Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with standard ultrasonic pachymetry and optical devices

REFERENCES

• Doughty MJ, Zaman ML. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta‐analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol 2000; 44: 367–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price FW Jr, Koller DL, Price MO. Central corneal pachymetry in patients under going laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology 1999; 106: 2216–2220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarışın E, Kevser MA, Eren H et al. Ultrasonik Pakimetri ile Kornea Kalınlıklarının Ölçümü. T Oft Gaz 1992; 22: 441.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg L. The Aviso A/B: clarity with digital imaging. 2010. [Cited 1 Dec 2018.] Available at: https://www.quantel‐medical.com/upload/products/product‐3/download‐file‐en‐claritywithdigitalimaging‐1418295243.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Milla M, Piñero DP, Amparo F et al. Pachymetric measurements with a new Scheimpflug photography‐based system: intraobserver repeatability and agreement with optical coherence tomography pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37: 310–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khaja WA, Grover S, Kelmenson AT et al. Comparison of central corneal thickness: ultrasound pachymetry versus slit‐lamp optical coherence tomography, specular microscopy, and Orbscan. Clin Ophthalmol 2015; 12: 1065–1070.
   Google Scholar
• Huang J, Savini G, Li J et al. Evaluation of a new optical biometry device for measurements of ocular components and its comparison with IOLMaster. Br J Ophthalmol 2014; 98: 1277–1281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swartz T, Marten L, Wang M. Measuring the cornea: the latest developments in corneal topography. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2007; 18: 325–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrer K, Frueh BE, Wälti R et al. Comparison and evaluation of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low‐coherence reflectometer. Ophthalmology 2009; 116: 2087–2092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao HL, Kumar AU, Kumar A et al. Evaluation of central corneal thickness measurement with RTVue spectral domain optical coherence tomography in normal subjects. Cornea 2011; 30: 121–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishibazawa A, Igarashi S, Hanada K et al. Central corneal thickness measurements with Fourier‐domain optical coherence tomography versus ultrasonic pachymetry and rotating Scheimpflug camera. Cornea 2011; 30: 615–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grewal DS, Brar GS, Grewal SP. Assessment of central corneal thickness in normal, keratoconus and post laser in situ keratomileusis eyes using Scheimpflug imaging, spectral domain optical coherence tomography, and ultrasound pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36: 954–964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao PS, Wong TY, Wong WL et al. Comparision of central corneal thickness measurements by Visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography with ultrasound pachymetry. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 143: 1047–1049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amano S, Honda N, Amano Y et al. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by rotating Scheimpflug camera, ultrasonic pachymetry, and scanning‐slit corneal topography. Ophthalmology 2006; 113: 937–941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponce PCM, Rocha KM, Smith SD et al. Central and peripheral corneal thickness measured with optical coherence tomography, Scheimpflug imaging, and ultrasound pachymetry in normal, keratoconus‐suspect, and post‐laser in situ keratomileusis eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009; 35: 1055–1062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayhan HA, Aslan bayhan S, Can I. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with three new optical devices and a standard ultrasonic pachymeter. Int J Ophthalmol 2014; 18: 302–308.
   Google Scholar
• Kim HY, Budenz DL, Lee PS et al. Comparison of central corneal thickness using anterior segment opticalcoherencetomography vs ultrasound pachymetry. Am J Ophthalmol 2008; 145: 228–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissen J, Hjordal JO, Ehlers NA. Clinical comparison of optical and ultrasonic pachymetry. Acta Ophthalmol 1991; 69: 659–663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao L, Fan H, Cheng AC et al. The effects of eye drops on corneal thickness in adult myopia. Cornea 2006; 25: 404–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishman GR, Pons ME, Seedor JA et al. Assessment of central corneal thickness using optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31: 707–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çağlar Ç, Kocamış Sİ, Demir E et al. Comparison of the measurements of a novel optical biometry: Nidek AL‐Scan with Sirius and a ultrasound biometry. Int Ophthalmol 2017; 37: 491–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang JY, Pekmezci M, Yaplee S et al. Intra‐examiner repeatability and agreement of corneal pachymetry map measurement by time‐domain and Fourier‐domain optical coherence tomography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2010; 248: 1647–1656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsich MW, Bullimore MA. The repeatability of corneal thickness measures. Cornea 2000; 19: 792–795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar