Myopia: is the nature‐nurture debate finally over?

REFERENCES

• Mark HH. Johannes Kepler on the eye and vision. Am J Ophthalmol 1971; 72: 869–878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutti DO, Zadnik K, Adams AJ. Myopia. The nature versus nurture debate goes on. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996; 37: 952–957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtin BJ. The Myopias: Basic Science and Clinical Management. New York, New York: Harper and Row, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Ding BY, Shih YF, Lin LL et al. Myopia among schoolchildren in East Asia and Singapore. Surv Ophthalmol 2017; 62: 677–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster PJ, Jiang Y. Epidemiology of myopia. Eye 2014; 28: 202–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French AN, Ashby RS, Morgan IG et al. Time outdoors and the prevention of myopia. Exp Eye Res 2013; 114: 58–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA et al. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology 2016; 123: 1036–1042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan I, Rose K. How genetic is school myopia? Prog Retin Eye Res 2005; 24: 1–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan IG, French AN, Ashby RS et al. The epidemics of myopia: aetiology and prevention. Prog Retin Eye Res 2018; 62: 134–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan IG, He M, Rose KA. Epidemic of pathological myopia: what can laboratory studies and epidemiology tell us? Retina 2017; 37: 989–997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan IG, Ohno‐matsui K, Saw SM. Myopia. Lancet 2012; 379: 1739–1748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan CW, Dirani M, Cheng CY et al. The age‐specific prevalence of myopia in Asia: a meta‐analysis. Optom Vis Sci 2015; 92: 258–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan CW, Ramamurthy D, Saw SM. Worldwide prevalence and risk factors for myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2012; 32: 3–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose KA, French AN, Morgan IG. Environmental factors and myopia: paradoxes and prospects for prevention. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol 2016; 5: 403–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sensaki S, Sabanayagam C, Verkicharla PK et al. An ecologic study of trends in the prevalence of myopia in Chinese adults in Singapore born from the 1920s to 1980s. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2017; 46: 229–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zylbermann R, Landau D, Berson D. The influence of study habits on myopia in Jewish teenagers. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1993; 30: 319–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan RW, Munro M. Refractive problems in Northern natives. Can J Ophthalmol 1973; 8: 226–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan RW, Speakman JS, Grimshaw SE. Inuit myopia: an environmentally induced "epidemic"? Can Med Assoc J 1975; 112: 575–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young FA, Leary GA, Baldwin WR et al. The transmission of refractive errors within Eskimo families. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1969; 46: 676–685.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ohno‐matsui K, Lai TY, Lai CC et al. Updates of pathologic myopia. Prog Retin Eye Res 2016; 52: 156–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon‐shaag A, Millodot M, Shneor E et al. The genetic and environmental factors for keratoconus. Biomed Res Int 2015; 2015: 795738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iribarren R. Crystalline lens and refractive development. Prog Retin Eye Res 2015; 47: 86–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojciechowski R. Nature and nurture: the complex genetics of myopia and refractive error. Clin Genet 2011; 79: 301–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young TL. Molecular genetics of human myopia: an update. Optom Vis Sci 2009; 86: E8–E22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verstraeten A, Alaerts M, Van laer L et al. Marfan syndrome and related disorders: 25 years of gene discovery. Hum Mutat 2016; 37: 524–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snead MP, Yates JR. Clinical and molecular genetics of stickler syndrome. J Med Genet 1999; 36: 353–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeitz C, Robson AG, Audo I. Congenital stationary night blindness: an analysis and update of genotype‐phenotype correlations and pathogenic mechanisms. Prog Retin Eye Res 2015; 45: 58–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flitcroft DI, Loughman J, Wildsoet CF et al. Novel myopia genes and pathways identified from syndromic forms of myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2018; 59: 338–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallman J, Winawer J. Homeostasis of eye growth and the question of myopia. Neuron 2004; 43: 447–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose KA, Morgan IG, Smith W et al. High heritability of myopia does not preclude rapid changes in prevalence. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2002; 30: 168–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohn H. The Hygiene of the Eye in Schools. London: Simpkin and Marshall, 1886.
   Google Scholar
• Adler D, Millodot M. The possible effect of undercorrection on myopic progression in children. Clin Exp Optom 2006; 89: 315–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li SY, Li SM, Zhou YH et al. Effect of undercorrection on myopia progression in 12‐year‐old children. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2015; 253: 1363–1368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasudevan B, Esposito C, Peterson C et al. Under‐correction of human myopia‐‐is it myopigenic?: a retrospective analysis of clinical refraction data. J Optom 2014; 7: 147–152.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hua WJ, Jin JX, Wu XY et al. Elevated light levels in schools have a protective effect on myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2015; 35: 252–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read SA, Collins MJ, Vincent SJ. Light exposure and eye growth in childhood. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015; 56: 6779–6787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu PC, Chen CT, Lin KK et al. Myopia prevention and outdoor light intensity in a school‐based cluster randomized trial. Ophthalmology 2018; 125: 1239–1250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobday R. Myopia and daylight in schools: a neglected aspect of public health? Perspect Public Health 2016; 136: 50–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaeffel F. Myopia‐what is old and what is new? Optom Vis Sci 2016; 93: 1022–1030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Au eong KG, Tay TH, Lim MK. Education and myopia in 110,236 young Singaporean males. Singapore Med J 1993; 34: 489–492.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Au eong KG, Tay TH, Lim MK. Race, culture and myopia in 110,236 young Singaporean males. Singapore Med J 1993; 34: 29–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koh V, Yang A, Saw SM et al. Differences in prevalence of refractive errors in young Asian males in Singapore between 1996‐1997 and 2009‐2010. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2014; 21: 247–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radhakrishnan H, Hartwig A, Charman WN et al. Accommodation response to Chinese and Latin characters in Chinese‐illiterate young adults. Clin Exp Optom 2015; 98: 527–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sourasky A. Race, sex and environment in the development of myopia. Br J Ophthalmol 1928; 12: 197–212.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cuellar‐partida G, Lu Y, Kho PF et al. Assessing the genetic predisposition of education on myopia: a mendelain randomization study. Genet Epidemiol 2016; 40: 66–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mountjoy E, Davies N, Plotnikov D et al. Education and myopia: assessing the direction of causality by mendelian randomisation. BMJ 2018; 361: k2022.
   Google Scholar
• Sorsby A, Sheridan M, Leary GA. Refraction and its Components in Twins. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Angle J, Wissmann DA. The epidemiology of myopia. Am J Epidemiol 1980; 111: 220–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saw SM, Katz J, Schein OD et al. Epidemiology of myopia. Epidemiol Rev 1996; 18: 175–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredrick DR. Myopia. BMJ 2002; 324: 1195–1199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsbirk PH. Refraction in adult West Greenland Eskimos. A population study of spherical refractive errors, including oculometric and familial correlations. Acta Ophthalmol 1979; 57: 84–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorsby A, Young FA. Transmission of refractive errors within Eskimo families. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1970; 47: 244–249.
   Google Scholar
• Young FA, Leary GA, Box RA et al. Comparison of cycloplegic and non‐cycloplegic refractions of Eskimos. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1971; 48: 814–825.
   Google Scholar
• Zadnik K, Mutti DO. Refractive error changes in law students. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1987; 64: 558–561.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woo WW, Lim LA, Yang H et al. Refractive errors in medical students in Singapore. Singapore Med J 2004; 45: 470–474.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kinge B, Midelfart A. Refractive errors among engineering students in Norway. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 1994; 1: 5–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kinge B, Midelfart A. Refractive changes among Norwegian university students‐‐a three‐year longitudinal study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1999; 77: 302–305.
   Google Scholar
• Kinge B, Midelfart A, Jacobsen G. Refractive errors among young adults and university students in Norway. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1998; 76: 692–695.
   Google Scholar
• Lin LL, Shih YF, Lee YC et al. Changes in ocular refraction and its components among medical students‐‐a 5‐year longitudinal study. Optom Vis Sci 1996; 73: 495–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guggenheim JA, Kirov G, Hodson SA. The heritability of high myopia: a reanalysis of Goldschmidt's data. J Med Genet 2000; 37: 227–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin LL, Shih YF, Hsiao CK et al. Prevalence of myopia in Taiwanese schoolchildren: 1983 to 2000. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2004; 33: 27–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saw SM. How blinding is pathological myopia? Br J Ophthalmol 2006; 90: 525–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolgin E. The myopia boom. Nature 2015; 519: 276–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirshahi A, Ponto KA, Hoehn R et al. Myopia and level of education: results from the Gutenberg Health Study. Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 2047–2052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudnicka AR, Kapetanakis VV, Wathern AK et al. Global variations and time trends in the prevalence of childhood myopia, a systematic review and quantitative meta‐analysis: implications for aetiology and early prevention. Br J Ophthalmol 2016; 100: 882–890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitale S, Sperduto RD, Ferris FL III. Increased prevalence of myopia in the United States between 1971‐1972 and 1999‐2004. Arch Ophthalmol 2009; 127: 1632–1639.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams KM, Bertelsen G, Cumberland P et al. Increasing prevalence of myopia in Europe and the impact of education. Ophthalmology 2015; 122: 1489–1497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfram C, Hohn R, Kottler U et al. Prevalence of refractive errors in the European adult population: the Gutenberg Health Study (GHS). Br J Ophthalmol 2014; 98: 857–861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond CJ, Snieder H, Gilbert CE et al. Genes and environment in refractive error: the twin eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001; 42: 1232–1236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirani M, Chamberlain M, Shekar SN et al. Heritability of refractive error and ocular biometrics: the Genes in Myopia (GEM) twin study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 4756–4761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyhne N, Sjolie AK, Kyvik KO et al. The importance of genes and environment for ocular refraction and its determiners: a population based study among 20‐45 year old twins. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85: 1470–1476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hysi PG, Young TL, Mackey DA et al. A genome‐wide association study for myopia and refractive error identifies a susceptibility locus at 15q25. Nat Genet 2010; 42: 902–905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solouki AM, Verhoeven VJ, van Duijn CM et al. A genome‐wide association study identifies a susceptibility locus for refractive errors and myopia at 15q14. Nat Genet 2010; 42: 897–901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeven VJ, Hysi PG, Wojciechowski R et al. Genome‐wide meta‐analyses of multiancestry cohorts identify multiple new susceptibility loci for refractive error and myopia. Nat Genet 2013; 45: 314–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefer AK, Tung JY, Do CB et al. Genome‐wide analysis points to roles for extracellular matrix remodeling, the visual cycle, and neuronal development in myopia. PLoS Genet 2013; 9: e1003299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tedja MS, Wojciechowski R, Hysi PG et al. Genome‐wide association meta‐analysis highlights light‐induced signaling as a driver for refractive error. Nat Genet 2018; 50: 834–848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manolio TA, Collins FS, Cox NJ et al. Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature 2009; 461: 747–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Lee SH, Goddard ME et al. GCTA: a tool for genome‐wide complex trait analysis. Am J Hum Genet 2011; 88: 76–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Benyamin B, Mcevoy BP et al. Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Nat Genet 2010; 42: 565–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trzaskowski M, Dale PS, Plomin R. No genetic influence for childhood behavior problems from DNA analysis. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2013; 52: 1048–1056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trzaskowski M, Eley TC, Davis OS et al. First genome‐wide association study on anxiety‐related behaviours in childhood. PLoS One 2013; 8: e58676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viding E, Price TS, Jaffee SR et al. Genetics of callous‐unemotional behavior in children. PLoS One 2013; 8: e65789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheesman R, Selzam S, Ronald A et al. Childhood behaviour problems show the greatest gap between DNA‐based and twin heritability. Transl Psychiatry 2017; 7: 1284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guggenheim JA, St pourcain B, Mcmahon G et al. Assumption‐free estimation of the genetic contribution to refractive error across childhood. Mol Vis 2015; 21: 621–632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimfeld K, Krapohl E, Trzaskowski M et al. Genetic influence on social outcomes during and after the Soviet era in Estonia. Nat Hum Behav 2018; 2: 269–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishna kumar S, Feldman MW, Rehkopf DH et al. Limitations of GCTA as a solution to the missing heritability problem. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016; 113: E61–E70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans LM, Tahmasbi R, Vrieze SI et al. Comparison of methods that use whole genome data to estimate the heritability and genetic architecture of complex traits. Nat Genet 2018; 50: 737–745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin N, Boomsma DOP, Machin G. A twin‐pronged attack on complex traits. Nat Genet 1997; 17: 387–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopper JL. Why “common environment effects” are so uncommon in the literature. In: Spector TD, Snieder H, Macgregor AJ, eds. Advances in Twin and Sib‐Pair Analysis. London: Greenwich Medical Media, 2000. pp. 152–163.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper JL. Heritability. In: Encyclopedia of Biostatistics. New York, New York: Wiley, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Dirani M, Shekar SN, Baird PN. The role of educational attainment in refraction: the Genes in Myopia (GEM) twin study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49: 534–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polderman TJ, Benyamin B, de Leeuw CA et al. Meta‐analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies. Nat Genet 2015; 47: 702–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French AN, Morgan IG, Mitchell P et al. Patterns of myopigenic activities with age, gender and ethnicity in Sydney schoolchildren. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2013; 33: 318–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visscher PM, Hill WG, Wray NR. Heritability in the genomics era‐‐concepts and misconceptions. Nat Rev Genet 2008; 9: 255–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CY, Scurrah KJ, Stankovich J et al. Heritability and shared environment estimates for myopia and associated ocular biometric traits: the Genes in Myopia (GEM) family study. Hum Genet 2007; 121: 511–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guggenheim JA, Pong‐wong R, Haley CS et al. Correlations in refractive errors between siblings in the Singapore Cohort Study of Risk factors for Myopia. Br J Ophthalmol 2007; 91: 781–784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes MC, Andrew T, Carbonaro F et al. Estimating heritability and shared environmental effects for refractive error in twin and family studies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009; 50: 126–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risch N. Dissecting racial and ethnic differences. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 408–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auton A, Brooks LD, Durbin RM et al. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature 2015; 526: 68–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin MP, Siong KH, Chan KH et al. Prevalence of visual impairment and refractive errors among different ethnic groups in schoolchildren in Turpan, China. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2015; 35: 263–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo K, Yang DY, Wang Y et al. Prevalence of myopia in schoolchildren in Ejina: the Gobi Desert Children Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015; 56: 1769–1774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He M, Huang W, Zheng Y et al. Refractive error and visual impairment in school children in rural southern China. Ophthalmology 2007; 114: 374–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He M, Zeng J, Liu Y et al. Refractive error and visual impairment in urban children in southern China. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: 793–799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He M, Zheng Y, Xiang F. Prevalence of myopia in urban and rural children in mainland China. Optom Vis Sci 2009; 86: 40–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li SM, Liu LR, Li SY et al. Design, methodology and baseline data of a school‐based cohort study in Central China: the Anyang Childhood Eye Study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2013; 20: 348–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Xu K, Wu S et al. Population‐based survey of refractive error among school‐aged children in rural northern China: the Heilongjiang eye study. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2014; 42: 379–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan CW, Wu RK, Li J et al. Low prevalence of myopia among school children in rural China. BMC Ophthalmol 2018; 18: 140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pi LH, Chen L, Liu Q et al. Refractive status and prevalence of refractive errors in suburban school‐age children. Int J Med Sci 2010; 7: 342–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian YS, Chu RY, He JC et al. Incidence of myopia in high school students with and without red‐green color vision deficiency. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009; 50: 1598–1605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma A, Congdon N, Gao Y et al. Height, stunting, and refractive error among rural Chinese schoolchildren: the See Well to Learn Well project. Am J Ophthalmol 2010; 149: 347–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun HP, Li A, Xu Y et al. Secular trends of reduced visual acuity from 1985 to 2010 and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2030 among primary and secondary school students in China. JAMA Ophthalmol 2015; 133: 262–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu JF, Bi HS, Wang SM et al. Refractive error, visual acuity and causes of vision loss in children in Shandong, China. The Shandong Children Eye Study. PLoS One 2013; 8: e82763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang F, He M, Zeng Y et al. Increases in the prevalence of reduced visual acuity and myopia in Chinese children in Guangzhou over the past 20 years. Eye 2013; 27: 1353–1358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You QS, Wu LJ, Duan JL et al. Prevalence of myopia in school children in greater Beijing: the Beijing Childhood Eye Study. Acta Ophthalmol 2014; 92: e398–e406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Li L, Chen L et al. Population density and refractive error among Chinese children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 4969–4976.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao J, Pan X, Sui R et al. Refractive error study in children: results from Shunyi District, China. Am J Ophthalmol 2000; 129: 427–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dandona R, Dandona L, Srinivas M et al. Population‐based assessment of refractive error in India: the Andhra Pradesh eye disease study. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2002; 30: 84–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dandona R, Dandona L, Srinivas M et al. Refractive error in children in a rural population in India. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 615–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murthy GV, Gupta SK, Ellwein LB et al. Refractive error in children in an urban population in New Delhi. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 623–631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pokharel GP, Negrel AD, Munoz SR et al. Refractive error study in children: results from Mechi Zone, Nepal. Am J Ophthalmol 2000; 129: 436–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxena R, Vashist P, Tandon R et al. Prevalence of myopia and its risk factors in urban school children in Delhi: the North India Myopia Study (NIM Study). PLoS One 2015; 10: e0117349.
   Google Scholar
• Logan NS, Davies LN, Mallen EA et al. Ametropia and ocular biometry in a U.K. university student population. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 261–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan NS, Shah P, Rudnicka AR et al. Childhood ethnic differences in ametropia and ocular biometry: the Aston Eye Study. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2011; 31: 550–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudnicka AR, Owen CG, Nightingale CM et al. Ethnic differences in the prevalence of myopia and ocular biometry in 10‐ and 11‐year‐old children: the Child Heart and Health Study in England (CHASE). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 6270–6276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ip JM, Huynh SC, Robaei D et al. Ethnic differences in refraction and ocular biometry in a population‐based sample of 11‐15‐year‐old Australian children. Eye 2008; 22: 649–656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu HM, Seet B, Yap EP et al. Does education explain ethnic differences in myopia prevalence? A population‐based study of young adult males in Singapore. Optom Vis Sci 2001; 78: 234–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh PP, Abqariyah Y, Pokharel GP et al. Refractive error and visual impairment in school‐age children in Gombak District, Malaysia. Ophthalmology 2005; 112: 678–685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner LF, Meng CK, Grosvenor TP et al. Ocular dimensions and refractive power in Malay and Melanesian children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1990; 10: 234–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirani M, Tong L, Gazzard G et al. Outdoor activity and myopia in Singapore teenage children. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93: 997–1000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards MH. Effect of parental myopia on the development of myopia in Hong Kong Chinese. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1998; 18: 477–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ip JM, Huynh SC, Robaei D et al. Ethnic differences in the impact of parental myopia: findings from a population‐based study of 12‐year‐old Australian children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48: 2520–2528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacella R, Mclellan J, Grice K et al. Role of genetic factors in the etiology of juvenile‐onset myopia based on a longitudinal study of refractive error. Optom Vis Sci 1999; 76: 381–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang F, He M, Morgan IG. The impact of parental myopia on myopia in Chinese children: population‐based evidence. Optom Vis Sci 2012; 89: 1487–1496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang F, He M, Morgan IG. The impact of severity of parental myopia on myopia in Chinese children. Optom Vis Sci 2012; 89: 884–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones LA, Sinnott LT, Mutti DO et al. Parental history of myopia, sports and outdoor activities, and future myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48: 3524–3532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbani mojarrad N, Williams C, Guggenheim JA. A genetic risk score and number of myopic parents independently predict myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2018; doi: 10.1111/opo.12579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrin LA, Sajjadi A, Benoit JS. Objectively measured light exposure during school and summer in children. Optom Vis Sci 2018; 95: 332–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojciechowski R, Cheng CY. Involvement of multiple molecular pathways in the genetics of ocular refraction and myopia. Retina 2018; 38: 91–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hysi PG, Wojciechowski R, Rahi JS et al. Genome‐wide association studies of refractive error and myopia, lessons learned, and implications for the future. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014; 55: 3344–3351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attebo K, Ivers RQ, Mitchell P. Refractive errors in an older population: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology 1999; 106: 1066–1072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong TY, Foster PJ, Hee J et al. Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in adult Chinese in Singapore. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41: 2486–2494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose KA, Morgan IG, Smith W et al. Myopia, lifestyle, and schooling in students of Chinese ethnicity in Singapore and Sydney. Arch Ophthalmol 2008; 126: 527–530.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• French AN, Morgan IG, Burlutsky G et al. Prevalence and 5‐ to 6‐year incidence of myopia and hyperopia in Australian schoolchildren. Ophthalmology 2013; 120: 1482–1491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeven VJ, Buitendijk GH, Rivadeneira F et al. Education influences the role of genetics in myopia. Eur J Epidemiol 2013; 12: 973–980.
   Google Scholar
• Cortina‐borja M, Smith AD, Combarros O et al. The synergy factor: a statistic to measure interactions in complex diseases. BMC Res Notes 2009; 2: 105.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tkatchenko AV, Tkatchenko TV, Guggenheim JA et al. APLP2 regulates refractive error and myopia development in mice and humans. PLoS Genet 2015; 11: e1005432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan Q, Guo X, Tideman JW et al. Childhood gene‐environment interactions and age‐dependent effects of genetic variants associated with refractive error and myopia: the CREAM consortium. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 25853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan Q, Verhoeven VJ, Wojciechowski R et al. Meta‐analysis of gene‐environment‐wide association scans accounting for education level identifies additional loci for refractive error. Nat Commun 2016; 7: 11008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan Q, Wojciechowski R, Kamran ikram M et al. Education influences the association between genetic variants and refractive error: a meta‐analysis of five Singapore studies. Hum Mol Genet 2014; 23: 546–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordain L, Eaton SB, Brand miller J et al. An evolutionary analysis of the aetiology and pathogenesis of juvenile‐onset myopia. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2002; 80: 125–135.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Casson RJ, Kahawita S, Kong A et al. Exceptionally low prevalence of refractive error and visual impairment in schoolchildren from Lao People's Democratic Republic. Ophthalmology 2012; 119: 2021–2027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Z, Meng N, Muecke J et al. Refractive error in school children in an urban and rural setting in Cambodia. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2012; 19: 16–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chew SJ, Chia SC, Lee LK. The pattern of myopia in young Singaporean men. Singapore Med J 1988; 29: 201–211.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wong TY, Foster PJ, Johnson GJ et al. Education, socioeconomic status, and ocular dimensions in Chinese adults: the Tanjong Pagar Survey. Br J Ophthalmol 2002; 86: 963–968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leone JF, Mitchell P, Morgan IG et al. Use of visual acuity to screen for significant refractive errors in adolescents. Arch Ophthalmol 2010; 128: 894–899.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parssinen O, Lyyra AL. Myopia and myopic progression among schoolchildren: a three‐year follow‐up study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993; 34: 2794–2802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose KA, Morgan IG, Ip J et al. Outdoor activity reduces the prevalence of myopia in children. Ophthalmology 2008; 115: 1279–1285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He M, Xiang F, Zeng Y et al. Effect of time spent outdoors at school on the development of myopia among children in China: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015; 314: 1142–1148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu PC, Tsai CL, Wu HL et al. Outdoor activity during class recess reduces myopia onset and progression in school children. Ophthalmology 2013; 120: 1080–1085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashby R, Ohlendorf A, Schaeffel F. The effect of ambient illuminance on the development of deprivation myopia in chicks. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009; 50: 5348–5354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashby RS, Schaeffel F. The effect of bright light on lens compensation in chicks. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 5247–5253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith EL III, Hung LF, Arumugam B et al. Negative lens‐induced myopia in infant monkeys: effects of high ambient lighting. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013; 54: 2959–2569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith EL III, Hung LF, Huang J. Protective effects of high ambient lighting on the development of form‐deprivation myopia in rhesus monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012; 53: 421–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karouta C, Ashby RS. Correlation between light levels and the development of deprivation myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015; 56: 299–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez AA, Wildsoet CF. Quantifying light exposure patterns in young adult students. J Mod Opt 2013; 60: 1200–1208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen LB, Lan WZ, Li XN et al. Accuracy and stability of Clouclip™, a novel device to record myopic environmental risks. Chin J Optom Ophthalmol 2017; 19: 198–205.
   Google Scholar
• Guggenheim JA, Mcmahon G, Northstone K et al. Birth order and myopia. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2013; 20: 375–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan IG, Cotch MF. Birth order and myopia: what are the messages to readers? Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2013; 20: 333–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guggenheim JA, Williams C, UK Biobank Eye and Vision Consortium. Role of educational exposure in the association between myopia and birth order. JAMA Ophthalmol 2015; 133: 1408–1414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao L, Zhou M. Do only children have poor vision? Evidence from China's one‐child policy. Health Econ 2018; 27: 1131–1146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuellar‐partida G, Williams KM, Yazar S et al. Genetically low vitamin D concentrations and myopic refractive error: a Mendelian randomization study. Int J Epidemiol 2017; 46: 1882–1890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guggenheim JA, Williams C, Northstone K et al. Does vitamin D mediate the protective effects of time outdoors on myopia? Findings from a prospective birth cohort. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014; 55: 8550–8558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadnik K, Sinnott LT, Cotter SA et al. Prediction of juvenile‐onset myopia. JAMA Ophthalmol 2015; 133: 683–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guggenheim JA, Ghorbani mojarrad N, Williams C et al. Genetic prediction of myopia: prospects and challenges. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2017; 37: 549–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan IG. The biological basis of myopic refractive error. Clin Exp Optom 2003; 86: 276–288.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schaeffel F, Feldkaemper M. Animal models in myopia research. Clin Exp Optom 2015; 98: 7–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone RA, Pardue MT, Iuvone PM et al. Pharmacology of myopia and potential role for intrinsic retinal circadian rhythms. Exp Eye Res 2013; 114: 35–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kothmann WW, Massey SC, O'brien J. Dopamine‐stimulated dephosphorylation of connexin 36 mediates AII amacrine cell uncoupling. J Neurosci 2009; 29: 14903–14911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chia A, Lu QS, Tan D. Five‐year clinical trial on atropine for the treatment of myopia 2: myopia control with atropine 0.01 per cent eyedrops. Ophthalmology 2016; 123: 391–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho P, Cheung SW. Protective role of orthokeratology in reducing risk of rapid axial elongation: a reanalysis of data from the ROMIO and TO‐SEE studies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2017; 58: 1411–1416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aller TA, Liu M, Wildsoet CF. Myopia control with bifocal contact lenses: a randomized clinical trial. Optom Vis Sci 2016; 93: 344–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam CS, Tang WC, Tse DY et al. Defocus incorporated soft contact (DISC) lens slows myopia progression in Hong Kong Chinese schoolchildren: a 2‐year randomised clinical trial. Br J Ophthalmol 2014; 98: 40–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith EL III. Prentice award lecture 2010: a case for peripheral optical treatment strategies for myopia. Optom Vis Sci 2011; 88: 1029–1044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar