645
Views
40
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The green economy, sustainability transitions and transition regions: a case study of boston

&
Pages 201-216 | Published online: 10 Nov 2016

References

  • ABJ (2011): ‘Greentech Boston: investigating investment in Boston's Innovation District’, American Business Journal (April/May): 46–52.
  • Barry, J. and Doran, P. (2006): ‘Refining green political economy: from ecological modernisation to economic security and sufficiency’, Analyse und Kritik: Zeitschrift für Sozialtheorie 28 (2): 250–275.
  • Barry, J. and Paterson, M. (2003): ‘The British state and the environment: New Labour's ecological modernisation strategy’, International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development 2 (3): 237–249.
  • Berkhout, F. (2002): ‘Technological regimes, path dependency and the environment’, Global Environmental Change 12 (1): 1–4.
  • Berkhout, F., Smith, A. and Stirling, A. (2003): Socio-technological regimes and transition contexts. SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series 106, Science and Technology Policy Research, University of Sussex, Brighton.
  • Bina, O. (2013): ‘The green economy and sustainable development: an uneasy balance?’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 31 (6): 1023–1047.
  • BMU (2008): ‘Ecological industrial policy: sustainable policy for innovation, growth and employment’. Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, Berlin.
  • Bowen, A., Fankhauser, S., Stern, N. and Zenghelis, D. (2009): ‘An outline of the case for a “green” stimulus’. Policy Brief, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment/Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, February.
  • BROOKINGS (2014): The Brookings Institution [online]. URL http://www.brookings.edu/ [accessed 15 July 2014].
  • Bulkeley, H., Castán broto, V. and Maassen, A. (2011): ‘Governing urban low carbon transitions’, in Bulkeley, H., Castán broto, V., Hodson, M. and Marvin, S. (eds): Cities and Low Carbon Transitions. Routledge, London, pp. 29–42.
  • Caprotti, F. (2012): ‘The cultural economy of cleantech: environmental discourse and the emergence of a new technology sector’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS 37 (3): 370–385.
  • CERES (2014): Ceres, Boston, MA [online]. URL http://www.ceres.org [accessed 15 July 2014].
  • CITY of BOSTON (2011): ‘The Economist Intelligence Unit ranks Boston 5th in the U.S. for environmental sustainability’, City of Boston [online]. URL https://www.cityofboston.gov/news/Default.aspx?id=5175 [accessed 28 April 2014].
  • CLEAN EDGE (2012): ‘U.S. Metro Clean Tech Index, October 2012: executive summary’, Clean Edge, Inc. [online]. URL http://cleanedge.com/sites/default/files/Metro2012summary.pdf [accessed 15 July 2014].
  • Coenen, L., Raven, R. and Verbong, G. (2010): ‘Local niche experimentation in energy transitions: a theoretical and empirical exploration of proximity advantages and disadvantages’, Technology in Society 32 (4): 295–302.
  • Coenen, L. and Truffer, B. (2012): ‘Places and spaces of sustainability transitions: geographical contributions to an emerging research and policy field’, European Planning Studies 20 (3): 367–374.
  • Cohen, B. (2006): Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems’, Business Strategy and the Environment 15 (1): 1–14.
  • Cohen, B. and Winn, M. I. (2007): ‘Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship’, Journal of Business Venturing 22 (1): 29–49.
  • Cooke, P. (2009): ‘Transition regions: green innovation and regional development’, paper presented to the DRUID summer conference, Copenhagen Business School, Fredriksberg, 17–19 June.
  • Cooke, P. (2010): ‘Regional innovation systems: development opportunities from the “green turn”’, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 22 (7): 831–844.
  • Cooke, P. (2011): ‘Transition regions: regional–national eco-innovation systems and strategies’, Progress in Planning 76 (3): 105–146.
  • DEFRA (2008): ‘Building a low carbon economy: unlocking innovation and skills’. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London.
  • DoL (2012): Green Goods and Services (GGS) survey program, Bureau of Labor Statistics, United States Department of Labor [online]. URL http://www.bls.gov/ggs/ [accessed 15 July 2014].
  • EIA (2014): Massachusetts, State profile and energy estimates, US Energy Information Administration [online]. URL http://www.eia.gov/state/?sid=MA [accessed 8 April 2014].
  • Geels, F. W. (2005): Technological Transitions and System Innovations: A Co-evolutionary and Socio-technical Analysis. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
  • Geels, F. W. (2010): ‘Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective’, Research Policy 39 (4): 495–510.
  • Geels, F. W. and Raven, R. (2006): ‘Non-linearity and expectations in niche-development trajectories: ups and downs in Dutch biogas development (1973–2003)’, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 18 (3–4): 375–392.
  • Geels, F. W. and Schot, J. (2007): ‘Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways’, Research Policy 36 (3): 399–417.
  • Genus, A. and Coles, A.-M. (2008): ‘Rethinking the multi-level perspective of technological transitions’, Research Policy 37 (9): 1436–1445.
  • Gibbs, D. (2002): Local Economic Development and the Environment. Routledge, London.
  • Gibbs, D. and Krueger, R. (2007): ‘Containing the contradictions of rapid development? New economy spaces and sustainable urban development’, in Krueger, R. and Gibbs, D. (eds): The Sustainable Development Paradox: Urban Political Economy in the United States and Europe. Guilford, New York, pp. 95–122.
  • Gibbs, D. and Krueger, R. (2012): ‘Fractures in metanarratives of development: an interpretive institutionalist account of land use development in the Boston city-region’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 36 (2): 363–380.
  • Gulliver, J. (2011): ‘Seeking public-private partnership for clean energy economy: PBLN at the Massachusetts Statehouse’, Alliance for Business Leadership, 15 July [online]. URL http://www.pbln.org/massachusetts-must-continue-its-leadership-in-building-a-clean-energy-economy-pbln-goes-to-the-state-house/ [accessed 31 October 2012].
  • Hamdouch, A. and Depret, M.-H. (2010): ‘Policy integration strategy and the development of the “green economy”: foundations and implementation patterns’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 53 (4): 473–490.
  • Healy, A. and Morgan, K. (2012): ‘Spaces of innovation: learning, proximity and the ecological turn’, Regional Studies 46 (8): 1041–1053.
  • Hodson, M. and Marvin, S. (2010): ‘Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were?’, Research Policy 39 (4): 477–485.
  • Jacobs, M. (2012): Green growth: economic theory and political discourse. Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy Working Paper 18/Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment Working Paper 92, Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, October.
  • Keijzers, G. (2002): ‘The transition to the sustainable enterprise’, Journal of Cleaner Production 10 (4): 349–359.
  • LEED (2012): Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design [online]. URL https://new.usgbc.org/leed [accessed 28 November 2012].
  • LGA (2009): ‘Creating green jobs: developing local low-carbon economies’. Local Government Association (England and Wales), London.
  • Lovell, H. (2007): ‘The governance of innovation in socio-technical systems: the difficulties of strategic niche management in practice’, Science and Public Policy 34 (1) 35–44.
  • Lovell, H., Bulkeley, H. and Owens, S. (2009): ‘Converging agendas? Energy and climate change policies in the UK’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 27 (1): 90–109.
  • Markard, J. and Truffer, B. (2008): ‘Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: towards an integrated framework’, Research Policy 37 (4): 596–615.
  • MassCEC (2012): Massachusetts Clean Energy Center [online]. URL http://www.masscec.com/index.cfm/page/About-MassCEC/pid/11193 [accessed 31 October 2012].
  • MassGov (2014): Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Boston, MA [online]. URL http://www.mass.gov/eea/air-water-climate-change/climate-change/massachusetts-global-warming-solutions-act/global-warming-solutions-act-background.html [accessed 18 July 2014].
  • Mccauley, S. M. and Stephens, J. C. (2012): ‘Green energy clusters and socio-technical transitions: analysis of a sustainable energy cluster for regional economic development in Central Massachusetts, USA’, Sustainability Science 7 (2): 213–225.
  • Meek, W. R., Pacheco, D. F. and York, J. G. (2010): ‘The impact of social norms on entrepreneurial action: evidence from the environmental entrepreneurship context’, Journal of Business Venturing 25 (5): 493–509.
  • Muro, M., Rothwell, J. and Saha, D. (2011): Sizing the green economy: a national and regional green jobs assessment. Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
  • Pollack, E. (2012): Counting up to green: assessing the green economy and its implications for growth and equity. EPI Briefing Paper 349, Economic Policy Institute, Washington, DC, October.
  • Raven, R., Schot, J. and Berkhout, F. (2012): ‘Space and scale in socio-technical transitions’, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 4: 63–78.
  • Raven, R. P. J. M., Verbong, G. P. J., Schilpzand, W. F. and Witkamp, M. J. (2011): ‘Translation mechanisms in socio-technical niches: a case study of Dutch river management’, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 23 (10): 1063–1078.
  • Rip, A. and Kemp, R. (1998): ‘Technological change’, in Rayner, S. and Malone, E. (eds): Human Choices and Climate Change, vol. 2. Batelle, Columbus, OH, pp. 327–399.
  • Schaltegger, S. and Wagner, M. (2011): ‘Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: categories and interactions’, Business Strategy and the Environment 20 (4): 222–237.
  • Schot, J. and Geels, F. W. (2008): ‘Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy’, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 20 (5): 537–554.
  • Schwartz, D. (2010): ‘Ranking cites top 10 universities for cleantech technologies’, Tech Transfer Central 8 January [online]. URL http://techtransfercentral.com/2010/01/06/ranking-cites-top-10-universities-for-cleantech-technologies/ [accessed 29 July 2014].
  • Seiffert, D. (2011): ‘Clean tech finds a new home at Greentown Labs’, Boston Business Journal 5 August.
  • Shove, E. (1998): ‘Gaps, barriers and conceptual chasms: theories of technology transfer and energy in buildings’, Energy Policy 26 (15): 1105–1112.
  • Shove, E. and Walker, G. (2007): ‘CAUTION! Transitions ahead: politics, practice, and sustainable transition management’, Environment and Planning A 39 (4): 763–770.
  • Smith, A. (2003): ‘Transforming technological regimes for sustainable development: a role for alternative technology niches?’, Science and Public Policy 30 (2): 127–135.
  • Smith, A. (2004): ‘Alternative technology niches and sustainable development’, Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice 6 (2): 220–235.
  • Smith, A. (2006): ‘Green niches in sustainable development: the case of organic food in the United Kingdom’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 24 (3): 439–458.
  • Smith, A. (2007): ‘Translating sustainabilities between green niches and socio-technical regimes’, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 19 (4): 427–450.
  • Smith, A., Voß, J.-P. and Grin, J. (2010): ‘Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: the allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges’, Research Policy 39 (4): 435–448.
  • Späth, P. and Rohracher, H. (2010): ‘“Energy regions”: the transformative power of regional discourses on socio-technical futures’, Research Policy 39 (4): 449–458.
  • Späth, P. and Rohracher, H. (2012): ‘Local demonstrations for global transitions – dynamics across governance levels fostering socio-technical regime change towards sustainability’, European Planning Studies 20 (3): 461–479.
  • Stergios, J. (2013): ‘Massachusetts' new economy’. Pioneer Institute, Boston, MA, February.
  • Truffer, B. (2008): ‘Society, technology, and region: contributions from the social study of technology to economic geography’, Environment and Planning A 40 (4): 966–985.
  • Truffer, B. and Coenen, L. (2012): ‘Environmental innovation and sustainability transitions in regional studies’, Regional Studies 46 (1): 1–21.
  • UNEP (2010): ‘Green economy: developing countries success stories’. Division of Technology, Industry and Economics, United Nations Environment Programme, Paris.
  • UNEP (2011): Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication – A Synthesis for Policy Makers. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi.
  • Unruh, G. C. (2002): ‘Escaping carbon lock-in’, Energy Policy 30 (4): 317–325.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.