37
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research

Multiple count sampling of goblet cells in microscope high‐power fields using conjunctival impression cytology

, PhD
Pages 772-777 | Received 30 Jul 2019, Accepted 13 Oct 2019, Published online: 15 Apr 2021

REFERENCES

  • Doughty MJ. Comparative anatomy and physiology of the cornea and conjunctiva. In: MHR, Corrales RM, eds. Ocular Surface. Baton Rouge, LA: CRC Press, 2012. pp. 32–78.
  • Doughty MJ. Goblet cells of the normal human conjunctiva and their assessment by impression cytology sampling. Ocular Surf 2012; 10: 149–169.
  • Aragona P, Romeo GF, Puzzolo D et al. Impression cytology of the conjunctival epithelium in patients with vernal conjunctivitis. Eye 1996; 10: 82–85.
  • Çakmak SS, Ünlü MK, Karaca C et al. Effects of soft contact lenses on conjunctival surface. Eye Conatct Lens 2003; 29: 230–233.
  • Rodriguez‐prats JL, Hamdi IM, Rodriguez AE et al. Effect of suction ring application during LASIK on goblet cell density. J Refract Surg 2007; 23: 559–562.
  • Sapkota K, Franco S, Sampaio P et al. Goblet cell density association with tear function and ocular surface. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 2015; 38: 240–244.
  • Sapkota K, Franco S, Sampaio P et al. Effect of three months of soft contact lens wear on conjunctival cytology. Clin Exp Optom 2016; 99: 336–341.
  • Kurna SA, Acikgoz S, Altun A et al. The effects of topical antiglaucoma drugs as monotherapy on the ocular surface: a prospective study. J Ophthalmol 2014; 2014: 460483.
  • Li M, Zhang M, Xiao Q et al. Tear function and goblet cell density after pterygium excision. Eye 2007; 21: 224–228.
  • Paschides CA, Petroutsos G, Psilas K. Correlation of conjunctival impression cytology results with lacrimal function and age. Acta Ophthalmol 1991; 69: 422–425.
  • Yalvaç IS, Gedikoğlu G, Karagöz Y et al. Effects of antiglaucoma drugs on ocular surface. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1995; 73: 246–248.
  • De rojas MV, Rodriguez MT, Ces balco JA et al. Impression cytology in patients with keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Cytopathology 1993; 4: 347–355.
  • Doughty MJ. Goblet cell density estimate differences in impression cytology samples varies with different magnification of images. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 2018; 41: 290–296.
  • Mcalinden C, Khadka J, Pesudovs K. Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) studies and sample size calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2015; 41: 2598–2604.
  • Colorado LH, Alzahrani Y, Pritchard N et al. Assessment of conjunctival goblet cell density using laser scanning confocal microscopy versus impression cytology. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2016; 39: 221–226.
  • Doughty MJ. Sampling area selection for the assessment of goblet cell density from conjunctival impression cytology specimens. Eye Contact Lens 2012; 38: 122–129.
  • Egbert PR, Lauber S, Maurice DM. A simple conjunctival biopsy. Am J Ophthalmol 1977; 84: 798–801.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.