Impact of image averaging on wide‐field choroidal thickness measurements using enhanced‐depth imaging optical coherence tomography

REFERENCES

• Regatieri CV, Branchini L, Fujimoto JG et al. Choroidal imaging using spectral‐domain optical coherence tomography. Retina 2012; 32: 865–876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JY, Kim BG, Hwang JH et al. Choroidal thickness in and outside of vascular arcade in healthy eyes using spectral‐domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2017; 58: 5827–5837.
   Google Scholar
• Mohler KJ, Draxinger W, Klein T et al. Combined 60° wide‐field choroidal thickness maps and high‐definition en face vasculature visualization using swept‐source megahertz OCT at 1050 nm. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015; 56: 6284–6293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoseini‐yazdi H, Vincent S, Collins MJ et al. Wide‐field choroidal thickness in myopes and emmetropes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2017; 58: 1108.
   Google Scholar
• Pang CE, Shah VP, Sarraf D et al. Ultra‐widefield imaging with autofluorescence and indocyanine green angiography in central serous chorioretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 2014; 158: 362–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Tatham AJ, Medeiros FA et al. Assessment of choroidal thickness in healthy and glaucomatous eyes using swept source optical coherence tomography. PLoS One 2014; 9: e109683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso‐caneiro D, Read SA, Collins MJ. Speckle reduction in optical coherence tomography imaging by affine‐motion image registration. J Biomed Opt 2011; 16: 116027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirasawa M, Sakamoto T, Terasaki H et al. Objective determination of optimal number of spectral‐domain optical coherence tomographic images of retina to average. PloS One 2014; 9: e110550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu W, Tan O, Pappuru RR et al. Assessment of frame‐averaging algorithms in OCT image analysis. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2013; 44: 168–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podkowinski D, Sharian varnousfaderani E, Simader C et al. Impact of B‐scan averaging on Spectralis optical coherence tomography image quality before and after cataract surgery. J Ophthalmol 2017; 2017: 8148047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakamoto A, Hangai M, Yoshimura N. Spectral‐domain optical coherence tomography with multiple B‐scan averaging for enhanced imaging of retinal diseases. Ophthalmology 2008; 115: 1071–1078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El‐shazly A, Farweez Y, Elzankalony YA et al. Effect of smoking on macular function and structure in active smokers versus passive smokers. Retina 2017; 38: 1031–1040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vural AD, Kara N, Sayin N et al. Choroidal thickness changes after a single administration of coffee in healthy subjects. Retina 2014; 34: 1223–1228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang HM, Woo YJ, Koh HJ et al. The effect of consumption of ethanol on subfoveal choroidal thickness in acute phase. Br J Ophthalmol 2016; 100: 383–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Xue F, Zhou J et al. Effects of orthokeratology on choroidal thickness and axial length. Optom Vis Sci 2016; 93: 1064–1071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Zhou Y, Xie Z et al. The effect of topical atropine on the choroidal thickness of healthy children. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 34936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodman‐pieterse EC, Read SA, Collins MJ et al. Regional changes in choroidal thickness associated with accommodation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015; 56: 6414–6422.
   Google Scholar
• Read SA, Collins MJ. The short‐term influence of exercise on axial length and intraocular pressure. Eye 2011; 25: 767–774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read SA. Ocular and environmental factors associated with eye growth in childhood. Optom Vis Sci 2016; 93: 1031–1041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read SA, Collins MJ, Vincent SJ et al. Choroidal thickness in myopic and nonmyopic children assessed with enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013; 54: 7578–7586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso‐caneiro D, Read SA, Collins MJ. Automatic segmentation of choroidal thickness in optical coherence tomography. Biomed Opt Express 2013; 4: 2795–2812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read SA, Collins MJ, Vincent SJ et al. Choroidal thickness in childhood. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013; 54: 3586–3593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girard MJ, Strouthidis NG, Ethier CR et al. Shadow removal and contrast enhancement in optical coherence tomography images of the human optic nerve head. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 7738–7748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones SE, Buchbinder BR, Aharon I. Three‐dimensional mapping of cortical thickness using Laplace’s equation. Hum Brain Mapp 2000; 11: 12–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso‐caneiro D, Read SA, Vincent SJ et al. Tissue thickness calculation in ocular optical coherence tomography. Biomed Opt Express 2016; 7: 629–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carkeet A. Exact parametric confidence intervals for Bland‐Altman limits of agreement. Optom Vis Sci 2015; 92: e71–e80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM. What is the Standard Error of the within‐Subject Standard Deviation, sw? 2011. Available at: https://www-users.york.ac.uk/~mb55/meas/seofsw.htm
   Google Scholar
• Chhablani J, Barteselli G, Bartsch D‐U et al. Influence of scanning density on macular choroidal volume measurement using spectral‐domain optical coherence tomography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2013; 251: 1303–1309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philip A‐M, Gerendas BS, Zhang L et al. Choroidal thickness maps from spectral domain and swept source optical coherence tomography: algorithmic versus ground truth annotation. Br J Ophthalmol 2016; 100: 1372–1376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giani A, Deiro AP, Staurenghi G. Repeatability and reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements with spectral‐domain optical coherence tomography using different scan parameters. Retina 2012; 32: 1007–1012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho A, Choi Y, Kim Y. Influence of choroidal thickness on subfoveal choroidal thickness measurement repeatability using enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography. Eye 2014; 28: 1151–1160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamashita T, Yamashita T, Shirasawa M et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of subfoveal choroidal thickness in normal eyes of Japanese using different SD‐OCT devices. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012; 53: 1102–1107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta P, Jing T, Marziliano P et al. Distribution and determinants of choroidal thickness and volume using automated segmentation software in a population‐based study. Am J Ophthalmol 2015; 159: 293–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansouri K, Medeiros FA, Tatham AJ et al. Evaluation of retinal and choroidal thickness by swept‐source optical coherence tomography: repeatability and assessment of artifacts. Am J Ophthalmol 2014; 157: 1022–1032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read SA, Alonso‐caneiro D, Vincent SJ et al. Longitudinal changes in choroidal thickness and eye growth in childhood. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015; 56: 3103–3112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Twa MD, Schulle KL, Chiu SJ et al. Validation of macular choroidal thickness measurements from automated SD‐OCT image segmentation. Optom Vis Sci 2016; 93: 1387–1398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman W, Chen FK, Yeoh J et al. Repeatability of manual subfoveal choroidal thickness measurements in healthy subjects using the technique of enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 2267–2271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Robert YC et al. Ocular pulse amplitude in healthy subjects as measured by dynamic contour tonometry. Arch Ophthalmol 2006; 124: 1104–1108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Butt Z, O’brien C. Reproducibility of pulsatile ocular blood flow measurements. J Glaucoma 1995; 4: 214–218.
   Google Scholar
• Uji A, Balasubramanian S, Lei J et al. Impact of multiple En face image averaging on quantitative assessment from optical coherence tomography angiography images. Ophthalmology 2017; 124: 944–952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar