The effect of cycloplegia on biometric measurements using swept‐source optical coherence tomography‐based biometry

REFERENCES

• Montés‐micó R, Carones F, Buttacchio A et al. Comparison of immersion ultrasound, partial coherence interferometry, and low coherence reflectometry for ocular biometry in cataract patients. J Refract Surg 2011; 27: 665–671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kongsap P. Comparison of a new optical biometer and a standard biometer in cataract patients. Eye Vis (Lond) 2016; 3: 27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaswin G, Rousseau A, Mgarrech M et al. Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation results with a new optical biometry device: comparison with the gold standard. J Cataract Refract Surg 2014; 40: 593–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez‐raton A, Jimenez‐alvarez M, Arteche‐limousin L et al. Effect of pupil dilation on biometry measurements with partial coherence interferometry and its effect on IOL power formula calculation. Eur J Ophthalmol 2015; 25: 309–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakbak B, Koktekir BE, Gedik S et al. The effect of pupil dilation on biometric parameters of the Lenstar 900. Cornea 2013; 32: e21–e24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Mc alinden C, Su B et al. The effect of cycloplegia on the Lenstar and the IOLMaster biometry. Optom Vis Sci 2012; 89: 1691–1696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdani N, Sadeghi R, Momeni‐moghaddam H et al. Comparison of cyclopentolate versus tropicamide cycloplegia: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Optom 2018; 11: 135–143.
   Google Scholar
• Arriola‐villalobos P, Almendral gomez J, Garzon N et al. Effect of pharmacological pupil dilation on measurements and IOL power calculation made using the new swept‐source optical coherence tomography‐based optical biometer. J Fr Ophthalmol 2016; 39: 859–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcalinden C, Khadka J, Pesudovs K. Statistical methods for conducting agreement (comparison of clinical tests) and precision (repeatability or reproducibility studies in optometry and ophthalmology). Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2011; 31: 330–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grulkowski I, Liu J, Zhang J et al. Reproducibility of a longrange swept‐source optical coherence tomography ocular biometry system and comparison with clinical biometers. Ophthalmology 2013; 120: 2184–2190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivannaboon S, Chirapapaisan C, Chonpimai P et al. Clinical comparison of a new swept‐source optical coherence tomography–based optical biometer and a time‐domain optical coherence tomography–based optical biometer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2015; 41: 2224–2232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akman A, Asena L, Gungor SG. Evaluation and comparison of the new swept‐source OCT‐based IOLMaster 700 with the IOLMaster 500. Br J Ophthalmol 2016; 100: 1201–1205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler G, Shahar J, Kesner R et al. Effect of pupil size on biometry measurements using the IOLMaster. Am J Ophthalmol 2015; 159: 940–944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurian M, Negalnur N, Das S et al. Biometry with a new swept‐source optical coherence tomography biometer: repeatability and agreement with an optical low‐coherence reflectometry device. J Cataract Refract Surg 2016; 42: 577–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrer‐blasco T, Dominguez‐vicent A, Esteve‐taboada JJ et al. Evaluation of the repeatability of a swept‐source ocular biometer for measuring ocular biometer parameters. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2017; 255: 343–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higashiyama T, Iwasa M, Ohji M. Changes in the anterior segment after cycloplegia with a biometer using swept‐source optical coherence tomography. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0183378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan Y, Zhang Z, Zhu J et al. Responses of the ocular anterior segment and refraction to 0.5% Tropicamide in Chinese school‐aged children of myopia, emmetropia, and hyperopia. J Ophthalmol 2015; 2015: 612728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrer‐blasco T, Esteve‐taboada JJ, Monsálvez‐romín D et al. Ocular biometric changes with different accomodative stimuli using swept‐source optical coherence tomography. Int Ophthalmol 2017; 19: 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng Y, Gao JH. Effects of Mydrin eye‐drops on central corneal thickness values in adult patients with myopia. Clin Exp Optom 2017; 100: 151–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domínguez‐vicent A, Pérez‐vives C, Ferrer‐blasco T et al. Interchangeability among five devices that measure anterior eye distances. Clin Exp Optom 2015; 98: 254–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar