 2005; 40: 303–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schönbach EM, Ibrahim MA, Strauss RW et al. Fixation location and stability using the MP‐1 Microperimeter in Stargardt disease: ProgStar Report No. 3. Ophthalmol Retina 2017; 1: 68–76.
   Google Scholar
• Amore FM, Fasciani R, Silvestri V et al. Relationship between fixation stability measured with MP‐1 and reading performance. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2013; 33: 611–617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossland MD, Culham LE, Kabanarou SA et al. Preferred retinal locus development in patients with macular disease. Ophthalmology 2005; 112: 1579–1585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vingolo EM, Cavarretta S, Domanico D et al. Microperimetric biofeedback in AMD patients. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 2007; 32: 185–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarita‐nistor L, González EG, Markowitz SN et al. Plasticity of fixation in patients with central vision loss. Vis Neurosci 2009; 26: 487–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vingolo EM, Salvatore S, Cavarretta S. Low‐vision rehabilitation by means of mp‐1 biofeedback examination in patients with different macular diseases: a pilot study. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 2009; 34: 127–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scuderi G, Verboschi F, Domanico D, et al. Fixation improvement through biofeedback rehabilitation in Stargardt disease. Case Rep Med 2016; 2016: 4264829.
   Google Scholar
• Pacella E, Pacella F, Mazzeo F et al. Effectiveness of vision rehabilitation treatment through MP‐1 microperimeter in patients with visual loss due to macular disease. Clin Ther 2012; 163: e423–e428.
   Google Scholar
• Vingolo EM, Salvatore S, Domanico D et al. Visual rehabilitation in patients with myopic maculopathy: our experience. Can J Ophthalmol 2013; 48: 438–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raman R, Damkondwar D, Neriyanuri S et al. Microperimetry biofeedback training in a patient with bilateral myopic macular degeneration with central scotoma. Indian J Ophthalmol 2015; 63: 534–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossland MD, Dunbar HM, Rubin GS. Fixation stability measurement using the MP1 microperimeter. Retina 2009; 29: 651–656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujii GY, de Juan E, Sunness J et al. Patient selection for macular translocation surgery using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology 2002; 109: 1737–1744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barraza‐bernal MJ, Rifai K, Wahl S. Transfer of an induced preferred retinal locus of fixation to everyday life visual tasks. J Vision 2017; 17: 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiple W, Szlyk JP, Mcmahon T et al. Eye‐movement training for reading in patients with age‐related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 2886–2896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciuffreda KJ, Goldrich SG, Neary C. Use of eye movement auditory biofeedback in the control of nystagmus. Optom Vis Sci 1982; 59: 396–409.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschen DG. Auditory feedback in the control of congenital nystagmus. Optom Vis Sci 1983; 60: 364–368.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma P, Tandon R, Kumar S et al. Reduction of congenital nystagmus amplitude with auditory biofeedback. J AAPOS 2000; 4: 287–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezawa M, Ishikawa S, Ukai K. Changes in waveform of congenital nystagmus associated with biofeedback treatment. Br J Ophthalmol 1990; 74: 472–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vingolo EM, Napolitano G, Fragiotta S. Microperimetric biofeedback training: fundamentals, strategies and perspectives. Front Biosci (Schol Ed) 2018; 10: 48–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Longhin E, Convento E, Pilotto E et al. Static and dynamic retinal fixation stability in microperimetry. Can J Ophthalmol 2013; 48: 375–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macedo AF, Nascimento SM, Gomes AO et al. Fixation in patients with juvenile macular disease. Optom Vis Sci 2007; 84: 852–858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Bittencourt MG, Sophie R et al. Fixation stability measurement using two types of microperimetry devices. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2015; 4: 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erbezci M, Ozturk T. Preferred retinal locus locations in age‐related macular degeneration. Retina 2017; https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000001897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petre KL, Hazel CA, Fine EM et al. Reading with eccentric fixation is faster in inferior visual field than in left visual field. Optom Vis Sci 2000; 77: 34–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunness JS, Applegate CA, Haselwood D et al. Fixation patterns and reading rates in eyes with central scotomas from advanced atrophic age‐related macular degeneration and Stargardt disease. Ophthalmology 1996; 103: 1458–1466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson UL. Visual rehabilitation of patients with advanced stages of glaucoma, optic atrophy, myopia or retinitis pigmentosa. Doc Ophthalmol 1988; 70: 363–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schönbach EM, Wolfson Y, Strauss RW et al. Macular sensitivity measured with microperimetry in Stargardt disease in the progression of atrophy secondary to Stargardt disease (ProgStar) study: report no. 7. JAMA Ophthalmol 2017; 135: 696–703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastasakis A, Mcanany JJ, Fishman GA et al. Clinical value, normative retinal sensitivity values, and intrasession repeatability using a combined spectral domain optical coherence tomography/scanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimeter. Eye 2011; 25: 245–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murro V, Sodi A, Giacomelli G et al. Reading ability and quality of life in Stargardt disease. Eur J Ophthalmol 2017; 27: 740–745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar