REFERENCES
- Johnson RD, Nguyen MT, Lee N et al. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, forme fruste keratoconus, and manifest keratoconus after statistical correction for potentially confounding factors. Cornea 2011; 30: 516–523.
- Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31: 156–162.
- Park JH, Jun RM, Choi KR. Significance of corneal biomechanical properties in patients with progressive normal‐tension glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 2015; 99: 746–751.
- Hashemi H, Yekta A, Jafarzadehpur E et al. The prevalence of strabismus in 7‐year‐old schoolchildren in Iran. Strabismus 2015; 23: 1–7.
- Spoerl E, Terai N, Scholz F et al. Detection of biomechanical changes after corneal cross‐linking using ocular response analyzer software. J Refract Surg 2011; 27: 452–457.
- Girard MJ, Dupps WJ, Baskaran M et al. Translating ocular biomechanics into clinical practice: current state and future prospects. Curr Eye Res 2015; 40: 1–18.
- Hashemi H, Jafarzadehpur E, Mehravaran S et al. Corneal resistance factor and corneal hysteresis in a 6‐ to 18‐year‐old population. J Cataract Refract Surg 2014; 40: 1446–1453.
- Wang D, Liu M, Chen Y et al. Differences in the corneal biomechanical changes after SMILE and LASIK. J Refract Surg 2014; 30: 702–707.
- Tian Y, Tarrant J, Wildsoet CF. Optical and biometric characteristics of anisomyopia in human adults. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2011; 31: 540–549.
- Bueno‐gimeno I, Espana‐gregori E, Gene‐sampedro A et al. Relationship among corneal biomechanics, refractive error, and axial length. Optom Vis Sci 2014; 91: 507–513.
- Chang PY, Chang SW, Wang JY. Assessment of corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure with the Ocular Response Analyzer in childhood myopia. Br J Ophthalmol 2010; 94: 877–881.
- Song Y, Congdon N, Li L et al. Corneal hysteresis and axial length among Chinese secondary school children: the Xichang Pediatric Refractive Error Study (X‐PRES) report no. 4. Am J Ophthalmol 2008; 145: 819–826.
- Lim L, Gazzard G, Chan YH et al. Cornea biomechanical characteristics and their correlates with refractive error in Singaporean children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49: 3852–3857.
- Chang SW, Tsai IL, Hu FR et al. The cornea in young myopic adults. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85: 916–920.
- Shen L, You QS, Xu X et al. Scleral and choroidal thickness in secondary high axial myopia. Retina 2016; 36: 1579–1585.
- Bueno‐gimeno I, Gene‐sampedro A, Pinero‐llorens DP et al. Corneal biomechanics, retinal nerve fiber layer, and optic disc in children. Optom Vis Sci 2014; 91: 1474–1482.
- Xu S, Xu A, Tao A et al. Corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure in high myopic anisometropia. Eye Contact Lens 2010; 36: 204–209.
- Shah A, Lascaratos G, Garway‐heath DF et al. Longitudinal study of iris concavity, corneal biomechanics, and correlations to ocular biometry in a cohort of 10‐ to 12‐year‐old UK schoolboys: 2‐year follow‐up data. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014; 55: 4645–4650.
- Daxer A, Misof K, Grabner B et al. Collagen fibrils in the human corneal stroma: structure and aging. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998; 39: 644–648.
- Daxer A. Age‐related corneal biomechanical changes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34: 715.
- Terai N, Raiskup F, Haustein M et al. Identification of biomechanical properties of the cornea: the ocular response analyzer. Curr Eye Res 2012; 37: 553–562.
- Kirwan C, O'keefe M, Lanigan B. Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement in children using the reichert ocular response analyzer. Am J Ophthalmol 2006; 142: 990–992.
- Celebi ARC, Kilavuzoglu AE, Altiparmak UE et al. Age‐related change in corneal biomechanical parameters in a healthy Caucasian population. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2018; 25: 55–62.
- Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Ohmoto F. Effect of aging on corneal biomechanical parameters using the ocular response analyzer. J Refract Surg 2009; 25: 888–893.
- Ortiz D, Pinero D, Shabayek MH et al. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post‐laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33: 1371–1375.
- Fontes BM, Ambrosio R Jr, Alonso RS et al. Corneal biomechanical metrics in eyes with refraction of −19.00 to +9.00 D in healthy Brazilian patients. J Refract Surg 2008; 24: 941–945.
- Foster PJ, Broadway DC, Garway‐heath DF et al. Intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanics in an adult British population: the EPIC‐Norfolk eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 8179–8185.
- Franco S, Lira M. Biomechanical properties of the cornea measured by the ocular response analyzer and their association with intraocular pressure and the central corneal curvature. Clin Exp Optom 2009; 92: 469–475.
- Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Iribarren R et al. Five‐year change in refraction and its ocular components in the 40‐ to 64‐year‐old population of the Shahroud eye cohort study. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2016; 44: 669–677.
- Kerautret J, Colin J, Touboul D et al. Biomechanical characteristics of the ectatic cornea. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34: 510–513.
- Zarei‐ghanavati S, Ramirez‐miranda A, Yu F et al. Corneal deformation signal waveform analysis in keratoconic versus post‐femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis eyes after statistical correction for potentially confounding factors. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012; 38: 607–614.