Repeatability of wide‐field choroidal thickness measurements using enhanced‐depth imaging optical coherence tomography

REFERENCES

• Read SA. Ocular and environmental factors associated with eye growth in childhood. Optom Vis Sci 2016; 93: 1031–1041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read SA, Alonso‐caneiro D, Vincent SJ et al. Longitudinal changes in choroidal thickness and eye growth in childhood. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015; 56: 3103–3112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Read SA, Alonso‐caneiro D, Vincent SJ et al. Peripapillary choroidal thickness in childhood. Exp Eye Res 2015; 135: 164–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read SA, Collins MJ, Vincent SJ et al. Choroidal thickness in myopic and nonmyopic children assessed with enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013; 54: 7578–7586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez‐cano A, Orduna E, Segura F et al. Choroidal thickness and volume in healthy young white adults and the relationships between them and axial length, ammetropy and sex. Am J Ophthalmol 2014; 158: 574–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoseini‐yazdi H, Vincent S, Collins MJ et al. Wide‐field choroidal thickness in myopes and emmetropes. Sci Rep 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39653-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohler KJ, Draxinger W, Klein T et al. Combined 60° wide‐field choroidal thickness maps and high‐definition en face vasculature visualization using swept‐source megahertz OCT at 1050 nm. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015; 56: 6284–6293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang CE, Shah VP, Sarraf D et al. Ultra‐widefield imaging with autofluorescence and indocyanine green angiography in central serous chorioretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 2014; 158: 362–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Tatham AJ, Medeiros FA et al. Assessment of choroidal thickness in healthy and glaucomatous eyes using swept source optical coherence tomography. PLoS One 2014; 9: e109683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman W, Chen FK, Yeoh J et al. Repeatability of manual subfoveal choroidal thickness measurements in healthy subjects using the technique of enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 2267–2271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaca EE, Özdek Ş, Yalçin NG et al. Reproducibility of choroidal thickness measurements in healthy Turkish subjects. Eur J Ophthalmol 2013; 24: 202–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuong VS, Moisseiev E, Cunefare D et al. Repeatability of choroidal thickness measurements on enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography using different posterior boundaries. Am J Ophthalmol 2016; 169: 104–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen FK, Yeoh J, Rahman W et al. Topographic variation and interocular symmetry of macular choroidal thickness using enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012; 53: 975–985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty R, Read SA, Collins MJ. Diurnal variations in axial length, choroidal thickness, intraocular pressure, and ocular biometrics. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 5121–5129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Robert YC et al. Ocular pulse amplitude in healthy subjects as measured by dynamic contour tonometry. Arch Ophthalmol 2006; 124: 1104–1108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sander BP, Collins MJ, Read SA. The effect of topical adrenergic and anticholinergic agents on the choroidal thickness of young healthy adults. Exp Eye Res 2014; 128: 181–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulaş F, Doğan Ü, Duran B et al. Choroidal thickness changes during the menstrual cycle. Curr Eye Res 2013; 38: 1172–1181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamashita T, Yamashita T, Shirasawa M et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of subfoveal choroidal thickness in normal eyes of Japanese using different SD‐OCT devices. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012; 53: 1102–1107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansouri K, Medeiros FA, Tatham AJ et al. Evaluation of retinal and choroidal thickness by swept‐source optical coherence tomography: repeatability and assessment of artifacts. Am J Ophthalmol 2014; 157: 1022–1032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Buitendijk GH, Lee K et al. Validity of automated choroidal segmentation in SS‐OCT and SD‐OCT. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015; 56: 3202–3211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twa MD, Schulle KL, Chiu SJ et al. Validation of macular choroidal thickness measurements from automated SD‐OCT image segmentation. Optom Vis Sci 2016; 93: 1387–1398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benavente‐pérez A, Hosking SL, Logan NS et al. Reproducibility‐repeatability of choroidal thickness calculation using optical coherence tomography. Optom Vis Sci 2010; 87: 867–872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikuno Y, Maruko I, Yasuno Y et al. Reproducibility of retinal and choroidal thickness measurements in enhanced depth imaging and high‐penetration optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 5536–5540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sızmaz S, Küçükerdönmez C, Pınarcı EY et al. The effect of smoking on choroidal thickness measured by optical coherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol 2013; 97: 601–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vural AD, Kara N, Sayin N et al. Choroidal thickness changes after a single administration of coffee in healthy subjects. Retina 2014; 34: 1223–1228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang HM, Woo YJ, Koh HJ et al. The effect of consumption of ethanol on subfoveal choroidal thickness in acute phase. Br J Ophthalmol 2016; 100: 383–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoseini‐yazdi H, Vincent SJ, Collins MJ et al. Impact of image averaging on wide‐field choroidal thickness measurements using enhanced‐depth imaging optical coherence tomography. Clin Exp Optom 2019; 102: 320–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodman‐pieterse EC, Read SA, Collins MJ et al. Regional changes in choroidal thickness associated with accommodation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015; 56: 6414–6422.
   Google Scholar
• Sayin N, Kara N, Pekel G et al. Choroidal thickness changes after dynamic exercise as measured by spectral‐domain optical coherence tomography. Indian J Ophthalmol 2015; 63: 445–450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read SA, Collins MJ, Sander BP. Human optical axial length and defocus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 6262–6269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang ST, Phillips JR, Backhouse S. Effect of retinal image defocus on the thickness of the human choroid. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2015; 35: 405–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SB, Shin IH, Shin KS et al. Effects of refractive power on macular thickness measurement using spectral‐domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmologica 2015; 234: 172–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett A. A method of determining the equivalent powers of the eye and its crystalline lens without resort to phakometry. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1988; 8: 53–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmartin B, Nagra M, Logan NS. Shape of the posterior vitreous chamber in human emmetropia and myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013; 54: 7240–7251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel NB, Luo X, Wheat JL et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer assessment: area versus thickness measurements from elliptical scans centered on the optic nerve. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 2477–2489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso‐caneiro D, Read SA, Collins MJ. Automatic segmentation of choroidal thickness in optical coherence tomography. Biomed Opt Express 2013; 4: 2795–2812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso‐caneiro D, Read SA, Vincent SJ et al. Tissue thickness calculation in ocular optical coherence tomography. Biomed Opt Express 2016; 7: 629–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones SE, Buchbinder BR, Aharon I. Three‐dimensional mapping of cortical thickness using Laplace's Equation. Hum Brain Mapp 2000; 11: 12–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent SJ, Alonso‐caneiro D, Kricancic H et al. Scleral contact lens thickness profiles: the relationship between average and centre lens thickness. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2019; 42: 55–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics notes: measurement error. Br Med J 1996; 313: 744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carkeet A. Exact parametric confidence intervals for Bland‐Altman limits of agreement. Optom Vis Sci 2015; 92: e71–e80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Knol DL et al. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59: 1033–1039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho A, Choi Y, Kim Y. Influence of choroidal thickness on subfoveal choroidal thickness measurement repeatability using enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography. Eye 2014; 28: 1151–1160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Xue F, Zhou J et al. Effects of orthokeratology on choroidal thickness and axial length. Optom Vis Sci 2016; 93: 1064–1071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickla DL, Wallman J. The multifunctional choroid. Prog Retin Eye Res 2010; 29: 144–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrodl F, De laet A, Tassignon M‐J et al. Intrinsic choroidal neurons in the human eye: projections, targets, and basic electrophysiological data. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 3705–3712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar