Technocratic norms, political culture and climate change governance

References

• Andonova, L. B., Betsill, M. M. and Bulkeley, H. (2009): ‘Transnational climate governance’, Global Environmental Politics 9 (2): 52–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, I. and Caprotti, F. (2014): ‘The green economy: functional domains and theoretical directions of enquiry’, Environment and Planning A 46 (8): 1797–1813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, I. and Wilson, G. A. (2009): ‘Theorising transitional pathways in response to climate change: technocentrism, eco-centrism, and the carbon economy’, Environment and Planning A 41 (10): 2324–2341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, I., Gouldson, A. and Newell, P. (2011): ‘Ecological modernisation and the governance of carbon: a critical analysis’, Antipode 43 (3): 682–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, I., Macgill, I., Passey, R. and Compston, H. (2012): ‘The fall (and rise) of carbon pricing in Australia: a political strategy analysis of the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme’, Environmental Politics 21 (5): 691–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansal, P. and Knox-hayes, J. (2013): ‘The time and space of materiality in organizations and the natural environment’, Organization and Environment 26 (1): 61–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betsill, M. and Bulkeley, H. (2007): ‘Looking back and thinking ahead: a decade of cities and climate change research’, Local Environment 12 (5): 447–456.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, F., Pattberg, P. and Zelli, F. (2010): Global Climate Governance Beyond 2012: Architecture, Agency and Adaptation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Bina, O. (2013): ‘The green economy and sustainable development: an uneasy balance?’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 31 (6): 1023–1047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck, H. J. (2012): ‘Geoengineering: re-making climate for profit or humanitarian intervention?’, Development and Change 43 (1): 253–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. (2000): ‘Discourse coalitions and the Australian climate change policy network’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 18 (6): 727–748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. (2001): ‘Governing climate change: the politics of risk society?’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS 26 (4): 430–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprotti, F. (2012): ‘The cultural economy of cleantech: environmental discourse and the emergence of a new technology sector’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS 37 (3): 370–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castree, N. (2008b): ‘Neoliberalising nature: processes, effects, and evaluations’, Environment and Planning A 40 (1): 153–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christoff, P. (2005): ‘Policy autism or double-edged dismissiveness? Australia's climate policy under the Howard government’, Global Change, Peace and Security 17 (1): 29–44.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, G. L. (1998): ‘Stylized facts and close dialogue: methodology in economic geography’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 88 (1): 73–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culver, J. H. and Syer, J. C. (1988): Power and Politics in California. 3rd edn. Macmillan, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Curran, G. (2011): ‘Modernising climate policy in Australia: climate narratives and the undoing of a Prime Minister’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 29 (6): 1004–1017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC (2014): ‘Proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the establishment and operation of a market stability reserve for the Union greenhouse gas emission trading scheme and amending Directive 2003/87/ EC’. COM(2014) 20 final, European Commission, Brussels, 22 January.
   Google Scholar
• EIA (2012): California's first greenhouse gas emissions auction sells near minimum price, US Energy Information Administration, 12 December [online]. URL http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=9310 [accessed 10 February 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. and Graebner, M. E. (2007): ‘Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges’, Academy of Management Journal 50 (1): 25–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellerman, A. D. and Buchner, B. K. (2007): ‘The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme: origins, allocation, and early results’, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 1 (1): 66–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EU (2003): ‘Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC’, Official Journal of the European Union L 275 (25 October): 32–46.
   Google Scholar
• Garnaut, R. (2008): The Garnaut Climate Change Review: Final Report. Cambridge University Press, Melbourne, VIC.
   Google Scholar
• Garsten, C. and Jacobsson, K. (2007): ‘Corporate globalisation, civil society and post-political regulation – whither democracy?’, Development Dialogue 49: 143–157.
   Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A. (1998): ‘From individual to organizational identity’, in Whetten, D. A. and Godfrey, P. C. (eds): Identity in Organizations: Building theory through Conversations. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 17–31.
   Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G. and Hamilton, A. L. (2013): ‘Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: notes on the Gioia methodology’, Organizational Research Methods 16 (1): 15–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjelten, T. (2011): ‘Cyberthieves target European carbon credit market’, National Public Radio, 22 January [online]. URL http://www.npr.org/2011/01/22/133123389/cyberthieves-target-european-carbon-credit-market [accessed 3 February 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Hanemann, M. (2008): ‘California's new greenhouse gas laws’, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2 (1): 114–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. and Knox-hayes, J. (2014): ‘Security in climate change discourse: analyzing the divergence between US and EU approaches to policy’, Global Environmental Politics 14 (2): 82–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, P. J. (1996): ‘Introduction: alternative perspectives on national security’, in Katzenstein, P. J. (ed.): The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Knox-hayes, J. (2009): ‘The developing carbon financial service industry: expertise, adaptation and complementarity in London and New York’, Journal of Economic Geography 9 (6): 749–777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox-hayes, J. (2010a): ‘Constructing carbon market space-time: climate change and the onset of neo-modernity’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 100 (4): 953–962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox-hayes, J. (2010b): ‘Creating the carbon market institution: analysis of the organizations and relationships that build the market’, Competition and Change 14 (3–4): 176–202.
   Google Scholar
• Knox-hayes, J. (2012): ‘Negotiating climate legislation: policy path dependence and coalition stabilization’, Regulation and Governance 6 (4): 545–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. and Gibbs, D. (2010): ‘Competitive global city regions and “sustainable development”: an interpretive institutionalist account in the South East of England’, Environment and Planning A 42 (4): 821–837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krutz, G. S. (2001): Hitching a Ride: Omnibus Legislating in the U.S. Congress. Ohio State University Press, Columbus, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Lutsey, N. and Sperling, D. (2008): ‘America's bottom-up climate change mitigation policy’, Energy Policy 36 (2): 673–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mccarthy, J. (2012): ‘The financial crisis and environmental governance “after” neoliberalism’, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 103 (2): 180–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, P. and Paterson, M. (2010): Climate Capitalism: Global Warming and the Transformation of the Global Economy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Núñez, F. and Pavley, F. (2006): Assembly Bill No. 32 [online]. URL http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/05-06/bill/asm/ab_0001-0050/ab_32_bill_20060927_chaptered.pdf [accessed 12 April 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Ocampo, J. A. (2011): ‘The transition to a green economy: benefits, challenges and risks from a sustainable development perspective: summary of background papers’. Report by a Panel of Experts to Second Preparatory Meeting for United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, Division for Sustainable Development UN-DESA, UNEP, UN Conference on Trade and Development, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, S. and Cowell, R. (2011): Land and Limits: Interpreting Sustainability in the Planning Process. 2nd edn. Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• PARLIAMENT of AUSTRALIA (2010): Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme, Parliament of Australia, Canberra, ACT, 22 October [online]. http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/Browse_by_Topic/ClimateChange/Governance/Domestic/national/cprs [accessed 6 July 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Pattberg, P. (2007): Private Institutions and Global Governance: The New Politics of Environmental Sustainability. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• PRIME MINISTERIAL TASK GROUP on EMISSIONS TRADING (2007): Report of the Task Group on Emissions Trading. Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Australian Government, Canberra, ACT.
   Google Scholar
• Rootes, C. (2014): ‘A referendum on the carbon tax? The 2013 Australian election, the Greens, and the environment’, Environmental Politics 23 (1): 166–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudd, K. (2007): Transcripts of opening remarks to the National Climate Change Summit, Parliament House, Canberra 31 March 2007 [online]. URL http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/media/pressrel/H4OM6/upload_binary/h4om62.pdf [accessed 24 February 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. (1998): Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2010): ‘Apocalypse forever? Post-political populism and the spectre of climate change’, Theory, Culture and Society 27 (2–3): 213–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TREASURY (2011): Strong Growth, Low Pollution: Modelling a Carbon Price. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, ACT.
   Google Scholar
• UN (1998): ‘Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change’. United Nations, Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, H., Pollack, M. A. and Young, A. R. (2010): Policy-Making in the European Union. 6th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Wettestad, J. (2009): ‘European climate policy: toward centralized governance?’, Review of Policy Research 26 (3): 311–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wettestad, J. (2014): ‘Rescuing EU emissions trading: mission impossible?’, Global Environmental Politics 14 (2): 64–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• While, A., Jonas, A. E. G. and Gibbs, D. (2010): ‘From sustainable development to carbon control: eco-state restructuring and the politics of urban and regional development’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS 35 (1): 76–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zito, A. R. (2000): Creating Environmental Policy in the European Union. Macmillan, Basingstoke.
   Google Scholar
• Zwick, S. (2011): Carbon crooks arrested in Romania?, Ecosystem Marketplace, Washington, DC, 29 January [online]. URL http://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/pages/dynamic/article.page.php?page_id=7965 [accessed 3 February 2013].
   Google Scholar