Blur adaptation: clinical and refractive considerations

REFERENCES

• Mon‐williams M, Tresilian JR, Strang NC et al. Improving vision: neural compensation for optical defocus. Proc Biol Sci 1998; 265: 71–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesudovs K, Brennan NA. Decreased uncorrected vision after a period of distance fixation with spectacle wear. Optom Vis Sci 1993; 70: 528–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosser DA, Murdoch IE, Cousens SN. The effect of optical defocus on the test‐retest variability of visual acuity measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: 1076–1079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfield M, Hong SE, George S. Blur adaptation in myopes. Optom Vis Sci 2004; 81: 657–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charman WN, Jennings JA. The optical quality of the monochromatic retinal image as a function of focus. Br J Physiol Opt 1976; 31: 119–134.
   Google Scholar
• Radhakrishnan H, Pardhan S, Calver RI et al. Effect of positive and negative defocus on contrast sensitivity in myopes and non‐myopes. Vision Res 2004; 44: 1869–1878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cufflin MP, Mankowska A, Mallen EA. Effect of blur adaptation on blur sensitivity and discrimination in emmetropes and myopes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48: 2932–2939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cufflin MP, Hazel CA, Mallen EA. Static accommodative responses following adaptation to differential levels of blur. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2007; 27: 353–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radhakrishnan H, Pardhan S, Calver RI et al. Unequal reduction in visual acuity with positive and negative defocusing lenses in myopes. Optom Vis Sci 2004; 81: 14–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George S, Rosenfield M. Blur adaptation and myopia. Optom Vis Sci 2004; 81: 543–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid KL, Iskander DR, Li RWH et al. Blur detection thresholds in childhood myopia: single and dual target presentation. Vision Res 2002; 42: 239–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field DJ. Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. J Opt Soc Am A 1987; 4: 2379–2394.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tolhurst DJ, Tadmor Y, Chao T. Amplitude spectra of natural images. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1992; 12: 229–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster MA, Georgeson MA, Webster SM. Neural adjustments to image blur. Nat Neurosci 2002; 5: 839–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadmor Y, Tolhurst DJ. Discrimination of changes in the second‐order statistics of natural and synthetic images. Vision Res 1994; 34: 541–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vera‐diaz FA, Gwiazda J, Thorn F et al. Increased accommodation following adaptation to image blur in myopes. J Vis 2004; 4: 1111–1119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez GM, Archer SM, Artal P. Optical characterization of Bangerter foils. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 609–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcos S, Werner JS, Burns SA et al. Vision science and adaptive optics, the state of the field. Vision Res 2017; 132: 3–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawides L, de Gracia P, Dorronsoro C et al. Vision is adapted to the natural level of blur present in the retinal image. PLoS One 2011; 6: e27031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawides L, Marcos S, Ravikumar S et al. Adaptation to astigmatic blur. J Vis 2010; 10: 22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohlendorf A, Tabernero J, Schaeffel F. Neuronal adaptation to simulated and optically‐induced astigmatic defocus. Vision Res 2011; 51: 529–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang B, Ciuffreda KJ, Vasudevan B. Effect of blur adaptation on blur sensitivity in myopes. Vision Res 2006; 46: 3634–3641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cufflin MP, Mallen EA. Dynamic accommodation responses following adaptation to defocus. Optom Vis Sci 2008; 85: 982–991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh A, Zheleznyak L, Barbot A et al. Neural adaptation to peripheral blur in myopes and emmetropes. Vision Res 2017; 132: 69–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulere E, Moschandreas J, Kontadakis GA et al. Effect of blur and subsequent adaptation on visual acuity using letter and Landolt C charts: differences between emmetropes and myopes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2013; 33: 130–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris FL 3rd, Kassoff A, Bresnick GH et al. New visual acuity charts for clinical research. Am J Ophthalmol 1982; 94: 91–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfield M, Portello JK, Hong SE et al. Decay of blur adaptation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 4315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan KA, Dawson K, Mankowska A et al. The time course of blur adaptation in emmetropes and myopes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2013; 33: 305–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carkeet A, Lee L, Kerr JR et al. The slope of the psychometric function for Bailey‐Lovie letter charts: defocus effects and implications for modeling letter‐by‐letter scores. Optom Vis Sci 2001; 78: 113–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith G. Ocular defocus, spurious resolution and contrast reversal. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1982; 2: 5–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajeev N, Metha A. Enhanced contrast sensitivity confirms active compensation in blur adaptation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 1242–1246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkataraman AP, Winter S, Unsbo P et al. Blur adaptation: contrast sensitivity changes and stimulus extent. Vision Res 2015; 110: 100–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster MA. Contrast sensitivity under natural states of adaptation. Proc SPIE 1999; 3644: 58–70.
   Google Scholar
• Webster MA, Miyahara E. Contrast adaptation and the spatial structure of natural images. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 1997; 14: 2355–2366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott SL, Hardy JL, Webster MA et al. Aging and blur adaptation. J Vis 2007; 7: 8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vera‐diaz FA, Woods RL, Peli E. Shape and individual variability of the blur adaptation curve. Vision Res 2010; 50: 1452–1461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs RJ, Smith G, Chan CD. Effect of defocus on blur thresholds and on thresholds of perceived change in blur: comparison of source and observer methods. Optom Vis Sci 1989; 66: 545–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang B, Ciuffreda KJ. Blur discrimination of the human eye in the near retinal periphery. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 52–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le R, Bao J, Chen D et al. The effect of blur adaptation on accommodative response and pupil size during reading. J Vis 2010; 10: 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delshad S, Collins MJ, Read SA et al. The time course of blue adaptation and its persistence. In: The Association for Reaserch In Vision and Ophtalmology (ARVO) ‐ Asia Meeting. Brisbane, Qld: Brisbane Convention & Entertainment Centre, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Khan KA, Cufflin MP, Mallen EA. The effect of interrupted defocus on blur adaptation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2016; 36: 649–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portello J, Rosenfield M. Effect of intervening periods of clear vision on blur adaptation. Optom Vis Sci 2002; 79: 24.
   Google Scholar
• Artal P, Chen L, Fernández EJ et al. Adaptive optics for vision: the eye's adaptation to point spread function. J Refract Surg 2003; 19: S585–S587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artal P, Chen L, Fernández EJ et al. Neural compensation for the eye's optical aberrations. J Vis 2004; 4: 281–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mankowska A, Aziz K, Cufflin MP et al. Effect of blur adaptation on human parafoveal vision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012; 53: 1145–1150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vera‐diaz FA, Woods RL, Peli E. Blur adaptation to central retinal disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2017; 58: 3646–3655.
   Google Scholar
• Venkataraman AP, Radhakrishnan A, Dorronsoro C et al. Role of parafovea in blur perception. Vision Res 2017; 138: 59–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgeson MA, Sullivan GD. Contrast constancy: deblurring in human vision by spatial frequency channels. J Physiol 1975; 252: 627–656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell FW, Green DG. Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. J Physiol 1965; 181: 576–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakemore C, Campbell FW. On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. J Physiol 1969; 203: 237–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comerford JP, Thorn F, Chuang J. Contrast constancy with refractive blur. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 4719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanian V, Mutti DO. The effect of blur adaptation on contrast sensitivity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 5604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfield M, Abraham‐cohen JA. Blur sensitivity in myopes. Optom Vis Sci 1999; 76: 303–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorn F, Cameron L, Arnel J et al. Myopia adults see through defocus better than emmetropes. In: Tokoro T, ed. Myopia Updates Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Myopia. Tokyo: Springer, 1998. pp. 368–374.
   Google Scholar
• Radhakrishnan A, Dorronsoro C, Sawides L et al. Short‐term neural adaptation to simultaneous bifocal images. PLoS One 2014; 9: e93089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read SA, Collins MJ, Sander BP. Human optical axial length and defocus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 6262–6269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty R, Read SA, Collins MJ. Monocular myopic defocus and daily changes in axial length and choroidal thickness of human eyes. Exp Eye Res 2012; 103: 47–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang D, Chun RK, Liu M et al. Optical defocus rapidly changes choroidal thickness in schoolchildren. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0161535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin Z, Martinez A, Chen X et al. Peripheral defocus with single‐vision spectacle lenses in myopic children. Optom Vis Sci 2010; 87: 4–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar